Literature DB >> 34705513

Transferred metal gate to 2D semiconductors for sub-1 V operation and near ideal subthreshold slope.

Jingli Wang1,2,3, Lejuan Cai1, Jiewei Chen1, Xuyun Guo1, Yuting Liu4, Zichao Ma4, Zhengdao Xie5, Hao Huang6,7, Mansun Chan4, Ye Zhu1, Lei Liao5, Qiming Shao4, Yang Chai1,3,8.   

Abstract

Ultrathin two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors are regarded as a potential channel material for low-power transistors with small subthreshold swing and low leakage current. However, their dangling bond–free surface makes it extremely difficult to deposit gate dielectrics with high-quality interface in metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) field-effect transistors (FETs). Here, we demonstrate a low-temperature process to transfer metal gate to 2D MoS2 for high-quality interface. By excluding extrinsic doping to MoS2 and increasing contact distance, the high–barrier height Pt-MoS2 Schottky junction replaces the commonly used MOS capacitor and eliminates the use of gate dielectrics. The MoS2 transferred metal gate (TMG) FETs exhibit sub-1 V operation voltage and a subthreshold slope close to thermal limit (60 mV/dec), owing to intrinsically high junction capacitance and the high-quality interface. The TMG and back gate enable logic functions in a single transistor with small footprint.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34705513      PMCID: PMC8550226          DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf8744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Adv        ISSN: 2375-2548            Impact factor:   14.136


INTRODUCTION

Power-constraint application scenarios, e.g., the edge devices in Internet of Things, demand the electron devices with low-power devices (–). To meet these requirements, the field-effect transistors (FETs), the building block of integrated circuits, should have low operation voltage, small subthreshold slope (SS), and low leakage current. Ultrathin two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors, especially transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) with relatively large bandgap, have been shown with excellent electrostatic gate control for low-power electronics (–). The high-k dielectrics on 2D TMD FETs should be ultrathin and uniform and have weak interaction with TMDs to preserve their intrinsic properties. However, it has been proven a grand challenge to prepare high-k dielectrics on dangling bond–free surface of 2D TMDs because of the lack of nucleation sites (, , ). To eliminate the use of high-k dielectrics in FETs, an alternative approach is to adopt junction capacitance in the gate terminals of FETs, e.g., the pn junction in junction FETs (JFETs) and Schottky junction in metal-semiconductor FETs (MESFETs), which usually have much larger capacitance than dielectric capacitance and show efficient electrostatic gate control (, ). The surface potential changes in JFETs and MESFETs are equal to the gate voltage (–). Compared with JFET, the MESFET has a simple structure and is relatively easy to fabricate. However, the Fermi level pinning and metal-induced gap states in the metal/TMD interface make it challenging to fabricate ideal Schottky junction (–). In this work, we design and fabricate transferred metal gate FETs (TMGFETs) based on a transferred Pt/MoS2. By using transfer metal gate and self-assembled layer (SAL), we achieve an ideal metal/MoS2 Schottky junction. Our density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that the change of Schottky barrier height (SBH) is a result of the increased interfacial contact distance and reduced metal-induced gap state. Because of the optimized interface and efficient gate control, the TMGFET shows an SS approaching thermal limits of 60 mV/dec, negligible hysteresis, and ON/OFF ratio of 106 with low leakage current. We also demonstrate thickness-dependent logic functions (OR and AND) using TMG and back gate in a single transistor. Our study shows that 2D TMGFETs provide a design of simplified device structure for low-power electronics.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Figure 1A depicts cross-sectional schematics of a top-gated 2D MoS2 transistors with HfO2 dielectrics. Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image (Fig. 1B) shows the interface disorder between gate dielectrics and MoS2 as well as the damages to the top layer of MoS2, which inevitably results from harsh dielectrics deposition process. These interface disorders act as charge traps and adversely affect the SS and hysteresis of the device (Fig. 1C). In addition, the carriers in top-gated FETs locate extremely close to the insulator/semiconductor interface. The interface disorders and traps strongly scatter the carrier transport and degrade the device performance (, , ). Figure S1 shows thickness-dependent electrical characteristics of the MoS2 top-gated FETs with 15-nm-thick HfO2 dielectrics grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD) process. The SS of the devices is larger than 100 mV/dec and shows large variation in the forward and reverse sweep.
Fig. 1.

Comparison of top-gated MOSFET and TMGFET.

(A) Schematic device structure of top-gated MOSFETs. The gate dielectric is HfO2 grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD). (B) Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the interface between the MoS2 and HfO2 of the MoS2 MOSFET. (C) Cross-sectional representation of scatterings and traps in top-gated MoS2 MOSFET. (D) Device structure of the TMGFET with TMG electrode. (E) Cross-sectional TEM image of the interface between the MoS2 and Pt of the MoS2 TMGFET. (F) Cross-sectional representation of gap states in MoS2 TMGFET. (G) Device structure of the MoS2 TMGFET with SAL. (H) Cross-sectional TEM image and (I) schematic illustration of the interface between the MoS2 and Pt of the MoS2 TMGFET with SAL.

Comparison of top-gated MOSFET and TMGFET.

(A) Schematic device structure of top-gated MOSFETs. The gate dielectric is HfO2 grown by atomic layer deposition (ALD). (B) Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the interface between the MoS2 and HfO2 of the MoS2 MOSFET. (C) Cross-sectional representation of scatterings and traps in top-gated MoS2 MOSFET. (D) Device structure of the TMGFET with TMG electrode. (E) Cross-sectional TEM image of the interface between the MoS2 and Pt of the MoS2 TMGFET. (F) Cross-sectional representation of gap states in MoS2 TMGFET. (G) Device structure of the MoS2 TMGFET with SAL. (H) Cross-sectional TEM image and (I) schematic illustration of the interface between the MoS2 and Pt of the MoS2 TMGFET with SAL. For the MoS2 TMGFET, we choose Pt as the gate electrode because of its high work function of 5.6 eV, which facilities the formation of ideal Schottky barrier to n-type MoS2 (, ). To reduce the Fermi level pinning effect at the metal/semiconductor interface, researchers have attempted to weaken the interaction between the metal electrode and the semiconducting channel by adopting interfacial layer or van der Waals (vdW) contact (, , , , ). In this work, we adopt different methods to fabricate MoS2/Pt Schottky junction for comparison, including electron beam evaporation and transferred metal electrode method with and without SAL. Figure 1D is the cross-sectional schematic of a MoS2TMGFET with the transferred Pt electrode. The detailed fabrication process is described in Materials and Methods and fig. S2. Benefiting from the mild transfer method of the gate electrode, the MoS2 channel shows negligible defects (Fig. 1E). The semiconducting channel in MoS2 TMGFET configuration is away from the metal/MoS2 interface (Fig. 1F). The carrier in MoS2 channel suffers from less scattering from the metal/semiconductor interface, which allows to retain the intrinsic mobility of MoS2. For the MoS2 TMGFETs with interfacial layer, we insert a SAL at the Pt/MoS2 interface to unpinning the Fermi level. The detailed fabrication process is schematically illustrated in fig. S3. Figure 1 (G and H) is the cross-sectional schematic and the TEM image at the interface of the Pt/SAL/MoS2 interface, respectively. Similar to the Pt/MoS2, the Pt/SAL/MoS2 still retains the intact characteristics of MoS2 layer without any damage. The SAL uniformly distributed between Pt and MoS2 with a thickness of 1.5 nm. Figures S4 and S5 show the high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) image of the Pt/MoS2 and Pt/SAL/MoS2, respectively. We characterize the surface of the samples using atomic force microscopy (AFM) (fig. S6). It is noteworthy that the SAL only exists on the surface of MoS2 and shows absence on the surface of SiO2, which is possibly a result of the binding energy between the organic layer and the MoS2 (). We perform temperature-dependent measurement to investigate the SBH of the Pt/MoS2 and Pt/SAL/MoS2 (fig. S7). The SBH is extracted by using the 2D thermionic emission equation and an Arrhenius plot (). Figure 2 (A to C) presents the SBH of these devices with different contact configurations, including evaporated Pt electrodes and transferred Pt electrodes with and without SAL. The Fermi level of evaporated Pt contact lies close to the conduction band of MoS2, exhibiting SBH of 62 meV. For the transferred Pt/MoS2, because of minimized disorder and weak interaction at the interface, the Fermi level lies close to the valence band with SBH of 147 meV. For the transferred Pt/SAL/MoS2, the SAL separates the metal and MoS2, reduces the metal-induced gap states, and increases the SBH (261 meV), which enables highly efficient gate control and suppresses the leakage current (). The MoS2/SiO2 interface is rich with trap states and can dope the MoS2 channel, thus affecting the SBH between the top metal electrode and MoS2 (, ). To eliminate this extrinsic factor, we adopt hexamethyldisilazane as a passivation layer of SiO2 to reduce the substrate doping effect (fig. S8).
Fig. 2.

Schottky barrier of the Pt-MoS2 contact.

(A to C) The extraction of effective electron SBH of MoS2/Pt junction with different contact electrodes, including evaporated Pt, transferred Pt without SAL, and transferred Pt with SAL. (D to F) The calculated DOS of the interface between Pt and MoS2 with close contact model of evaporated Pt. The MoS2 layer number is set to be three layers. (G) Side view of the MoS2/Pt structure. The left image is close contact model for the evaporated Pt, the middle is the transferred Pt contact model, and the right one is non-close contact model for the transferred Pt with SAL. (H) Calculated SBH with different contact distance from 0.52 to 1.12 nm, showing a clear transition from n-type to p-type SBH with the increase of contact distance.

Schottky barrier of the Pt-MoS2 contact.

(A to C) The extraction of effective electron SBH of MoS2/Pt junction with different contact electrodes, including evaporated Pt, transferred Pt without SAL, and transferred Pt with SAL. (D to F) The calculated DOS of the interface between Pt and MoS2 with close contact model of evaporated Pt. The MoS2 layer number is set to be three layers. (G) Side view of the MoS2/Pt structure. The left image is close contact model for the evaporated Pt, the middle is the transferred Pt contact model, and the right one is non-close contact model for the transferred Pt with SAL. (H) Calculated SBH with different contact distance from 0.52 to 1.12 nm, showing a clear transition from n-type to p-type SBH with the increase of contact distance. Furthermore, we construct the Pt/MoS2 contact model with chemical bonding and different contact distances to understand the fundamentals of the interface. Through DFT calculations, we can determine the density of state (DOS) at the interface caused by the interfacial layer (Fig. 2, D to F) (). For the evaporated contact, the interlayer distance between Pt atom and MoS2 is 2.7 Å after the relaxation, in which they form covalent bonding at the interface (Fig. 2G). The EF of the evaporated Pt contact electrode lies in the middle of the MoS2 bandgap (Fig. 2D). Owing to the decay of metal wave function that penetrates to the semiconductor with nanometer depth, metal-induced gap states form in the forbidden band of MoS2, thus reducing the barrier for electrons (, ). The first layer of MoS2 is metallized under the contact electrode, leading to the Fermi level pinned close to the conduction band of MoS2 (, ). For the transferred Pt/MoS2 contact model, the interlayer distances are fixed from 5.2 to 9.2 Å; and for the transferred Pt/SAL/MoS2 model, the interlayer distance is relatively large (11.2 Å) according to the TEM characterization results (Fig. 1H). Figure 2 (E to F) shows the corresponding DOS of the transferred metal contact with and without SAL. In contrast with the direct contact model, almost no metal-induced gap states exist in the bandgap in both cases. For the Pt/MoS2 contact model with the interlayer distance of 5.2 Å, the Fermi level lies close to the valence band of MoS2 (Fig. 2E). For the Pt/SAL/MoS2 model with the interlayer distance of 11.2 Å, the Fermi level lies close to the valence band of MoS2 (Fig. 2F). Figure S9 presents the DOS of the junction with the interlayer distances of 7.2 and 9.2 Å. The Schottky barrier can be obtained by measuring the energy difference between the Fermi level (EF) and the original conduction band minimum (EC) or valence band maximum (EV). Figure 2H is the SBH corresponding to the distance between the Pt and the MoS2. With the increase of interlayer distance, the Fermi level shifts from EC close to EV. Figure 3A shows representative optical and AFM image of the MoS2 TMGFET. The source/drain (S/D) electrodes are transferred Ag electrode, and the gate stack is transferred Pt/SAL/MoS2. For comparison, we also fabricate MoS2 TMGFET without SAL. Ag has relatively low work function and can form ohmic contact to MoS2. Therefore, the Pt gate and Ag source electrode with MoS2 act as asymmetric contact diode. The Pt/SAL/MoS2 junction shows an ideality factor η of 1.18, and the Pt/MoS2 shows an ideality factor η of 1.83 (Fig. 3B), suggesting high interfacial quality of the interface. Considering the lower ideality factor and current, we choose Pt/SAL/MoS2 as the gate stack. Figure 3C shows the MoS2 thickness–dependent transfer characteristics of TMGFETs. For the device with monolayer MoS2, it exhibits enhanced mode with an ON/OFF ratio of about 103; for the device with 8.1 nm thickness, the ON/OFF ratio is about 106. The Vth shift from 0.04 to −0.21 V with thickness increase from 0.9 to 8.1 nm. Thicker MoS2 requires higher voltage to deplete the channel region and shifts the threshold voltage to the negative side.
Fig. 3.

Electrical characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET.

(A) Optical and AFM image of the MoS2 TMGFET. (B) Semilog plot of I-V curve of Schottky diode. (C) Thickness-dependent transfer characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET. (D) Corresponding SS for three devices with different thickness at Vds of 1 V. (E) Temperature-dependent transfer characteristics of the TMGFET. (F) Output characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET.

Electrical characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET.

(A) Optical and AFM image of the MoS2 TMGFET. (B) Semilog plot of I-V curve of Schottky diode. (C) Thickness-dependent transfer characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET. (D) Corresponding SS for three devices with different thickness at Vds of 1 V. (E) Temperature-dependent transfer characteristics of the TMGFET. (F) Output characteristics of the MoS2 TMGFET. Figure 3D presents the corresponding SS as a function of drain current. All the devices show SS close to thermal limits (60 mV/dec), which is much smaller than the top-gated MOSFET (>100 mV/dec). Benefiting from the small hysteresis, the SS for the forward and reverse sweep almost overlap in the subthreshold region. The clean interface in TMGFETs minimizes the trapping states and allows an ideal SS. In comparison with the JFET made with metallic 2D materials, the carrier concentration and conductivity of the metal electrode are much higher. The gate voltage applied to the electrode fully drops in the metal/semiconductor junction, in which any variation in gate potential is completely transferred to channel. The perfect interface, together with the high gate controllability, ensure that the SS is approaching the thermal limits. Similar to conventional MOSFET, the transconductance can be used to extract the effective filed-effect mobility (). The mobility of the TMGFET can be expressed according to Eq. 1where L, W, and t are the channel length, gate width, and thickness of channel, respectively. Gmax is the max transconductance, q is electron charge, and Nd is the carrier concentration. The Nd can be estimated by electron carrier density at zero gate voltage by Hall measurement (fig. S10)where H is the magnetic field, I is the current, and VH is the Hall voltage. The highest effective field-effect mobility of the TMGFET is extracted as 106.1 cm−2/V·s. The high-quality Pt/SAL/MoS2 interface helps to reduce the scattering at the interface and retains the intrinsically high mobility of MoS2. Thickness-dependent field-effect mobilities of top-gated MoS2 FETs are given in fig. S1, ranging from 4.9 to 33. 8 cm−2/V·s, which is much smaller than the mobility of TMGFET. Figure 3E is the temperature-dependent transfer characteristics of TMGFET. The transconductance Gm and gate leakage current are given in fig. S11. We measured the carrier density of MoS2 from 300 to 360 K, and the corresponding mobilities of TMGFETs are 89.4, 186.1, 170.1, and 287.4 cm2/ V·s under 300, 320, 340, and 360 K, respectively. The carrier of TMGFET is away from the top surface, thus reducing the surface phonon scattering. The Coulomb scattering reduces with temperature and results in high mobility (). Figure 3F shows the output characteristics of TMGFETs. The device shows linear behavior at the small V region, indicating ohmic contact of the Ag/MoS2. The output current easily saturates at various gate voltages and shows the highest output current of 3.9 μA/μm with the highest drain voltage of 2 V. For the TMGFETs with Ag S/D electrodes, the contact between Ag and the top layer MoS2 is ohmic. When positive voltage is applied to the gate electrode, there will be leakage current from the source to the gate electrode. To reduce the surface leakage of the TMGFET, we use the Au S/D electrode to construct Schottky contact (Fig. 4A). Compared with the Ag contact, a small Schottky barrier forms at the Au/top MoS2 interface. When positive voltage is applied to the gate electrode, the Au/top MoS2 acts as a reverse biased Schottky diode and decreases the surface leakage current. Figure 4B shows transfer characteristics of the Au S/D TMGFETs with different thicknesses. Although the ON-state current is much smaller compared with the Ag contact one, both OFF-state current and gate leakage show notable reduction. Figure 4C is the output characteristics with the Au S/D electrode, exhibiting much smaller output current compared with the Ag contact.
Fig. 4.

Electrical characteristics of the optimized MoS2 TMGFET.

(A) Schematic illustration and (B) Transfer characteristics of MoS2 TMGFET and Au S/D electrodes. (C) Output characteristics of MoS2 TMGFET with Au S/D electrodes. (D) Schematic illustration of MoS2 TMGFET with Au S/D electrodes and self-aligned doping. (E) Transfer characteristics for MoS2 TMGFET before and after self-aligned doping. (F) Transfer characteristics of the doped TMGFET under different gate bias. (G) Hysteresis and SS of the doped TMGFET. (H) Mobility of the TMGFET with different film thicknesses. (I) Output characteristics for doped MoS2 TMGFET in Fig. 1E.

Electrical characteristics of the optimized MoS2 TMGFET.

(A) Schematic illustration and (B) Transfer characteristics of MoS2 TMGFET and Au S/D electrodes. (C) Output characteristics of MoS2 TMGFET with Au S/D electrodes. (D) Schematic illustration of MoS2 TMGFET with Au S/D electrodes and self-aligned doping. (E) Transfer characteristics for MoS2 TMGFET before and after self-aligned doping. (F) Transfer characteristics of the doped TMGFET under different gate bias. (G) Hysteresis and SS of the doped TMGFET. (H) Mobility of the TMGFET with different film thicknesses. (I) Output characteristics for doped MoS2 TMGFET in Fig. 1E. To increase the current density of the device with Au contact, we use a self-aligned surface doping method to increase the carrier concentration and reduce the access resistance. After completing the fabrication process of the TMGFETs with Au contact, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is spin-coated onto the device, acting as n-type dopant to increase the conductivity of MoS2 (). Figure S12 shows the n-type doping effect of back-gated MoS2 FET with the use of the PVA. Figure 4D illustrates the schematic image of MoS2 TMGFET with self-aligned doping and Au S/D. The PVA increases the carrier concentration in MoS2 because of charge transfer. Even the carrier density of MoS2 close to the contact region increases, the Schottky barrier at the Au/top MoS2 still acts as a reverse diode to reduce the surface leakage. Figure 4E shows the double sweep transfer characteristics of the TMGFETs before and after the PVA doping. With the reduced contact resistance, the ON-state current shows notable improvement of over 2 decades from 7.4 × 10−9 to 1.11 × 10−6 A. The turn-on voltage shifts to the negative direction. Figure 4F shows the transfer characteristics and gate leakage under different V. The transistor switches ON at −0.6 V. The gate leakage exhibits negligible increment at V = 0.1 V, which is caused by the reduced reverse voltage with lower Vd. The device shows negligible hysteresis of 6 mV, and the SS approaches the thermal limits of 60 mV/dec in almost all the subthreshold region (Fig. 4G). We also investigate the effect of MoS2 thickness on device SS (Fig. 4H). The device with MoS2 thickness less than 9 nm shows a stable SS below 70 mV/dec. Figure 4I is the output characteristic of the device in Fig. 4D. Compared to the Au S/D one without doping, the output current increased by over 20 times to 1.5 μA/μm. The Schottky barrier at the Au/MoS2 interface still retains after the doping process, showing nonlinear characteristics at the low V region. We summarize the key parameters compared with previous 2D JFET, as shown in table S1. Figure 5A shows transfer curves of TMGFET with different back-gated voltages of −20, 0, and 20 V. The SS under different back gate bias is given in fig. S13. The bottom gate voltage can be further reduced with gate dielectric layer with high capacitance. Figure S14 shows the transfer characteristics with 5/70 nm Al2O3/Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) gate dielectric layer, in which the back-gated voltage can be reduced to ±2 V. The turn-off voltage shifts to the negative direction when positive back-gated voltage (+20 V) is applied. When the back-gated voltage changes from −20 to 20 V, the OFF-state current for the thick sample (11.5 nm thickness, red curve) increase from 3.3 × 10−12 to 8.0 × 10−10 A; for the thin sample (3.4 nm thickness, blue curve), the OFF-state current remains almost unchanged. At the same time, the ON-state current for the thick sample increases from 6.7 × 10−7 to 1.7 × 10−6 A; for the thin sample, its On-state current increases from 1.7 × 10−11 to 3.2 × 10−8 A. These thickness-dependent characteristics are resulted from the fact that the TMG electrostatic control is limited by Deybe length from top surface (). By coupling with back gate from bottom surface of MoS2, it allows more efficiently electrostatic gate control and even logic computing functions within one single transistor.
Fig. 5.

Double-gate logic operation with the TMGFET.

(A) Demonstration of the OR and AND logic operations. The Vds is 1 V. The thickness of the device for the red line is 11.5 nm, and the thickness for the blue line is 3.4 nm. When the thickness of the channel material is decreased, the output logic changes from OR to AND. (B) Thickness-dependent semilog plot of the transfer curves of the MoS2 TMGFET with different IN A corresponding to (A). The Vds is 1 V. (C) Operation of the logic OR with different IN A and IN B. (D) Operation of the logic AND. (E) Schematics of thickness-dependent depletion region of MoS2 TMGFETs under the operation of double gate.

Double-gate logic operation with the TMGFET.

(A) Demonstration of the OR and AND logic operations. The Vds is 1 V. The thickness of the device for the red line is 11.5 nm, and the thickness for the blue line is 3.4 nm. When the thickness of the channel material is decreased, the output logic changes from OR to AND. (B) Thickness-dependent semilog plot of the transfer curves of the MoS2 TMGFET with different IN A corresponding to (A). The Vds is 1 V. (C) Operation of the logic OR with different IN A and IN B. (D) Operation of the logic AND. (E) Schematics of thickness-dependent depletion region of MoS2 TMGFETs under the operation of double gate. We can denote the top TMG voltage as IN A and back-gated voltage as IN B. The high- and low-output current are defined as OUT 1 and OUT 0, respectively. The thickness-dependent responses enable different logic operations. Figure 5B is a demonstration of OR and AND logic with a single transistor. The input signals of the IN A and IN B are shown in the above panel. The thick sample (11.5 nm) exhibits OR function, while the thin (3.4 nm) sample shows a AND function. Figure 5 (C and D) is the graphical demonstration of the OR and AND logic operation, where red and blue represent the ON and OFF states, respectively. Figure 5E compares the device working mechanisms of the logic operation. When negative back gate voltage is applied to the thin device, the back gate almost depletes the entire channel regardless of the top gate voltage. For the thick device, the top gate can still tune the depletion region to control the conductivity. When positive back gate voltage is applied to the thin device, the top gate can modulate the depletion region. However, the depletion region of the thick device cannot cut off the accumulation layer away from the Debye length, thus making the device conductive regardless of the top gate voltage. In summary, we develop a fabrication process by transferring metal gate electrodes to 2D semiconducting channel, which eliminates the use of vacuum and high-temperature process typically for preparing FETs. We also design and adopt a SAL to optimize the TMG/MoS2 interface. Our experimental results and DFT calculation verify that the increase of the contact distance can reduce Fermi level pinning and metal-induced gap state. The TMGFETs show the SS approaching the thermal limit, high ON/OFF ratio, and low gate leakage current. Furthermore, double-gate configuration enables the logic functions with small footprint. These studies show that TMGFETs are promising candidates for low-power electronic applications with a simple fabrication method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Device fabrication and electrical measurement

For the top-gated MoS2 MOSFET devices, 2D MoS2 flakes were mechanically exfoliated onto top of highly doped Si wafer with 300-nm-thick SiO2. PMMA was used as the resist layers, and after the development of the patterns, the Cr/Au electrode was deposited by the thermal deposition. After the deposition, we used acetone to lift-off the patterns. ALD was used to deposit HfO2 film on MoS2 at 95°C. We use tetrakis (dimethylamido) hafnium as Hf source and H2O as oxidant. The gate electrodes were deposited through electron beam lithography and lift-off processes. For the MoS2 TMGFETs, electrodes were prefabricated on a Si substrate using standard photolithography and electron beam deposition. Transfer method was applied to fabricate the vdW contact to 2D materials. Detailed methods are described in figs. S2 and S3. Note that the SiO2 treatment to reduce the substrate doping effect is of great importance. Electrical characteristics of fabricated FETs were measured with the Lake Shore TTPX Probe Station and Keithley 4200 Semiconductor Characterization System (SCS) under 10−4 torr. For the PVA-doped devices, 4% PVA was spin-coated onto the TMGFETs with 2000 rpm for 30 s and baked under 90°C for 30 min under 10−2 torr. For the logic devices, the AND logic device uses the Ag/Au S/D electrode for higher On-state current and the OR logic devices uses the Au S/D electrode to reduce the OFF-state current.

Cross-sectional TEM sample preparation and characterization

A MultiBeam SEM-FIB system (JIB-4501, JEOL) was used for the cross-sectional sample preparation, operated using 30-keV Ga+. TEM and STEM characterization was performed on a JEOL JEM-2100F TEM/STEM operated at 200 kV, equipped with an Oxford INCA Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) detector and a Gatan Enfina Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) spectrometer for elemental mapping. EELS spectrum imaging was conducted in STEM mode with a 13-mrad convergence angle. The high-resolution STEM image was acquired from an aberration-corrected JEM-ARM200CF TEM/STEM.

DFT simulations

Theoretical calculations were performed using Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package code (5.4.3) with exchange-correlation energy functional, which were modeled by Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof functional (–). The cutoff energy for Pt-MoS2 FET-like junction was set to be 520 eV, and all structures were relaxed to an energy convergence of 10−4 eV/atom and a force convergence of 0.02 eV/Å, respectively. The k points for Pt-MoS2 junction was 3 × 3 × 1 in slab optimization and 5 × 5 × 1 in static calculation. vdW-DF2 correction was applied to make a correction to the interfacial vdW bonding (). The interfacial interaction between metallic Pt and MoS2 was investigated by setting different interface separation distances of 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 Å, respectively. The thickness of vacuum in all the models was set to 20 Å to eliminate the interactions between the layers caused by the periodic boundary condition.
  20 in total

1.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Improved description of the structure of molecular and layered crystals: ab initio DFT calculations with van der Waals corrections.

Authors:  Tomáš Bučko; Jürgen Hafner; Sébastien Lebègue; János G Ángyán
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material.

Authors:  L Wang; I Meric; P Y Huang; Q Gao; Y Gao; H Tran; T Taniguchi; K Watanabe; L M Campos; D A Muller; J Guo; P Kim; J Hone; K L Shepard; C R Dean
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Schottky Barrier Height Engineering for Electrical Contacts of Multilayered MoS2 Transistors with Reduction of Metal-Induced Gap States.

Authors:  Gwang-Sik Kim; Seung-Hwan Kim; June Park; Kyu Hyun Han; Jiyoung Kim; Hyun-Yong Yu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Vertical and In-Plane Current Devices Using NbS2/n-MoS2 van der Waals Schottky Junction and Graphene Contact.

Authors:  Hyung Gon Shin; Hyong Seo Yoon; Jin Sung Kim; Minju Kim; June Yeong Lim; Sanghyuck Yu; Ji Hoon Park; Yeonjin Yi; Taekyeong Kim; Seong Chan Jun; Seongil Im
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 11.189

6.  High Mobility MoS2 Transistor with Low Schottky Barrier Contact by Using Atomic Thick h-BN as a Tunneling Layer.

Authors:  Jingli Wang; Qian Yao; Chun-Wei Huang; Xuming Zou; Lei Liao; Shanshan Chen; Zhiyong Fan; Kai Zhang; Wei Wu; Xiangheng Xiao; Changzhong Jiang; Wen-Wei Wu
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  SnSe/MoS2 van der Waals Heterostructure Junction Field-Effect Transistors with Nearly Ideal Subthreshold Slope.

Authors:  Jian Guo; Laiyuan Wang; Yiwei Yu; Peiqi Wang; Yu Huang; Xiangfeng Duan
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 30.849

8.  Highly efficient and stable MoS2 FETs with reversible n-doping using a dehydrated poly(vinyl-alcohol) coating.

Authors:  César J Lockhart de la Rosa; Amirhasan Nourbakhsh; Markus Heyne; Inge Asselberghs; Cedric Huyghebaert; Iuliana Radu; Marc Heyns; Stefan De Gendt
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  A new metal transfer process for van der Waals contacts to vertical Schottky-junction transition metal dichalcogenide photovoltaics.

Authors:  Cora M Went; Joeson Wong; Phillip R Jahelka; Michael Kelzenberg; Souvik Biswas; Matthew S Hunt; Abigail Carbone; Harry A Atwater
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  Surface proximity effect enables layer-by-layer growth of MoS2.

Authors:  Yang Chai
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 23.178

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.