Literature DB >> 34707327

Evaluation of competing risks prediction models using polytomous discrimination index.

Maomao Ding1, Jing Ning2, Ruosha Li3.   

Abstract

For competing risks data, it is often important to predict a patient's outcome status at a clinically meaningful time point after incorporating the informative censoring due to competing risks. This can be done by adopting a regression model that relates the cumulative incidence probabilities to a set of covariates. To assess the performance of the resulting prediction tool, we propose an estimator of the polytomous discrimination index applicable to competing risks data, which can quantify a prognostic model's ability to discriminate among subjects from different outcome groups. The proposed estimator allows the prediction model to be subject to model misspecification and enjoys desirable asymptotic properties. We also develop an efficient computation algorithm that features a computational complexity of O(n log n). A perturbation resampling scheme is developed to achieve consistent variance estimation. Numerical results suggest that the estimator performs well under realistic sample sizes. We apply the proposed methods to a study of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competing risks; Fine & Gray model; cumulative incidence; polytomous discrimination index; predictive discrimination; prognostic model

Year:  2020        PMID: 34707327      PMCID: PMC8547414          DOI: 10.1002/cjs.11583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Stat        ISSN: 0319-5724            Impact factor:   0.758


  18 in total

1.  Parametric regression on cumulative incidence function.

Authors:  Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks.

Authors:  Paul Blanche; Jean-François Dartigues; Hélène Jacqmin-Gadda
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Multiple-Event Forced-Choice Tasks in the Theory of Signal Detectability

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  Nonparametric estimation and inference for polytomous discrimination index.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Qunqiang Feng; Jason P Fine; Michael J Pencina; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Evaluating classification accuracy for modern learning approaches.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Ming Gao; Ralph D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Weighted NPMLE for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk.

Authors:  Anna Bellach; Michael R Kosorok; Ludger Rüschendorf; Jason P Fine
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Terry M Therneau; S Vincent Rajkumar; Janice R Offord; Dirk R Larson; Matthew F Plevak; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Quantifying and estimating the predictive accuracy for censored time-to-event data with competing risks.

Authors:  Cai Wu; Liang Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Time-dependent predictive accuracy in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  P Saha; P J Heagerty
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.