Literature DB >> 34702072

Risk of herbivory negatively correlates with the diversity of volatile emissions involved in plant communication.

Patrick Grof-Tisza1, Richard Karban2, Muhammad Usman Rasheed1, Amélie Saunier1, James D Blande1.   

Abstract

Plant-to-plant volatile-mediated communication and subsequent induced resistance to insect herbivores is common. Less clear is the adaptive significance of these interactions; what selective mechanisms favour plant communication and what conditions allow individuals to benefit by both emitting and responding to cues? We explored the predictions of two non-exclusive hypotheses to explain why plants might emit cues, the kin selection hypothesis (KSH) and the mutual benefit hypothesis (MBH). We examined 15 populations of sagebrush that experience a range of naturally occurring herbivory along a 300 km latitudinal transect. As predicted by the KSH, we found several uncommon chemotypes with some chemotypes occurring only within a single population. Consistent with the MBH, chemotypic diversity was negatively correlated with herbivore pressure; sites with higher levels of herbivory were associated with a few common cues broadly recognized by most individuals. These cues varied among different populations. Our results are similar to those reported for anti-predator signalling in vertebrates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artemisia tridentata; chemotype; eavesdropping; induced resistance; kin selection; volatile signalling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34702072      PMCID: PMC8548805          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  29 in total

1.  Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females.

Authors:  C M De Moraes; M C Mescher; J H Tumlinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls.

Authors:  P W Sherman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Informed herbivore movement and interplant communication determine the effects of induced resistance in an individual-based model.

Authors:  Ilan N Rubin; Stephen P Ellner; André Kessler; Kimberly A Morrell
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Variability in plant nutrients reduces insect herbivore performance.

Authors:  William C Wetzel; Heather M Kharouba; Moria Robinson; Marcel Holyoak; Richard Karban
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Volatile-Mediated within-Plant Signaling in Hybrid Aspen: Required for Systemic Responses.

Authors:  Tao Li; James D Blande
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 6.  Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences.

Authors:  Robert D Magrath; Tonya M Haff; Pamela M Fallow; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-06-11

7.  Inter-varietal interactions among plants in genotypically diverse mixtures tend to decrease herbivore performance.

Authors:  Ian M Grettenberger; John F Tooker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size.

Authors:  Christopher N Templeton; Erick Greene; Kate Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication.

Authors:  Richard Karban; Kaori Shiojiri; Mikaela Huntzinger; Andrew C McCall
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  CHEMOTYPIC Variation in Volatiles and Herbivory for Sagebrush.

Authors:  Richard Karban; Patrick Grof-Tisza; James D Blande
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.