Literature DB >> 34682104

A National Population Cohort Study Showed That Exposure to General Anesthesia in Early Childhood Is Associated with an Increase in the Risk of Developmental Delay.

Ya-Ling Yang1, Liang-Jen Wang2, Jung-Chan Chang3, Shu-Chen Ho4, Ho-Chang Kuo5,6.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between exposure to general anesthesia (GA) and the risk of cognitive and mental disorders. This study has thus investigated the relationships between exposure to GA before the age of 3 and subsequent cognitive and mental disorders in a national-wide research sample. We obtained our subjects from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, which was based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). Children in the hospital aged less than 3 years old were included if there was GA exposure or not during the period of year 1997 to 2008. Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for potential confounding factors were used to estimate the relative magnitude of the risk associated with GA exposure. The cohort contained 2261 subjects with GA and 4522 children without GA as a comparison group. GA exposure group had a higher rate of developmental delay than in the without GA group (hazard ratio 1.46, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of ADHD, autism and intellectual disability between the GA-exposed group and the comparison cohort. In conclusion, this study reported that children exposed to GA early before the age of three had a small association with increased risk of development delay thereafter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  developmental delay; developmental dyslexia; general anesthesia

Year:  2021        PMID: 34682104      PMCID: PMC8534755          DOI: 10.3390/children8100840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Children (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9067


1. Introduction

The medical community is concerned that exposure to certain types of inhaled anesthetics in the early life of animals can enhance immature neuron apoptosis [1], and that such animals might also develop degenerative changes leading to neurocognitive dysfunction [2] and memory [3]. There is increasing evidence that type A gamma-amino butyric acid (GABAA) receptors, which is excitatory rather than inhibitory in the immature neurons, are the main target of sevoflurane. Moreover, sevoflurane is the main inhalation anesthetic used in pediatric surgery [2,4] due to its pleasant odor [5], and it also exerts a protecting effect against bronchoconstriction [6]. The excitotoxic effects of GABAA receptors are related to the increase in neuronal apoptosis after exposure to sevoflurane in animals, which might contribute to sevoflurane-induced subsequent cognitive dysfunction [2]. Besides, it also interferes with dendritic cells development and synaptogenesis, potentially causing cognitive impairment [7]. These pre-clinical literatures have shown changes in neuronal apoptosis that may lead to post-anesthesia cognitive dysfunction [8,9,10]. In addition, sevoflurane can also manipulate memory genes and induce cognitive impairment in aged rodents [11]. More importantly, whether these biological findings of neuronal damage in animal studies will occur in children has become an important issue in the daily anesthesia practice of children. Up to now, although there are many different related studies, the relationships between early childhood exposure to general anesthesia (GA) and the risk of developing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) disorders are still under debate [12,13]. However, meta-analysis showed that among children undergoing anesthesia/surgery in early childhood, especially children exposed to anesthesia for multiple times, the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes was moderately increased [14,15]. Thus, we conduct this nationwide cohort study of children under the age of 3, and investigated the relationships between their GA exposure and subsequent cognitive and mental disorders.

2. Methods

As stated in our previous report [16], our research subjects were selected from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, which is based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM). The National Health Insurance plan provides compulsory universal health insurance for 99% of Taiwan’s 23.74 million residents [17]. Previous studies have described the details of the NHIRD, which consists of a representative database of 1,000,000 randomly sampled subjects and their medical information, including inpatient and outpatient facilities, drug prescriptions, insurance gender, date of birth, date of visit or hospitalization and diagnosis [18,19]. Included in our study sample were children younger than 3 years old who were admitted into hospitals between 1997 and 2008, with or without exposure to general inhalation of anaesthetics. Excluded were those cases with any premature birth (ICD-9-CM 765), brain malignant tumors (ICD-9-CM 191), brain benign tumors (ICD-9-CM 225), other congenital system abnormalities (ICD-9-CM 742), (epilepsy ICD-9-CM 345) and pediatric cerebral palsy (ICD-9-CM 343). Moreover, those who had been diagnosed prior to GA exposure with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (ICD-9-CM 314), developmental delay (DD), unspecified (ICD-9-CM 315), autism spectrum disorder (ASD) (Patients with ICD-9-CM 299), tic disorder (ICD-9-CM code 307.2) and intellectual disability (ICD-9-CM 317 to 319) were also removed from this study. According to the management they had received, these patients were divided into two groups: One group was hospitalized patients who had received general anesthesia (GA) and the other group was non-GA-exposed comparison cohorts (matched by age and gender) admitted to the hospital during the same period (±7 days). The comparison-to-study ratio used in this study was 1:2. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to compare between GA-exposed and non-GA-exposed children under 1 year old during the entire follow-up period, the subsequent risk of mental illness including ADHD, developmental delay, unspecified, autism spectrum disorder, tic disorder and intellectual disability. The observation period started on the index day and ended on the day of child’s psychiatric diagnosis or on December 31, 2013. The length of follow-up time was calculated for each patient diagnosed with one of psychiatric diseases. The age and comorbidity of allergic diseases including asthma (ICD-9 493), allergic rhinitis (ICD-9 CM 477) and atopic dermatitis (ICD-9-CM 691) were collected for adjustment. The data collection flow chart is shown in Figure 1. This study using one of the aforementioned databases was exempt from the full review by the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital’s Institutional Re-view Board (IRB No. 102-0364B), as any patient’s ID number in the database is encrypted to protect his or her privacy [20].
Figure 1

Algorithm for study design and patient selection.

Statistical Analysis

The number of follow-up person-years for each patient was calculated from the date of diagnosis of mental illness to the date of death, or 31 December 2013. The incidence rates were calculated by dividing the number of cases of mentally ill patients by the number of follow-up person-years. Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for potential confounders were used to estimate the relative magnitude of risk associated with GA exposure. Participants were divided into two groups: GA exposure or non-GA cohorts. The GA exposure cohort was further divided into mask anesthesia and intubation anesthesia. Hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using non-GA patients as a reference. SAS statistical software package (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for analysis. All statistical tests were bidirectional. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Algorithm for Study Design General Characteristics of the Research Objects

From the NHIRD, 43,377 children below the age of three who were hospitalized between 1997 and 2008 were included in this study cohort. The flowchart of this research is shown in Figure 1. Among them, 2545 subjects and 4080 person times were exposed to GA. After exclusion of 284 (11.16%) subjects (premature birth, brain malignant tumors, brain benign tumors, other congenital system abnormalities, epilepsy and pediatric cerebral palsy, as well as those who had been diagnosed prior to general anaesthesia exposure with ADHD, developmental delay, ASD, tic disorder and intellectual disability), there were 2261 subjects in the study cohort, while 4522 children (in a 1:2 ratio, matched with age, sex and time) made up the comparison cohort (Table 1).
Table 1

General characteristics of the research objects.

VariablesInpatients without Anesthesia Use(n = 4522)Inpatients with Anesthesia Use(n = 2261)HR (95% CI)p Value
n % n %
Age (means ± SD)1.90 ± 0.531.92 ± 0.60 0.1165
Gender
Female156234.5478134.54
Male296065.46148065.46
Follow-up (years, means ± SD)10.70 ± 3.6710.48 ± 3.85 0.0230
Neurodevelopmental disorders3838.4725211.151.32 (1.13~1.53)0.0004
ADHD1393.07672.960.96 (0.72~1.28)0.8025
Developmental delay3337.3623510.391.46 (1.22~1.74)<0.0001
Autism spectrum disorder430.95180.800.84 (0.48~1.45)0.5244
Tic disorders130.29----
Intellectual disabilities821.81492.171.20 (0.74~1.72)0.3182

Neurodevelopmental disorders indicate patients have one of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder, tic disorder and intellectual disability; hazard ratio (HR); confidence interval (CI).

3.2. Exposure to General Anesthesia in Early Childhood Has an Association of Increased Risk of Developmental Delay

It is worth noting that the incidence of neurodevelopmental disorders (one of ADHD, developmental delay, ASD, tic disorder and intellectual disability) in the GA-exposed group was higher than that in the non-GA group (11.15% vs. 8.47%, p = 0.0004), especially in developmental delay (10.39% vs. 7.36%, p < 0.0001). In our previous studies, we have found that allergic rhinitis in childhood may be associated with more symptoms of ADHD [21]; however, allergic diseases do not impair the cognitive development of children [22]. After adjustments for allergic diseases and age, it was still observed that the GA-exposed group had an associated with neurodevelopmental disorders (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.03–1.44), especially, in developmental delay (HR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.09–1.55) (Table 2). There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of ADHD, autism and intellectual disability between the GA-exposed group and the comparison cohort.
Table 2

Rates and hazard ratios of neurodevelopmental disorders in exposure to anesthesia before 3 years old.

Without Anesthesia Use (n = 4522)Anesthesia Use (n = 2261)
No. of neurodevelopmental disorders383252
Person time (years)48,402.8423,699.46
Incidence a791.281063.32
Crude HR (95%CI)1.001.33 (1.13~1.56)
Adjusted HR (95%CI) b1.001.22 (1.03~1.44)
No. of ADHD13967
Person time (years)50,554.9525,291.04
Incidence a274.95264.92
Crude HR (95%CI)1.000.96 (0.71~1.28)
Adjusted HR (95%CI) b1.000.94 (0.69~1.27)
No. of Developmental delay333235
Person time (years)48,713.6523,804.03
Incidence a683.59987.23
Crude HR (95%CI)1.001.46 (1.22~1.74)
Adjusted HR (95%CI) b1.001.30 (1.09~1.55)
No. of Autism spectrum disorder4318
Person time (years)51,148.7925,580.06
Incidence a84.0770.37
Crude HR (95%CI)1.000.84 (0.48~1.45)
Adjusted HR (95%CI) b1.000.72 (0.40~1.31)
No. of Intellectual disabilities8249
Person time (years)50,902.8925,396.13
Incidence a161.09192.94
Crude HR (95%CI)1.001.20 (0.74~1.72)
Adjusted HR (95%CI) b1.001.12 (0.76~1.65)

a per 1000 person-years; b adjustments for Allergic diseases and age. Neurodevelopmental disorders indicate patients have one of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), develop-mental delay, autism spectrum disorder, tic disorder and intellectual disability; hazard ratio (HR); confidence interval (CI).

4. Discussion

In this study, we reported that after adjustments for allergic diseases and age, a significant correlation between GA exposure and subsequent neurodevelopmental disorders was observed in a nationwide population-based cohort study. Meanwhile, our results indicated that GA exposure in children younger than 3 years old who were admitted into hospitals have no significant association with the later development of ADHD, autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disabilities. In Tsai et al.’s study, they have observed that children who have been exposed to GA for a long time before the age of 3 are more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD in the future [23]. It must be noted that the within-pair analysis suggested that anesthesia exposure was associated with a higher ADHD score [24] and the later ADHD are associated with prolonged or multiple exposure to anaesthetics [25]. Fortunately, some studies have concluded that children receiving anesthesia in utero [26], in their first 2 years life or later, are not more likely to develop ASD [27]. In addition, an international, multicenter, randomized, controlled equivalence trial has strongly evidenced that an hour of GA in early infancy does not change neurodevelopmental outcome and behavioral measures compared to awake-regional anaesthesia [28]. Our results also showed no significant association with the later development of ADHD, autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disabilities and GA exposure in early life of children. Consistent with the findings of Feng and Kobayashi et al., previous retrospective observational studies also found that children exposed to GA would have an increased risk of DD [29,30]. Compared with healthy siblings who were not exposed to anesthesia, there was no statistical difference in intelligence quotient scores in later childhood [31]. Recently, Robbins et al. have showed that GA for cesarean delivery was not associated with overall DD at two years of age [32]. A previous large-scale cohort study attempted to eliminate differences in socioeconomic and environmental factors, burden of heritable and lifestyle differences affecting children’s development, and showed that children who had GA for surgical procedures before entering primary school were not found to be at increased risk of adverse development outcomes compared with their biological siblings who did not have GA for surgery [33]. Furthermore, Nestor et al. showed no significant differences of psychiatric and neurologic outcomes with any for duration of GA, age at anesthesia, or induction and maintenance agents [34]. However, our study has some limitations that should be mentioned at this point. First, our study was a single-country study, and it still need additional worldwide studies to confirm the effect of GA on developmental delay. Second, it may indicate that children that need surgery itself may develop neurodevelopmental disorders, not necessarily just GA. In the future, additional matched groups are warranted for comparison who have GA only for diagnostic procedures, image studies or removal of foreign bodies such from ear, nose or esophagus, etc. without surgery or minor surgery (such as inguinal hernia, redundant prepuce, phimosis, dental procedure or tongue tie) with major surgery.

5. Conclusions

This report indicates that compared to matched hospitalized pediatric patients, children exposed to GA before the age of 3 may have a mild increase in the risk of developing developmental delays. Delaying general anesthesia for minor operations in this age group may be warranted to a decrease in long-term neurodevelopmental risk.
  34 in total

1.  Neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants undergoing general anesthesia.

Authors:  Kelsey A Nestor; Michelle Zeidan; Erin Boncore; Aaron Richardson; Gijo Alex; Michael Weiss; Saleem Islam
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  The role of general anesthesia on traits of neurodevelopmental disorders in a Swedish cohort of twins.

Authors:  Albert Castellheim; Sebastian Lundström; Mattias Molin; Ralf Kuja-Halkola; Carina Gillberg; Christopher Gillberg
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 8.982

3.  Risk of ADHD After Multiple Exposures to General Anesthesia: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chia-Jui Tsai; Charles Tzu-Chi Lee; Sophie Hsin-Yi Liang; Pei-Jung Tsai; Vincent Chin-Hung Chen; Michael Gossop
Journal:  J Atten Disord       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.256

4.  Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age after general anaesthesia or awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled equivalence trial.

Authors:  Mary Ellen McCann; Jurgen C de Graaff; Liam Dorris; Nicola Disma; Davinia Withington; Graham Bell; Anneke Grobler; Robyn Stargatt; Rodney W Hunt; Suzette J Sheppard; Jacki Marmor; Gaia Giribaldi; David C Bellinger; Penelope L Hartmann; Pollyanna Hardy; Geoff Frawley; Francesca Izzo; Britta S von Ungern Sternberg; Anne Lynn; Niall Wilton; Martin Mueller; David M Polaner; Anthony R Absalom; Peter Szmuk; Neil Morton; Charles Berde; Sulpicio Soriano; Andrew J Davidson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Age at Exposure to Surgery and Anesthesia in Children and Association With Mental Disorder Diagnosis.

Authors:  Caleb Ing; Ming Sun; Mark Olfson; Charles J DiMaggio; Lena S Sun; Melanie M Wall; Guohua Li
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  General anesthesia for cesarean delivery and childhood neurodevelopmental and perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L S Robbins; C T Blanchard; F J Biasini; M F Powell; B M Casey; A T Tita; L M Harper
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.603

7.  Efficacy of premedication with intranasal dexmedetomidine for removal of inhaled foreign bodies in children by flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Yanmei Bi; Yushan Ma; Juan Ni; Lan Wu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Allergic diseases do not impair the cognitive development of children but do damage the mental health of their caregivers.

Authors:  Ho-Chang Kuo; Ling-Sai Chang; Zi-Yu Tsai; Liang-Jen Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Integrated Excitatory/Inhibitory Imbalance and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals the Association between Dysregulated Synaptic Genes and Anesthetic-Induced Cognitive Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yasheng Yan; Sarah Logan; Xiaojie Liu; Bixuan Chen; Congshan Jiang; Thiago Arzua; Ramani Ramchandran; Qing-Song Liu; Xiaowen Bai
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 7.666

2.  General anesthesia in children and long-term neurodevelopmental deficits: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aoyi Xiao; Yingying Feng; Shan Yu; Chunli Xu; Jianghai Chen; Tingting Wang; Weimin Xiao
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.261

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.