| Literature DB >> 34692835 |
Reza Kalantari1, Zahra Zamanian1, Mehdi Hasanshahi2, Seyed Aliakbar Faghihi3, Jamshid Jamali4, Hadi Niakan5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nontechnical skills are necessary for clinicians' safe performance and prevention of errors in the operating room. Educational intervention is a useful way to improve these skills, which are a vital area for improvement. Circulating nurses are surgical team members whose work depends heavily on using nontechnical skills. This study is aimed at assessing the effect of an educational intervention on the improvement of circulating nurses' nontechnical skills.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34692835 PMCID: PMC8536428 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5856730
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1The study design flowchart.
Circulating nurse's nontechnical skills framework.
| Nontechnical skill domain | Elements |
|---|---|
| Task management | Maintaining operating room standards |
| Coping with stress | |
| Proper planning and preparing the setting | |
| Teamwork | Cooperation |
| Coordination | |
| Situational awareness | Checking the necessary elements |
| Seeking the process of surgery | |
| Anticipation | |
| Communication | Exchange information |
| Communication management | |
| Leadership | Assertiveness |
| Controlling the operating room situation |
The description of the rating scale for the CPLINTS items.
| Score | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Necessary but not observed | The behavior is necessary but does not take place at all. |
| 1 | Poor | Performance is not acceptable and can potentially endanger patient safety; remedial action is required. |
| 2 | Marginal | Performance indicates reasons for concern; considerable improvement is needed. |
| 3 | Acceptable | Performance is of a satisfactory standard but can be improved. |
| 4 | Excellent | Performance is of a high standard level and enhances patient safety. |
| Not applicable | NA | The behavior is not needed during surgery. |
The demographics of the study population.
| Variable | No intervention group | Intervention group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)∗ | 31 (10) | 33 (11) | |
| Work experience (years)∗ | 8 (12) | 10 (12) | |
| Gender∗∗ | Male | 70 (46.66%) | 67 (44.66%) |
| Female | 80 (53.34%) | 83 (55.34%) | |
| Education level∗∗ | Associate degree | 40 (26.66%) | 35 (23.33%) |
| Bachelor's degree | 98 (65.34%) | 105 (70%) | |
| Master's degree | 12 (8%) | 10 (6.67%) | |
∗Median (interquartile range). ∗∗Frequency (percent).
Comparison of the scores of different nontechnical skills within groups and postintervention scores between groups.
| Domain | No intervention group | Intervention group | Mann–Whitney | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Difference | Before | After | Difference |
|
| |
| Task management | 2.15 (0.38) | 2.21 (0.45) | 0.06 (0.31) | 2.07 (0.54) | 2.71 (0.31) | 0.64 (0.53) | 9.12∗∗ | <0.001∗∗∗ |
| Teamwork | 2.14 (0.57) | 2.14 (0.50) | 0.00 (0.29) | 2.00 (0.62) | 2.85 (0.43) | 0.84 (0.48) | 8.64∗∗ | <0.001∗∗∗ |
| Situational awareness | 2.57 (0.57) | 2.42 (0.42) | -0.14 (0.44) | 2.57 (0.29) | 3.00 (0.43) | 0.42 (0.29) | 9.48∗∗ | <0.001∗∗∗ |
| Communication | 2.25 (0.38) | 2.45 (0.38) | 0.20 (0.55) | 2.37 (0.40) | 3.00 (0.56) | 0.62 (0.44) | 9.21∗∗ | <0.001∗∗∗ |
| Leadership | 1.71 (0.38) | 1.82 (0.31) | 0.11 (0.32) | 1.75 (0.63) | 2.12 (0.33) | 0.37 (0.83) | 7.05∗∗ | <0.001∗∗∗ |
| Overall score | 2.16 (0.18) | 2.26 (0.22) | 0.09 (0.41) | 2.14 (0.29) | 2.73 (0.33) | 0.59 (0.40) | 12.04∗∗ | <0.001∗∗∗ |
∗Interquartile range; ∗∗absolute value; ∗∗∗significant.
The improvement of the domains' scores in the intervention group.
| Nontechnical skill domains | Improvement of scores |
|---|---|
| Task management | 30.9% |
| Teamwork | 42.5% |
| Situational awareness | 16.7% |
| Communication | 26.6% |
| Leadership | 21% |
| Overall score | 27.5% |