Literature DB >> 23078681

Non-technical skills training to enhance patient safety: a systematic review.

Morris Gordon1, Daniel Darbyshire, Paul Baker.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Many quality improvement education programmes have been introduced over the last decade with the purpose of enhancing patient safety. The importance of non-technical skills training is becoming increasingly prominent, but the extent to which educational interventions have been used and the theoretical underpinnings of such interventions remain unclear. These issues were investigated through a systematic review of the literature.
METHODS: Any studies involving an educational intervention to improve non-technical skills amongst undergraduate or postgraduate staff in an acute health care environment were considered. A standardised search of online databases was carried out independently by two authors and consensus reached on the inclusion of studies. Data extraction and multimodal quality assessment were completed independently, followed by a content analysis of interventions and the extraction of key themes.
RESULTS: A total of 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Measured outcomes were variable, as was the strength of conclusions. Theoretical underpinning of interventions was not described in any studies. Content analysis revealed reasonable consistency with the emergence of five key themes: error; communication; teamwork and leadership; systems, and situational awareness. Teaching was often multidisciplinary and methods used included simulation and role-play exercises, and observation.
CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of published studies is reasonable, although the reporting of specific interventions is poor. Although a recognised model to support the design of patient safety education is lacking, a number of theories have been applied to guide educators in future instructional design. Further published work should clearly describe interventions and their theoretical underpinnings, and should aim to further explore which specific aspects of interventions are effective and why. Such research should also try to assess whether such interventions can impact patient outcomes. © Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23078681     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04343.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  56 in total

1.  Thinking like an expert: surgical decision making as a cyclical process of being aware.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Tavis Apramian; Meredith Vanstone; Lorelei Lingard; Michael Ott; Thomas Forbes; Richard Novick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Surgical Education, Simulation, and Simulators-Updating the Concept of Validity.

Authors:  Mitchell Goldenberg; Jason Y Lee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Evaluation of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures-a generic assessment tool developed through the Delphi method.

Authors:  Niklas Kahr Rasmussen; Leizl Joy Nayahangan; Jonathan Carlsen; Olle Ekberg; Knut Brabrand; Elisabeth Albrecht-Beste; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Non-technical skills in robotic surgery and impact on near-miss events: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Anthony Manuguerra; Charles Mazeaud; Nicolas Hubert; Pascal Eschwège; Mathieu Roumiguié; Julia Salleron; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Mindfulness fostering of interprofessional simulation training for collaborative practice.

Authors:  Matthew James Kerry; Douglas S Ander
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-06-15

6.  Checklist design and implementation: critical considerations to improve patient safety for low-frequency, high-risk patient events.

Authors:  Carman Turkelson; Megan Keiser; Gary Sculli; Diane Capoccia
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 7.  [Does simulator-based team training improve patient safety?].

Authors:  H Trentzsch; B Urban; B Sandmeyer; T Hammer; P C Strohm; M Lazarovici
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  Non-technical skills in minimally invasive surgery teams: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsten Gjeraa; Lene Spanager; Lars Konge; René H Petersen; Doris Østergaard
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Effective Senior Surgical Residents as Defined by Their Peers: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Nontechnical Skills Development.

Authors:  Taylor M Coe; Kristen M Jogerst; Emil Petrusa; Roy Phitayakorn; Jeremy Lipman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Simulation-based ureteroscopy skills training curriculum with integration of technical and non-technical skills: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Oliver Brunckhorst; Shahab Shahid; Abdullatif Aydin; Craig McIlhenny; Shahid Khan; Syed Johar Raza; Arun Sahai; James Brewin; Fernando Bello; Roger Kneebone; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.