Literature DB >> 34697239

Estimating sexual size dimorphism in fossil species from posterior probability densities.

Tomohiko Sasaki1, Sileshi Semaw2,3, Michael J Rogers4, Scott W Simpson5, Yonas Beyene6, Berhane Asfaw7, Tim D White2,8, Gen Suwa9.   

Abstract

Accurate characterization of sexual dimorphism is crucial in evolutionary biology because of its significance in understanding present and past adaptations involving reproductive and resource use strategies of species. However, inferring dimorphism in fossil assemblages is difficult, particularly with relatively low dimorphism. Commonly used methods of estimating dimorphism levels in fossils include the mean method, the binomial dimorphism index, and the coefficient of variation method. These methods have been reported to overestimate low levels of dimorphism, which is problematic when investigating issues such as canine size dimorphism in primates and its relation to reproductive strategies. Here, we introduce the posterior density peak (pdPeak) method that utilizes the Bayesian inference to provide posterior probability densities of dimorphism levels and within-sex variance. The highest posterior density point is termed the pdPeak. We investigated performance of the pdPeak method and made comparisons with the above-mentioned conventional methods via 1) computer-generated samples simulating a range of conditions and 2) application to canine crown-diameter datasets of extant known-sex anthropoids. Results showed that the pdPeak method is capable of unbiased estimates in a broader range of dimorphism levels than the other methods and uniquely provides reliable interval estimates. Although attention is required to its underestimation tendency when some of the distributional assumptions are violated, we demonstrate that the pdPeak method enables a more accurate dimorphism estimate at lower dimorphism levels than previously possible, which is important to illuminating human evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimate; fossils; human evolution; mixture analysis; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34697239      PMCID: PMC8612211          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2113943118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Early Pliocene hominids from Gona, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Sileshi Semaw; Scott W Simpson; Jay Quade; Paul R Renne; Robert F Butler; William C McIntosh; Naomi Levin; Manuel Dominguez-Rodrigo; Michael J Rogers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates.

Authors:  J M Plavcan; C P van Schaik
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Paleobiological implications of the Ardipithecus ramidus dentition.

Authors:  Gen Suwa; Reiko T Kono; Scott W Simpson; Berhane Asfaw; C Owen Lovejoy; Tim D White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

5.  Sexual dimorphism in large-bodied primates: the case of the subfossil lemurs.

Authors:  L R Godfrey; S K Lyon; M R Sutherland
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Australopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia.

Authors:  T D White; G Suwa; B Asfaw
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Sexual dimorphism in early anthropoids.

Authors:  J G Fleagle; R F Kay; E L Simons
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-09-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Sexual differences in the anterior dentition in African primates.

Authors:  A J Almquist
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Sexual dimorphism in Ramapithecinae.

Authors:  R F Kay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Interpreting hominid behavior on the basis of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  J M Plavcan; C P van Schaik
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.895

View more
  1 in total

1.  Canine sexual dimorphism in Ardipithecus ramidus was nearly human-like.

Authors:  Gen Suwa; Tomohiko Sasaki; Sileshi Semaw; Michael J Rogers; Scott W Simpson; Yutaka Kunimatsu; Masato Nakatsukasa; Reiko T Kono; Yingqi Zhang; Yonas Beyene; Berhane Asfaw; Tim D White
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.