Literature DB >> 1580353

Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates.

J M Plavcan1, C P van Schaik.   

Abstract

A number of factors, including sexual selection, body weight, body-weight dimorphism, predation, diet, and phylogenetic inertia have been proposed as influences on the evolution of canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. Although these factors are not mutually exclusive, opinions vary as to which is the most important. The role of sexual selection has been questioned because mating system, which should reflect its strength, poorly predicts variation in canine dimorphism, particularly among polygynous species. Kay et al. (1988) demonstrate that a more refined estimate of intermale competition explains a large proportion of the variation in canine dimorphism in platyrrhine primates. We expand their analysis, developing a more generalized measure of intermale competition based on the frequency and intensity of male-male agonism. We examine the relative influences of predation (inferred by substrate use), female body weight, body-weight dimorphism, diet, and sexual selection on the evolution of anthropoid canine dimorphism. Intermale competition is very strongly associated with canine dimorphism. Predation also has a marked effect on canine dimorphism, in that savanna-dwelling species consistently show greater canine dimorphism than other species, all other factors being held equal. Body-weight dimorphism is also strongly associated with canine dimorphism, though apparently through a common selective basis, rather than through allometric effects. Body weight seems to play only a minor, indirect role in the evolution of canine dimorphism. Diet plays no role. Likewise, we find little evidence that phylogenetic inertia is a constraint on the evolution of canine dimorphism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1580353     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330870407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  30 in total

1.  Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early modern humans but not in Australopithecus.

Authors:  Emma Nelson; Campbell Rolian; Lisa Cashmore; Susanne Shultz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The facial skeleton of the chimpanzee-human last common ancestor.

Authors:  Samuel N Cobb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

4.  Quantitative genetics provides predictive power for paleontological studies of morphological evolution.

Authors:  P David Polly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  [Lemurs of Madagascar. Tests on evolution of primate communities].

Authors:  J U Ganzhorn; P M Kappeler
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1993-05

6.  Wide faces or large canines? The attractive versus the aggressive primate.

Authors:  Eleanor M Weston; Adrian E Friday; Rufus A Johnstone; Friedemann Schrenk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Canine sexual dimorphism in Egyptian Eocene anthropoid primates: Catopithecus and Proteopithecus.

Authors:  E L Simons; J M Plavcan; J G Fleagle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sexual dimorphism in primate aerobic capacity: a phylogenetic test.

Authors:  Patrik Lindenfors; L J Revell; C L Nunn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Additive genetic variation in the craniofacial skeleton of baboons (genus Papio) and its relationship to body and cranial size.

Authors:  Jessica L Joganic; Katherine E Willmore; Joan T Richtsmeier; Kenneth M Weiss; Michael C Mahaney; Jeffrey Rogers; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 10.  Why are there apes? Evidence for the co-evolution of ape and monkey ecomorphology.

Authors:  Kevin D Hunt
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.