Literature DB >> 16676536

Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication.

Richard Karban1, Kaori Shiojiri, Mikaela Huntzinger, Andrew C McCall.   

Abstract

Airborne communication between individuals, called "eavesdropping" in this paper, can cause plants to become more resistant to herbivores when a neighbor has been experimentally clipped. The ecological relevance of this result has been in question, since individuals may be too far apart for this interaction to affect many plants in natural populations. We investigated induced resistance to herbivory in sagebrush, Artemisia tridentata, caused by experimental clipping of the focal plant and its neighbors. We found no evidence for systemic induced resistance when one branch was clipped and another branch on the same plant was assayed for naturally occurring damage. In this experiment, air contact and plant age were not controlled. Previous work indicated that sagebrush received less damage when a neighboring upwind plant within 15 cm had been experimentally clipped. Here we found that pairs of sagebrush plants that were up to 60 cm apart were influenced by experimental clipping of a neighbor. Furthermore, we observed that most individuals had conspecific neighbors that were much closer than 60 cm. Air contact was essential for communication; treatments that reduced airflow between neighboring individuals, either because of wind direction or bagging, prevented induced resistance. Airflow was also necessary for systemic induced resistance among branches within an individual. Reports from the literature indicated that sagebrush is highly sectorial, as are many desert shrubs. Branches within a sagebrush plant do not freely exchange material via vascular connections and apparently cannot rely on an internal signaling pathway for coordinating induction of resistance to herbivores. Instead, they may use external, volatile cues. This hypothesis provides a proximal explanation for why sagebrush does not demonstrate systemic induced resistance without directed airflow, and why airborne communication between branches induces resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16676536     DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[922:drisva]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  77 in total

Review 1.  Herbivore induced plant volatiles: their role in plant defense for pest management.

Authors:  Abdul Rashid War; Hari Chand Sharma; Michael Gabriel Paulraj; Mohd Yousf War; Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2011-12

Review 2.  Plant communication: mediated by individual or blended VOCs?

Authors:  Hirokazu Ueda; Yukio Kikuta; Kazuhiko Matsuda
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-02-01

Review 3.  The 'root-brain' hypothesis of Charles and Francis Darwin: Revival after more than 125 years.

Authors:  Frantisek Baluska; Stefano Mancuso; Dieter Volkmann; Peter W Barlow
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-12

4.  Identity recognition and plant behavior.

Authors:  Richard Karban; Kaori Shiojiri
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-07-01

5.  New evidence for a multi-functional role of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in defense against herbivores.

Authors:  Cesar R Rodriguez-Saona; Christopher J Frost
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-01

6.  Plant age, communication, and resistance to herbivores: young sagebrush plants are better emitters and receivers.

Authors:  Kaori Shiojiri; Richard Karban
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Tradeoff between resistance induced by volatile communication and over-topping vertical growth.

Authors:  Richard Karban
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2017-04-12

8.  Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature.

Authors:  Martin Heil; Juan Carlos Silva Bueno
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Plant defense priming against herbivores: getting ready for a different battle.

Authors:  Christopher J Frost; Mark C Mescher; John E Carlson; Consuelo M De Moraes
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  CHEMOTYPIC Variation in Volatiles and Herbivory for Sagebrush.

Authors:  Richard Karban; Patrick Grof-Tisza; James D Blande
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.