Literature DB >> 9085186

Interpreting hominid behavior on the basis of sexual dimorphism.

J M Plavcan1, C P van Schaik.   

Abstract

Numerous studies use estimates of sexual dimorphism in canine tooth size and body weight to support speculation about the behavior of australopithecines. However, the range of mating systems inferred for australopithecines encompasses virtually the entire spectrum of mating systems seen among extant anthropoid primates, from monogamy to polygyny characterized by intense male male competition. This variety of opinion can be attributed partly to the unusual combination of high body size dimorphism and reduced canine dimorphism in australopithecines. Here we provide a joint comparison of recent models for the behavioral correlates of both canine dimorphism and body size dimorphism, and apply this to published estimates of dimorphism in body size and canine tooth size in hominids. Among extant species, body weight dimorphism and canine dimorphism are strongly correlated with estimates of intrasexual competition. Canine crown height dimorphism provides the best discrimination between taxa that show high degrees of male-male competition, and those that do not. Relative male maxillary canine tooth size offers additional evidence about male-male competition. On the other hand, canine occlusal dimorphism offers little discrimination among species of different male-male competition levels. Estimates of canine dimorphism, relative canine size, and body weight dimorphism in australopithecines provide little definitive information about male-male competition or mating systems. Dimorphism of Australopithecus africanus and Australopithecus robustus can be reconciled with a mating system characterized by low-intensity male-male competition. The pattern of dimorphism and relative canine size in Australopithecus afarensis and A. robustus provides contradictory evidence about mating systems and male-male competition. We review a number of hypotheses that may explain the unusual pattern of dimorphism of A. afarensis and Australopithecus boisei, but non-satisfactorily resolves the problem given current data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9085186     DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1996.0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  22 in total

1.  Strontium isotope evidence for landscape use by early hominins.

Authors:  Sandi R Copeland; Matt Sponheimer; Darryl J de Ruiter; Julia A Lee-Thorp; Daryl Codron; Petrus J le Roux; Vaughan Grimes; Michael P Richards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Father Death and Adult Success among the Tsimane: Implications for Marriage and Divorce.

Authors:  Jeffrey Winking; Michael Gurven; Hillard Kaplan
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.178

3.  Equality for the sexes in human evolution? Early hominid sexual dimorphism and implications for mating systems and social behavior.

Authors:  Clark Spencer Larsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neither chimpanzee nor human, Ardipithecus reveals the surprising ancestry of both.

Authors:  Tim D White; C Owen Lovejoy; Berhane Asfaw; Joshua P Carlson; Gen Suwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Inferences regarding the diet of extinct hominins: structural and functional trends in dental and mandibular morphology within the hominin clade.

Authors:  Peter W Lucas; Paul J Constantino; Bernard A Wood
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  The facial skeleton of the chimpanzee-human last common ancestor.

Authors:  Samuel N Cobb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology.

Authors:  B Wood; B G Richmond
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  An evolutionary life-history framework for understanding sex differences in human mortality rates.

Authors:  Daniel J Kruger; Randolph M Nesse
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2006-03

9.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

10.  Unraveling the evolution of uniquely human cognition.

Authors:  Evan L MacLean
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.