Philip H Pucher1, Rajesh Aggarwal2, Nicola Batrick3, Michael Jenkins4, Ara Darzi5. 1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: p.pucher@imperial.ac.uk. 2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. St Mary's Hospital Major Trauma Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK. 4. St Mary's Hospital Major Trauma Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK; Regional Vascular Unit, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK. 5. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute trauma management is a complex process, with the effective cooperation among multiple clinicians critical to success. Despite this, the effect of nontechnical skills on performance on outcomes has not been investigated previously in trauma. METHODS: Trauma calls in an urban, level 1 trauma center were observed directly. Nontechnical performance was measured using T-NOTECHS. Times to disposition and completion of assessment care processes were recorded, as well as any delays or errors. Statistical analysis assessed the effect of T-NOTECHS on performance and outcomes, accounting for Injury Severity Scores (ISS) and time of day as potential confounding factors. Meta-analysis was performed for incidence of delays. RESULTS: Fifty trauma calls were observed, with an ISS of 13 (interquartile range [IQR], 5-25); duration of stay 1 (IQR, 1-8) days; T-NOTECHS, 20.5 (IQR, 18-23); time to disposition, 24 minutes (IQR, 18-42). Trauma calls with low T-NOTECHS scores had a greater time to disposition: 35 minutes (IQR, 23-53) versus 20 (IQR, 16-25; P = .046). ISS showed a significant correlation to duration of stay (r = 0.736; P < .001), but not to T-NOTECHS (r = 0.201; P = .219) or time to disposition (r = 0.113; P = .494). There was no difference between "in-hours" and "out-of-hours" trauma calls for T-NOTECHS scores (21 [IQR, 18-22] vs 20 [IQR, 20-23]; P = .361), or time to disposition (34 minutes [IQR, 24-52] vs 17 [IQR, 15-27]; P = .419). Regression analysis revealed T-NOTECHS as the only factor associated with delays (odds ratio [OR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.95). CONCLUSION: Better teamwork and nontechnical performance are associated with significant decreases in disposition time, an important marker of quality in acute trauma care. Addressing team and nontechnical skills has the potential to improve patient assessment, treatment, and outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Acute trauma management is a complex process, with the effective cooperation among multiple clinicians critical to success. Despite this, the effect of nontechnical skills on performance on outcomes has not been investigated previously in trauma. METHODS:Trauma calls in an urban, level 1 trauma center were observed directly. Nontechnical performance was measured using T-NOTECHS. Times to disposition and completion of assessment care processes were recorded, as well as any delays or errors. Statistical analysis assessed the effect of T-NOTECHS on performance and outcomes, accounting for Injury Severity Scores (ISS) and time of day as potential confounding factors. Meta-analysis was performed for incidence of delays. RESULTS: Fifty trauma calls were observed, with an ISS of 13 (interquartile range [IQR], 5-25); duration of stay 1 (IQR, 1-8) days; T-NOTECHS, 20.5 (IQR, 18-23); time to disposition, 24 minutes (IQR, 18-42). Trauma calls with low T-NOTECHS scores had a greater time to disposition: 35 minutes (IQR, 23-53) versus 20 (IQR, 16-25; P = .046). ISS showed a significant correlation to duration of stay (r = 0.736; P < .001), but not to T-NOTECHS (r = 0.201; P = .219) or time to disposition (r = 0.113; P = .494). There was no difference between "in-hours" and "out-of-hours" trauma calls for T-NOTECHS scores (21 [IQR, 18-22] vs 20 [IQR, 20-23]; P = .361), or time to disposition (34 minutes [IQR, 24-52] vs 17 [IQR, 15-27]; P = .419). Regression analysis revealed T-NOTECHS as the only factor associated with delays (odds ratio [OR], 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.95). CONCLUSION: Better teamwork and nontechnical performance are associated with significant decreases in disposition time, an important marker of quality in acute trauma care. Addressing team and nontechnical skills has the potential to improve patient assessment, treatment, and outcomes.
Authors: Teodora Sorana Truta; Cristian Marius Boeriu; Marc Lazarovici; Irina Ban; Marius Petrişor; Sanda-Maria Copotoiu Journal: J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures) Date: 2018-10-01
Authors: Teodora Sorana Truta; Cristian Marius Boeriu; Sanda-Maria Copotoiu; Marius Petrisor; Emilia Turucz; Dan Vatau; Marc Lazarovici Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Michael Noonan; Alexander Olaussen; Joseph Mathew; Biswadev Mitra; De Villiers Smit; Mark Fitzgerald Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 2.430
Authors: Oscar E C van Maarseveen; Wietske H W Ham; Roel L N Huijsmans; Luke P H Leenen Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 2.374