Mauro Rigato1, Angelo Avogaro1, Gian Paolo Fadini2. 1. From the Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. 2. From the Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. gianpaolo.fadini@unipd.it.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Circulating progenitor cells (CPCs), including endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are biologically related to many aspects of cardiovascular disease, as they promote angiogenesis and vascular repair. OBJECTIVE: We herein aimed to meta-analyze studies reporting the prognostic role of the CPC/EPC measure on cardiovascular outcomes and death. METHODS AND RESULTS: We screened the English-language literature for longitudinal studies reporting the association between baseline CPC/EPC levels, future cardiovascular events, and death. We retrieved 28 studies, 21 of which contained poolable data and entered the meta-analysis, for a total of 4155 patients, mostly with a high baseline cardiovascular risk. Sixty percent of the studies met at least 11 of 16 items of quality assessment. Overall, reduced CPC/EPC levels were associated with a ≈2-fold increased risk of future cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death. The most predictive phenotype was CD34(+)CD133(+): low versus high levels predicted cardiovascular events, restenosis after endovascular intervention, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality. Heterogeneity among studies and according to the CPC/EPC phenotype was generally high. Excluding studies for which the risk estimate had to be extrapolated or limiting the analyses to higher quality studies still indicated a significant risk for future cardiovascular events and death in patients with low versus high progenitor cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that a reduction in the levels of circulating cells putatively provided with vasculoregenerative properties represents a risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and death.
RATIONALE: Circulating progenitor cells (CPCs), including endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are biologically related to many aspects of cardiovascular disease, as they promote angiogenesis and vascular repair. OBJECTIVE: We herein aimed to meta-analyze studies reporting the prognostic role of the CPC/EPC measure on cardiovascular outcomes and death. METHODS AND RESULTS: We screened the English-language literature for longitudinal studies reporting the association between baseline CPC/EPC levels, future cardiovascular events, and death. We retrieved 28 studies, 21 of which contained poolable data and entered the meta-analysis, for a total of 4155 patients, mostly with a high baseline cardiovascular risk. Sixty percent of the studies met at least 11 of 16 items of quality assessment. Overall, reduced CPC/EPC levels were associated with a ≈2-fold increased risk of future cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death. The most predictive phenotype was CD34(+)CD133(+): low versus high levels predicted cardiovascular events, restenosis after endovascular intervention, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality. Heterogeneity among studies and according to the CPC/EPC phenotype was generally high. Excluding studies for which the risk estimate had to be extrapolated or limiting the analyses to higher quality studies still indicated a significant risk for future cardiovascular events and death in patients with low versus high progenitor cell counts. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that a reduction in the levels of circulating cells putatively provided with vasculoregenerative properties represents a risk factor for adverse cardiovascular outcomes and death.
Authors: F Boscari; M D'Anna; B M Bonora; S Tresso; R Cappellari; A Avogaro; D Bruttomesso; G P Fadini Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2020-05-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Salim S Hayek; James MacNamara; Ayman S Tahhan; Mosaab Awad; Adithya Yadalam; Yi-An Ko; Sean Healy; Iraj Hesaroieh; Hina Ahmed; Brandon Gray; Salman S Sher; Nima Ghasemzadeh; Riyaz Patel; Jinhee Kim; Edmund K Waller; Arshed A Quyyumi Journal: Circ Res Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Rian Q Landers-Ramos; Ryan M Sapp; Daniel D Shill; James M Hagberg; Steven J Prior Journal: Compr Physiol Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 8.915