| Literature DB >> 34686131 |
Yuanyuan Wang1, Lingbo Ma2, Jian He1, Zixuan Liu1, Shaoping Weng3, Lumin Wang2, Jianguo He1,3, Changjun Guo4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extremophiles have attracted much attention in the last few decades, as they possess different properties by producing certain useful metabolites. However, the secondary metabolism of the extremophiles of Antarctic krill has received little attention.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctic krill; Extremophiles; Genomic analysis; Planococcus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34686131 PMCID: PMC8532331 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02347-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1The NJ tree shows Planococcus sp. at the position of concerned taxa on the 16S rRNA gene. Bootstrap values of ≥70% were shown at nodes
Fig. 2a Transmission electron micrograph showing exponentially growing cells of strain MSAK28401T. Bar, 1 μm. b Temperature growth curve of isolates. The abscissa is different temperatures, the ordinate is the absorbance value of OD600nm
Differential phenotypic characteristics of Planococcus sp. and closely related Planococcus species
| Characteristic | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4a,b |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dextrin | – | + | + | -a |
| D-Cellobiose | – | – | + | -a |
| D-Turanose | + | + | + | NR |
| α-D-Lactose | – | + | + | -a |
| D-Melibiose | – | + | – | +a |
| β-Methyl-D-Glucoside | – | + | + | NR |
| α-D-Glucose | – | – | + | +a |
| D-Mannose | + | + | + | -a |
| D-Fructose | – | + | + | +a |
| D-Galactose | + | + | + | -a |
| 3-Methyl Glucose | + | + | + | NR |
| D-Sorbitol | + | + | + | NR |
| D-Mannitol | + | + | + | -a |
| D-Arabitol | – | + | – | NR |
| D-Glucose-6-PO4 | – | + | – | NR |
| D-Aspartic Acid | – | + | + | +b |
| L-Alanine | – | + | + | -a |
| L-Arginine | – | + | + | +a |
| L-Aspartic Acid | – | – | + | NR |
| L-Glutamic Acid | – | + | + | -a |
| L-Pyroglutamic Acid | – | + | – | NR |
| D-Galacturonic Acid | – | + | – | +b |
| L-Galactonic Acid Lactone | – | + | + | NR |
| D-Gluconic Acid | + | + | + | NR |
| D-Glucuronic Acid | – | + | + | NR |
| Glucuronamid | – | + | + | -b |
| Quinic Acid | – | + | + | +b |
| D-Lactic Acid Methyl Ester | + | + | + | -a |
| L-Malic Acid | – | + | + | NR |
| Tween 40 | + | + | + | -b |
β-Hydroxy-D,L Butyric Acid | – | + | – | NR |
| α-Keto-Butyric Acid | – | + | – | NR |
| Acetoacetic Acid | + | + | + | NR |
| Propionic Acid | – | – | + | -b |
| Acetic Acid | + | + | + | NR |
| 1% NaCl | + | + | + | +a |
| 4% NaCl | + | + | – | +a |
| 8% NaCl | – | + | – | +a |
| Tetrazolium Violet | + | – | – | NR |
| Nalidixic Acid | – | + | – | -a |
| Lithium Chloride | + | + | + | NR |
| Aztreonam | + | + | + | NR |
1:MSAK28401T (data from this study), 2:P. citreus DSM 20549T, 3: P. rifietoensis M8T, 4: P. maitriensis S1T. (Alam et al., 2003; Suresh et al. 2007; Gan et al., 2018). +, Present; −, absent, NR, not reported
Cellular fatty acid composition of Planococcus sp. and P. citreus DSM 20549T, P. rifietoensis M8T, and P. maitriensis S1T
| Fatty acids | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4a,b,c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C12:0 | 1.29 ± 0.37 | 1.14 ± 0.57 | 2.57 ± 1.29 | – |
| C14:0 iso | 7.80 ± 0.18 | 1.41 ± 0.85 | 9.26 ± 0.17 | – |
| C15:0 anteiso | 37.67 ± 0.90 | 44.22 ± 5.39 | 37.28 ± 1.60 | 27.3 ± 2.05 |
| C15:0 iso | 6.44 ± 0.47 | 0.66 ± 0.54 | 3.51 ± 0.57 | 2.8 ± 1.62 |
| C16:0 | 1.33 ± 0.21 | 7.15 ± 1.13 | 1.96 ± 0.63 | 7.2 ± 1.11 |
| C16:0 iso | 9.36 ± 0.71 | 5.89 ± 1.45 | 9.05 ± 3.38 | 9.2 ± 3.33 |
| C16:1 ω11c | 1.38 ± 0.07 | 2.35 ± 0.94 | 1.49 ± 0.25 | – |
| C16:1 ω7c alcohol | 10.37 ± 1.22 | 3.62 ± 0.59 | 9.91 ± 0.68 | N |
| C17:0 | 2.14 ± 0.66 | 3.03 ± 1.04 | 2.14 ± 0.24 | 5.3 ± 1.03 |
| C17:0 10-methyl | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.09 | 0.50 ± 0.16 | N |
| C17:0 anteiso | 5.76 ± 0.47 | 14.18 ± 0.72 | 5.84 ± 1.05 | 6.6 ± 1.61 |
| C17:0 iso | 2.41 ± 0.29 | 0.53 ± 0.56 | 1.58 ± 0.34 | N |
| C17:1 iso I/anteiso B | 2.03 ± 0.34 | 4.31 ± 0.31 | 2.96 ± 2.06 | N |
| C17:1 iso ω10c | 1.25 ± 0.07 | 0.28 ± 0.00 | 1.16 ± 0.32 | N |
| C17:1 ω9c | 2.92 ± 0.15 | 0.64 ± 0.00 | 3.95 ± 1.83 | N |
| C18:0 | 0.53 ± 0.12 | 4.71 ± 1.22 | 1.01 ± 0.93 | 4.0 ± 1.05 |
| C18:0 iso | 1.61 ± 0.02 | 1.46 ± 0.50 | 2.29 ± 0.63 | 3.1 ± 1.55 |
| C18:1 ω9c | 1.04 ± 0.36 | 1.13 ± 0.45 | 1.33 ± 0.41 | 4.2 ± 1.70 |
| C19:0 anteiso | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 0.89 ± 0.17 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | N |
All values< 0.5% are not shown;
All the strains were tested under the same growth conditions
1 MSAK28401T. 2 P. citreus DSM 20549T, 3 P. rifietoensis M8T,4 P. maitriensis S1T,
– not detected, N none data
a Data from: Alam et al.(2003); b Data from:Gan et al.(2018); c Data from: Suresh Gan et al.(2007)
Genome statistics of the Planococcus sp.
| Attribute | Value | % of total |
|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 3,930,779 | 100.00 |
| DNA coding region (bp) | 3,380,475 | 86.00 |
| DNA G + C (bp) | 1,631,417 | 47.15 |
| DNA scaffolds | 10 | – |
| Total genes | 3998 | 100.00 |
| Protein coding genes | 3835 | 95.92 |
| RNA gene | 101 | 2.53 |
| Pseudo genes | 62 | 1.55 |
| Gene with function prediction | 3258 | |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 2765 | 69.16 |
| Genes assigned Pfam domains | 10 | 0.25 |
| Genes with signal peptides | 169 | 4.23 |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 1123 | 28.09 |
| CRISPR repeats | 219 | 5.45 |
aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome
Fig. 3A draft map of whole-genome and distribution of annotated genes of strain Planococcus MSAK28401T sp. a Genomic circle diagram of a new strain MSAK28401T. b Annotate Planococcus sp. genome information using RAST server
Fig. 4CAZy and KEGG annotation class distribution. a CAZy annotation classification distribution map. The abscissa is the CAZy classification, and the ordinate is the number of genes annotated to the corresponding classification. b KEGG annotation statistics chart at Level 2. The horizontal axis is the number of genes, the vertical axis represents the name of the Level 2 pathway, and the number on the right side of the column is the number of genes annotated to the Level 2 pathway. c Aromatic hydrocarbon degradation pathways involved in isolates
Fig. 5The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the whole genome using the Genome-BLAST distance phylogenetic method (GBDP) tool. According to the GBDP distance formula d5, the branch lengths were scaled
The dDDH values are provided along with their confidence intervals (C.I.) for the GBDP formula 2
| Query | Subject | d4 | C.I. d4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSAK28401T | ATCC BAA-790 | 42.8 | [40.3–45.4] |
| MSAK28401T | DSM 20549 | 42.3 | [39.8–44.9] |
| MSAK28401T | S1 | 35.7 | [33.3–38.3] |
| MSAK28401T | DSM 23997 | 34.0 | [31.5–36.5] |
| MSAK28401T | DSM 17275 | 29.7 | [27.4–32.2] |
Calculated ANIb values for available genomes of the type strains from the type species of the genera included in the genus Planococcus (the accession numbers for these genomes are in parentheses)
| Species | DSM 14505 | DSM 22276 | DSM 20549 | DSM 24743 | ATCC 43650 | 17275 | S1 | DSM 23997 | M8 | ISL-16 | PAMC 21323 | L10.15 | SCU63 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | ||||||||||||||
| DSM 14505T | 72.95 | 100 | ||||||||||||
| DSM 22276T | 72.07 | 79.62 | 100 | |||||||||||
| DSM 20549T | 90.31 | 72.44 | 71.27 | 100 | ||||||||||
| DSM 24743T | 72.04 | 80.17 | 88.82 | 72.01 | 100 | |||||||||
| ATCC 43650T | 72.09 | 81.52 | 80.90 | 72.03 | 81.63 | 100 | ||||||||
| 17275T | 84.92 | 72..73 | 72.12 | 85.04 | 72.27 | 72.36 | 100 | |||||||
| S1T | 87.86 | 72.30 | 71.07 | 89.22 | 71.11 | 71.25 | 83.85 | 100 | ||||||
| DSM 23997T | 87.07 | 72.57 | 71.56 | 87.83 | 71.55 | 71.66 | 83.59 | 88.93 | 100 | |||||
| M8T | 90.49 | 72.74 | 71.75 | 92.26 | 71.88 | 72.01 | 84.58 | 88.51 | 87.36 | 100 | ||||
| ISL-16T | 72.59 | 73.09 | 71.78 | 72.50 | 71.93 | 72.15 | 72.08 | 72.76 | 72.50 | 72.46 | 100 | |||
| PAMC 21323 | 71.99 | 79.50 | 85.59 | 71.75 | 86.72 | 81.10 | 72.13 | 71.59 | 71.52 | 71.78 | 72.13 | 100 | ||
| L10.15T | 71.77 | 79.70 | 80.76 | 71.53 | 81.16 | 81.85 | 71.91 | 71.32 | 71.14 | 71.68 | 71.89 | 81.25 | 100 | |
| SCU63T | 72.34 | 72.86 | 72.22 | 72.22 | 72.22 | 72.33 | 71.97 | 72.48 | 72.26 | 72.36 | 80.83 | 72.15 | 72.00 | 100 |
Planococcus sp. Planococcus antarcticus DSM 14505T, Planococcus donghaensis DSM 22276T, Planococcus citreus DSM 20549T, Planococcus halocryophilus DSM 24743T, Planococcus kocurii ATCC 43650T, Planococc maritimus 17275T, Planococcus maitriensis S1T, Planococcus plakortidis DSM 23997T, Planococcus rifietoensis M8T, Planococcus salinarum ISL-16T, Planococcus sp. PAMC 21323, Planococcus versutus L10.15T, Planococcus halotolerans SCU63T
Fig. 6The Venn diagram and the bar graph depict the comparative genomics among the genomes of P. alpniumensis MSAK28401T, P. citreus DSM 20549T, and P. rifietoensis M8T, showing shared and unshared orthologous genes clusters
Fig. 7Secondary metabolism and genomic islands analysis in MSAK28401T genome. a antiSMASH predicted biosynthetic gene clusters. b The predicts Genomic Islands (GIs) of the strain MSAK28401T. The red represents the prediction by integrated approach; blue displays results via IslandPath-DIMOB; orange represents genomic islands predicted using SIGI-HMM.