| Literature DB >> 34685545 |
Maryam Lale Ataei1,2, Mohammad Karimipour2, Parviz Shahabi3,4, Roghiyeh Pashaei-Asl5, Esmaeil Ebrahimie6,7,8,9, Maryam Pashaiasl2,10,11,12.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition within the neural system which is clinically manifested by sensory-motor dysfunction, leading, in some cases, to neural paralysis for the rest of the patient's life. In the current study, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were isolated from the human amniotic fluid, in order to study their juxtacrine and paracrine activities. Flow cytometry analysis was performed to identify the MSCs. A conditioned medium (CM) was collected to measure the level of BDNF, IL-1β, and IL-6 proteins using the ELISA assay. Following the SCI induction, MSCs and CM were injected into the lesion site, and also CM was infused intraperitoneally in the different groups. Two weeks after SCI induction, the spinal cord samples were examined to evaluate the expression of the doublecortin (DCX) and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) markers using immunofluorescence staining. The MSCs' phenotype was confirmed upon the expression and un-expression of the related CD markers. Our results show that MSCs increased the expression level of the DCX and decreased the level of the GFAP relative to the injury group (p < 0.001). Additionally, the CM promoted the DCX expression rate (p < 0.001) and decreased the GFAP expression rate (p < 0.01) as compared with the injury group. Noteworthily, the restorative potential of the MSCs was higher than that of the CM (p < 0.01). Large-scale meta-analysis of transcriptomic data highlighted PAK5, ST8SIA3, and NRXN1 as positively coexpressed genes with DCX. These genes are involved in neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. Overall, our data revealed that both therapeutic interventions could promote the regeneration and restoration of the damaged neural tissue by increasing the rate of neuroblasts and decreasing the astrocytes.Entities:
Keywords: conditioned medium spinal cord injury; human amniotic fluid; mesenchymal stem cells; neural regeneration; transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34685545 PMCID: PMC8534241 DOI: 10.3390/cells10102565
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1(A) Laminectomy of the spinal cord, (B) using the Horizons Impactor device, (C) after spinal cord injury and the formation of a hematoma.
Figure 2Cultivation and characterization of MSCs. (A) 1 shows P0 of cells after one week of the first culture; 2 shows P1 of cells after three days; 3 shows P1 of cells after one week (40× magnification was used). (B) Flow cytometry of hAF-MSCs for surface markers. Expression of surface markers detected by flow cytometric analysis in P4 of MSCs, with CD73 and CD105 as positive markers and CD14 and CD45 as negative markers for hAF-MSCs.
The measurement of BDNF, IL-1β, IL-6 in CM.
| BDNF | IL-1β | IL-6 |
|---|---|---|
| 24 ± 0/375 pg/mL | 12 ± 0/73 pg/mL | 10 ± 0/562 pg/mL |
Figure 3Immunofluorescence staining two weeks’ post-injury for DCX. (A) The double staining of DCX for the effect of hAFMSC-CM on DCX in spinal cord injury by confocal microscopy. DCX-positive neuroblasts (green, 2 weeks’ post-injury) were detected in the spinal cord. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI(blue). After SCI treatment with CM in the form of IP and Focal, stem cells showed an increase in DCX (p < 0.001). Data represent means ± SEM. Scale bars = 20 µm. (B), the quantification of immunostaining data showed an increase in DCX cells in different groups. $$$ p < 0.001, $$ p < 0.01, $ p < 0.05 versus control. ### p < 0.001, ## p < 0.01, versus injury. *** p < 0.001, versus CM-IP. @@ p < 0.01, versus CM-Focal.
Figure 4Immunofluorescence staining within two weeks’ post-injury for GFAP. (A) The double staining of GFAP for the effect of hAFMSCs-CM on GFAP in spinal cord injury by confocal microscopy. GFAP-positive astrocytes (red, 2 weeks’ post-injury) is detected in the spinal cord. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). After SCI treatment with CM in the form of IP and Focal, the stem cells showed a significant decrease in GFAP (p < 0.001). Data represent means ± SEM. Scale bars = 20 µm. (B) The quantification of immunostaining data showed a decrease in GFAP cells within different groups. $$$ p < 0.001, versus control. ### p < 0.001, versus injury. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, versus CM-IP. @ p < 0.05 versus CM-Focal.
Top 10 coexpressed genes with DCX revealed by meta-analysis of publicly available transcriptomic data.
| Genes | Name | Meta-Analysis Based Correlation (%) | Number of Experiments Used for Identifying Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 5° | 28.7% | 20 |
|
| ELAV like RNA binding protein 4 | 43.7% | 20 |
|
| calpain 6 | 19.3% | 22 |
|
| neurexin 1° | 34.0% | 28 |
|
| °ST8 alpha-N-acetyl-neuraminide alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 3 | 33.0% | 35 |
|
| nucleolar protein 4 | 30.7% | 22 |
|
| glutamate ionotropic receptor AMPA type subunit 2 | 28.9% | 16 |
|
| unc-80 homolog, NALCN channel complex subunit | 33.3% | 21 |
|
| serine/arginine repetitive matrix 4 | 32.6% | 31 |
|
| solute carrier family 17 member 6° | 30.2% | 20 |
Figure 5Gene interaction network analysis of DCX. Genes with high level of positive coexpression with DCX, based on meta-analysis, are highlighted.