| Literature DB >> 34681697 |
Piotr Tobiasz1, Filip Borys1,2, Marta Borecka1, Hanna Krawczyk1.
Abstract
The synthesis of photoswitchable azo-dibenzo[b,f]oxepine derivatives and microtubule inhibitors were described. Subsequently, we examined the reaction of methoxy derivative 3-nitrodibenzo[b,f]oxepine with different aldehydes and in the presence of BF3·OEt2 as a catalyst. Our study provided a very concise method for the construction of the azo-dibenzo[b,f]oxepine skeleton. The analysis of products was run using experimental and theoretical methods. Next, we evaluated the E/Z isomerization of azo-dibenzo[b,f]oxepine derivatives, which could be photochemically controlled using visible-wavelength light.Entities:
Keywords: azo-dibenzo[b,f]oxepine derivatives; photoisomerisation; tubulin inhibitor
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34681697 PMCID: PMC8539288 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Structure of colchicine, combretastatin A-4, dibenzo[b,f]oxepine and 1,2-bis(dibenzo[b,f]oxepin-3-yl)diazene.
Scheme 1Synthesis of 1,2-bis(dibenzo[b,f]oxepin-3-yl)diazene (2a–h).
Estimated binding free energy (kJ/mol) of 2a–2c and 2e–2f, isomers and .
| Compound | The Affinity of Isomer | The Affinity of Isomer | Δ Affinity (kJ/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| –13.9 | –12.3 | 1.6 |
|
| –13.5 | –14.2 | –0.7 |
|
| –14.2 | –13.5 | 0.7 |
|
| –12.8 | –12.4 | 0.4 |
|
| –13.4 | –12.4 | 1 |
Figure 23D model of the interaction between the isomers, (a) and (b), of (2f) and the colchicine binding site of α and β tubulin (crystal structure from PDB code: 1SA0).
Screening of reaction methods.
| Method | Conditions | Yield |
|---|---|---|
| NBS, DBU, CH2Cl2, Ar, −78 °C | 45% | |
| 0% | ||
| KMnO4, CuSO4·5H2O, CH2Cl2,24 h, rt | 20% | |
| KMnO4, CuSO4·5H2O, CH2Cl2, grinding | 10% | |
| (1) oxone, H2O, CH2Cl2(2) AcOH, TFA, toluene | 5% | |
| NCS, DBU, CH2Cl2, Ar, −78 °C | 45% | |
| NIS, DBU, CH2Cl2, Ar, −78 °C | 37% | |
| NCS, DBN, CH2Cl2, Ar, −78 °C | 10% | |
| NCS, KO | 20% | |
| KOH, DMF, N2, 150 °C | mixture |
Scheme 2Synthesis of compounds (4a–4e).
Carbon-13 chemical shifts for 3-nitrodibenzo[b,f]oxepine, substituent-induced chemical shifts for its methoxy substituted derivatives.
| R | C1 | C2 | C3 | C4 | C4′ | C5′ | C6 | C7 | C8 | C9 | C9′ | C10 | C11 | C11′ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Data from: H. Krawczyk, M. Wrzesiński, D. Mielecki, P. Szczeciński E. Grzesiuk, Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 3877–3884.
Synthesis of (5a–5f) from 3a.
| Compound 3 or 5 | R | Yield (%) of 5 |
|---|---|---|
|
| R1=NO2, R2=H, R3=H | 26% |
|
| R1=H, R2=NO2, R3=H | 36% |
|
| R1=NO2, R2=NO2, R3=H | 66% |
|
| R1=Cl, R2=H, R3=H | 9% |
|
| R1=Br, R2=Cl, R3=H | 14% |
|
| R1=NO2, R2=H, R3=NO2 | 43% |
Scheme 3Synthesis of compounds (6a–6b) and (8).
Figure 3UV/VIS spectra of compounds (2a, 2b, 2e–2g).
Figure 4The hypsochromic shift in UV/VIS spectra of compound (2f) upon irradiation with 365 nm.
Percentages of () (2a, 2b, 2e, 2g) isomers obtained from NMR spectra and at various PSSs (photostationary state) measured under constant illumination at the indicated wavelengths.
| Compound | Percent of ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 365 [nm] | 395 [nm] | 410 [nm] | 465 [nm] | ||
|
|
| 44 | 51 | 46 | 48 |
|
|
| 28 | 47 | 50 | 48 |
|
|
| 15 | 40 | 45 | 42 |
|
|
| 38 | 49 | 51 | 49 |
Figure 5Photoisomerization of compound (2e) measured by 1H NMR. Aromatic 1H NMR spectra in the dark-adapted state and at various PSSs measured under constant illumination at the indicated wavelengths.