| Literature DB >> 34705513 |
Jingli Wang1,2,3, Lejuan Cai1, Jiewei Chen1, Xuyun Guo1, Yuting Liu4, Zichao Ma4, Zhengdao Xie5, Hao Huang6,7, Mansun Chan4, Ye Zhu1, Lei Liao5, Qiming Shao4, Yang Chai1,3,8.
Abstract
Ultrathin two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors are regarded as a potential channel material for low-power transistors with small subthreshold swing and low leakage current. However, their dangling bond–free surface makes it extremely difficult to deposit gate dielectrics with high-quality interface in metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) field-effect transistors (FETs). Here, we demonstrate a low-temperature process to transfer metal gate to 2D MoS2 for high-quality interface. By excluding extrinsic doping to MoS2 and increasing contact distance, the high–barrier height Pt-MoS2 Schottky junction replaces the commonly used MOS capacitor and eliminates the use of gate dielectrics. The MoS2 transferred metal gate (TMG) FETs exhibit sub-1 V operation voltage and a subthreshold slope close to thermal limit (60 mV/dec), owing to intrinsically high junction capacitance and the high-quality interface. The TMG and back gate enable logic functions in a single transistor with small footprint.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34705513 PMCID: PMC8550226 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf8744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1.Comparison of top-gated MOSFET and TMGFET.
(A) Schematic device structure of top-gated MOSFETs. The gate dielectric is HfO2 grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD). (B) Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the interface between the MoS2 and HfO2 of the MoS2 MOSFET. (C) Cross-sectional representation of scatterings and traps in top-gated MoS2 MOSFET. (D) Device structure of the TMGFET with TMG electrode. (E) Cross-sectional TEM image of the interface between the MoS2 and Pt of the MoS2 TMGFET. (F) Cross-sectional representation of gap states in MoS2 TMGFET. (G) Device structure of the MoS2 TMGFET with SAL. (H) Cross-sectional TEM image and (I) schematic illustration of the interface between the MoS2 and Pt of the MoS2 TMGFET with SAL.
Fig. 2.Schottky barrier of the Pt-MoS2 contact.
(A to C) The extraction of effective electron SBH of MoS2/Pt junction with different contact electrodes, including evaporated Pt, transferred Pt without SAL, and transferred Pt with SAL. (D to F) The calculated DOS of the interface between Pt and MoS2 with close contact model of evaporated Pt. The MoS2 layer number is set to be three layers. (G) Side view of the MoS2/Pt structure. The left image is close contact model for the evaporated Pt, the middle is the transferred Pt contact model, and the right one is non-close contact model for the transferred Pt with SAL. (H) Calculated SBH with different contact distance from 0.52 to 1.12 nm, showing a clear transition from n-type to p-type SBH with the increase of contact distance.
Fig. 3.Electrical characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET.
(A) Optical and AFM image of the MoS2 TMGFET. (B) Semilog plot of I-V curve of Schottky diode. (C) Thickness-dependent transfer characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET. (D) Corresponding SS for three devices with different thickness at Vds of 1 V. (E) Temperature-dependent transfer characteristics of the TMGFET. (F) Output characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET.
Fig. 4.Electrical characteristics of the optimized MoS2 TMGFET.
(A) Schematic illustration and (B) Transfer characteristics of MoS2 TMGFET and Au S/D electrodes. (C) Output characteristics of MoS2 TMGFET with Au S/D electrodes. (D) Schematic illustration of MoS2 TMGFET with Au S/D electrodes and self-aligned doping. (E) Transfer characteristics for MoS2 TMGFET before and after self-aligned doping. (F) Transfer characteristics of the doped TMGFET under different gate bias. (G) Hysteresis and SS of the doped TMGFET. (H) Mobility of the TMGFET with different film thicknesses. (I) Output characteristics for doped MoS2 TMGFET in Fig. 1E.
Fig. 5.Double-gate logic operation with the TMGFET.
(A) Demonstration of the OR and AND logic operations. The Vds is 1 V. The thickness of the device for the red line is 11.5 nm, and the thickness for the blue line is 3.4 nm. When the thickness of the channel material is decreased, the output logic changes from OR to AND. (B) Thickness-dependent semilog plot of the transfer curves of the MoS2 TMGFET with different IN A corresponding to (A). The Vds is 1 V. (C) Operation of the logic OR with different IN A and IN B. (D) Operation of the logic AND. (E) Schematics of thickness-dependent depletion region of MoS2 TMGFETs under the operation of double gate.