| Literature DB >> 34711694 |
Weihua Wu1,2, Jinlong Zhang1, Lianbo Shao1, Haoyue Huang1, Qingyou Meng1, Zhenya Shen1, Xiaomei Teng1.
Abstract
Background andEntities:
Keywords: Abdominal aortic aneurysms; Endothelial progenitor cells; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Porcine pancreatic elastase
Year: 2022 PMID: 34711694 PMCID: PMC9148833 DOI: 10.15283/ijsc21027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stem Cells ISSN: 2005-3606 Impact factor: 3.011
Subject’s characteristics
| Con (n=7) | AAA before EVAR (n=7) | AAA after EVAR (n=7) | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 69±9.81 | 67±9.41 | 67±9.41 | N.S |
| Male sex, N (%) | 4 (57%) | 5 (71%) | 5 (71%) | N.S |
| SBP, mmHg | 132.14±10.62 | 130.57±10.09 | 130.14±6.33 | N.S |
| DBP, mmHg | 73.57±6.26 | 70±6.95 | 71±10.18 | N.S |
| Hypertension (%) | 5 (71%) | 6 (86%) | 6 (86%) | N.S |
| Diabetes (%) | 1 (14%) | 1 (14%) | 1 (14%) | N.S |
| Smoking (%) | 4 (57%) | 4 (57%) | 4 (57%) | N.S |
| CAD(%) | 2 (29%) | 1 (14%) | 1 (14%) | N.S |
| Diameter (mm) | 18.28±2.56 | 58.09±11.24 | 23.14±1.07# | <0.05 |
| WBC (109/l) | 7.10±1.10 | 6.68±1.41 | 6.52±1.36 | N.S |
| Platelet (109/l) | 205.71±48.33 | 214±49.06 | 257.86±89.75 | N.S |
| Creatinine, μmol/l | 71.56±21.93 | 73.5±13.32 | 71.69±7.73 | N.S |
| Hemoglobin, mmol/l | 31.01±1.15 | 30.03±1.85 | 29.24±1.97# | <0.05 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/l | 4.89±1.26 | 4.43±0.65 | 3.93±0.99 | <0.05 |
| Triglyceride, mmol/l | 2.18±0.93 | 1.23±0.28 | 1.1±0.36 | N.S |
Demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbodity conditions, complications of all subjects. Data are displayed as means±SD or number (%). AAA: abdominal aortic aneurysm, EVAR: endovascular aneurysm repair, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, SBP: systolic blood pressure, CAD: coronary artery disease, WBC: white blood cell. *p<0.05 compared to Con. #p<0.05 compared to AAA before EVAR.
Fig. 1Circulating levels of EPCs in the peripheral blood from subjects. (A) Circulating numbers of EPCs waswere measured in different groups by flow cytometry. (B) Percentage of circulating CD34+/CD309+ cells in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms compared to age-matched con-trols. *p<0.05, vs. Con. #p<0.05, vs. AAA before EVAR.
Fig. 2Aneurysm formation after peri-adventitial elastase application. (A) Characteristic morphology of the abdominal aorta. (Left) One abdominal aortic aneurysm is shown from the Control group. (Middle) An aorta at the end of 5th week after PPE application. (Right) Morphology of a separated abdominal aorta. (B) Changes in the aortic diameter above baseline and post-operatively. (C) The dilation ratios of the abdominal aorta followed for 5 weeks. An aneurysm was defined as an increase in the aortic diameter by ≥ 50% above baseline. *p<0.05, vs. Con.
Fig. 3Histological sections of abdominal aorta. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the aorta. (B) Verhoeff-Van Gieson (VVG) staining of elastic fibers in aneurysm sections. (C) Immunofluorescence of abdominal aorta sections labeled with antibodies to detect CD34 (red) and CD309 (green). The white arrow indicates CD34+/CD309+ cells colocalizing as orange.
Fig. 4Circulating levels of EPCs in AAA rats. (A) Circulating numbers of EPCs in different groups by flow cytometry. (B) Percentage of circulating CD34+/CD309+ cells in rats with abdominal aortic aneurysms compared with controls. *p<0.05, vs. Con.