| Literature DB >> 34709730 |
Laura Monturiol-Gross1, Fabian Villalta-Romero2, Marietta Flores-Díaz1, Alberto Alape-Girón1,3.
Abstract
Bacterial phospholipases and sphingomyelinases are lipolytic esterases that are structurally and evolutionarily heterogeneous. These enzymes play crucial roles as virulence factors in several human and animal infectious diseases. Some bacterial phospholipases C (PLCs) have both phosphatidylcholinesterase and sphingomyelinase C activities. Among them, Listeria monocytogenes PlcB, Clostridium perfringens PLC, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PlcH are the most deeply understood. In silico predictions of substrates docking with these three bacterial enzymes provide evidence that they interact with different substrates at the same active site. This review discusses structural aspects, substrate specificity, and the mechanism of action of those bacterial enzymes on target cells and animal infection models to shed light on their roles in pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial pathogenesis; bacterial phospholipases; bacterial sphingomyelinases; bacterial toxins; virulence factors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34709730 PMCID: PMC8634861 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.13320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Open Bio ISSN: 2211-5463 Impact factor: 2.693
Fig. 1Cartoon representation of the tertiary structure of three bacterial PLCs, which play a role as virulence factors: (A) L. monocytogenes PlcB model built using as template B. cereus PLC (PDB accession No. 1ah7). (B) C. perfringens alpha‐toxin three‐dimensional structure (PDB accession No. 1ca1). (C) P. aeruginosa PaPlcH model built using as template the Francisella tularensis Acid Phosphatase A (PDB accession No 2d1g). The α‐helices, β‐sheets, and loops are labeled in red, cyan, and gray, respectively.
Fig. 2The electrostatic potential surface of LmPlcB with docked PC and SM. The generated model of LmPlcB (Fig. 1A) was used as a target for docking studies. SwissDock web service (http://www.swissdock.ch/docking) was used to predict the molecular interactions that may occur with different phospholipids: PC (PubChem CID:5497103) (A and B) and SM (ZINC56870813) (C and D). The docked structures were visualized using Discovery Studio Visualizer.
Fig. 3The electrostatic potential surface of CpPLC with docked PC and SM. The structure of CpPLC (PDB accession no. 1ca1) was used as a target for docking studies. SwissDock web service (http://www.swissdock.ch/docking) was used to predict the molecular interactions that may occur with PC (PubChem CID:5497103) (A and B) and SM (ZINC56870813) (C and D). The docked structures were visualized using the Discovery Studio Visualizer.
Fig. 4The electrostatic potential surface of PaPlcH with docked PC and SM. The generated model of PaPlcH (Fig. 1C) was used as a target for docking studies. SwissDock web service (http://www.swissdock.ch/docking) was used to predict the molecular interactions that may occur with PC (PubChem CID:5497103) (A and B) and SM (ZINC56870813) (C and D). The docked structures were visualized using Discovery Studio Visualizer.
Broad substrate specificities and optimal pH from LmPlcB, CpPLC, and PaPlcH.
| Enzyme | Substrates | pH activity | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. monocytogenes PlcB | PC, SM, PE, PG, PI, Cardiolipin, Plasmalogens, Plasmenylethanolamine (Glycerol acetal), PS |
5.0–8.0 optimal: 5.0–6.0 | [ |
|
| PC, SM, PE, PG, PI, PS |
4.5–7.5 PC: optimal 5.0–6.0 SM: optimal 7.0 | [ |
|
| PC, SM, PE, PG, Cardiolipin, Plasmalogens, Lyso‐PC |
5.5–8.0 Optimal 7.0–8.0 | [ |