| Literature DB >> 34685585 |
Andreas Goette1,2, Uwe Lendeckel3.
Abstract
Around the world there are 33.5 million patients suffering from atrial fibrillation (AF) with an annual increase of 5 million cases. Most AF patients have an established form of an atrial cardiomyopathy. The concept of atrial cardiomyopathy was introduced in 2016. Thus, therapy of underlying diseases and atrial tissue changes appear as a cornerstone of AF therapy. Furthermore, therapy or prevention of atrial endocardial changes has the potential to reduce atrial thrombogenesis and thereby cerebral stroke. The present manuscript will summarize the underlying pathophysiology and remodeling processes observed in the development of an atrial cardiomyopathy, thrombogenesis, and atrial fibrillation. In particular, the impact of oxidative stress, inflammation, diabetes, and obesity will be addressed.Entities:
Keywords: atrial fibrillation; cardiomyopathy; inflammation; molecular biology; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34685585 PMCID: PMC8533786 DOI: 10.3390/cells10102605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Association between atrial fibrillation (AF) with cellular calcium overload, shortening of the action potential, oxidative stress (reactive oxygen species; ROS) and activation/expression of several pathways and genes, which interfere with cellular morphology/function and atrial thrombogenesis. Angiotensin II can modify several effects through activation of the AT1 receptor. Activation of different Mitogen activated kinases (MAP kinases) induce several cellular effects including cellular hypertrophy. In addition, calcium-activated phosphatases (calcineurin) and protease (calpain I) induce structural cellular changes. Oxidative stress is counterbalanced to some extent by activation of the antioxidant response element (ARE) and generation of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione (GSH), glutathione peroxidase (GPX). NRF2 = nuclear factor-erythroid-2-related factor, Keap1 = Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1.
Figure 2Interaction of atrial fibrillation (AF), CaMKII (Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-II), and NLRP3 (NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein 3)-inflammasome.
Figure 3Impact of type of atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal AF, persistent AF) on clinical outcome. The recent hypothesis is that the burden of AF contributes to differences in the occurrence of specific clinical events such as cognitive decline, stroke, or myocardial infarction. At the molecular level, differences can be explained by activation of a difference in cellular oxidative stress pathways, which are regulated or counter-regulated during the course of an AF episode. Impact of type of atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal AF, persistent AF) on clinical outcome. The recent hypothesis is that the burden AF contributes to differences in the occurrence of specific clinical events such as cognitive decline, stroke or myocardial infarction. At the molecular level, differences can be explained by activation of difference cellular oxidative stress pathways, which are regulated or counter-regulated during the course of an AF episode. Diseases or conditions such as diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, heart failure, ageing, sex, and vascular diseases are summarized in the CHA2DS2VASc Score. Impact of type of atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal AF, persistent AF) on clinical outcome. The recent hypothesis is that the burden of AF contributes to differences in the occurrence of specific clinical events such as cognitive decline, stroke or myocardial infarction. At the molecular level, differences can be explained by activation of differences in cellular oxidative stress pathways, which are regulated or counter-regulated during the course of an AF episode.