| Literature DB >> 34678992 |
Jinyang Li1, Wenbo Wang1, Sifan Chen1, Tao Shao1, Xuxiong Tao1, Xianjun Yuan1.
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on fermentation quality, mycotoxin concentrations, and microbial communities of whole-crop corn silages infested with mycotoxigenic fungi. Cultured spores (106 cfu/mL) of mycotoxigenic Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium graminearum were sprayed (5 mL) on corn forage on 27 July and 10 August 2018. On 21 August 2018, sprayed (FI; 3 plots) and unsprayed (NFI; 3 plots) corn forage were harvested at the 1/2 kernel milk line stage, followed by chopping and ensiling without inoculants (CON), or with Lactobacillus buchneri (LB, 1 × 106 cfu/g FW), Lactobacillus plantarum (LT, 1 × 106 cfu/g FW), or L. buchneri + L. plantarum (BT: both L. buchneri and L. plantarum applied at 0.5 × 106 cfu/g FW). After 90 d of ensiling, FI silages had a higher (p < 0.05) pH value and higher acetic acid (ACA), ethanol, and ammonia nitrogen (ammonia N) concentrations, but lower (p < 0.05) lactic acid (LA) concentrations than NFI silage. The inoculants decreased pH and increased LA concentration and LA/ACA compared with CON. The aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) was only detected in FI fresh corn and silages; ensiling decreased (p < 0.05) AFB1 concentration compared with fresh corn, and LB and BT decreased AFB1 concentration compared with CON. The zearalenone (ZEN), deoxynivalenol (DON), and fumonisin B1 (FB1) concentrations were similar (p < 0.05) for NFI silages, while ZEN concentration in BT was the lowest (p < 0.05) among all FI silages; DON and FB1 concentrations in LB, LT, and BT silages were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those of CON in FI silages. The fungal infestation increased the bacterial and fungal diversity of silages compared with NFI silages. The FI silages had a higher relative abundance (RA) of Lactobacillus, Weissella, Wickerhamomyces, Pichia, and Epicoccum than the corresponding NFI silages. The RA of Aspergillus and Fusarium markedly decreased after 90 d of ensiling, and the inoculation expanded this trend irrespective of fungal infestation. The Penicillium in FI silages survived after 90 d of ensiling, while the inoculants decreased the RA of Penicillium. Inoculants mitigate the adverse effects of fungal infestation on corn silage quality by changing the bacterial and fungal communities.Entities:
Keywords: corn silage; fungi infestation; microbial community; mycotoxins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34678992 PMCID: PMC8537395 DOI: 10.3390/toxins13100699
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Microbial populations (log10 cfu/g FW basis) and chemical composition (g/kg DM basis unless stated otherwise) of fresh corn.
| Items | DM | WSC | CP | NDF | ADF | Starch | LAB | Yeasts and Molds | AB | Enterobacteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FI corn | 339 | 171 | 45.3 | 486 | 243 | 105 | 7.50 | 6.80 a | 8.37 | 6.17 |
| NFI corn | 333 | 177 | 50.7 | 567 | 203 | 112 | 7.20 | 4.37 b | 7.93 | 6.57 |
a,b Means within a row with different superscripts letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). FI, fungal infestation; NFI, non-fungal infestation. FW, fresh weight; DM, dry matter; WSC, water-soluble carbohydrates; CP, crude protein; CFU, colony-forming units; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; AB, aerobic bacteria; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber.
Effect of fungal infestation and inoculants on the pH, WSC, fermentation products (g/kg DM basis), and microbial populations (log10 cfu/g FW basis) of corn silage on day 90.
| Item | pH | Lactic | Acetic | Latic/ | Ethanol | WSC | Ammonia N | LAB | AB | Yeasts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FI | CON | 3.66 a | 88.2 bc | 29.0 ab | 3.04 c | 23.3 | 38.1 | 115 a | 3.87 | 0.00 a | 1.30 |
| LB | 3.64 ab | 95.1 abc | 30.8 a | 3.11 c | 23.5 | 33.0 | 110 ab | 3.25 | 2.43 a | 0.00 | |
| LT | 3.62 b | 88.6 bc | 26.7 b | 3.32 c | 22.5 | 39.1 | 104 ab | 2.87 | 1.67 a | 0.77 | |
| BT | 3.61 b | 98.3 abc | 27.1 b | 3.62 c | 23.4 | 36.4 | 100 b | 3.20 | 0.00 a | 0.33 | |
| NFI | CON | 3.57 c | 87.3 c | 16.0 c | 5.45 b | 24.4 | 41.8 | 71.1 c | 2.98 | 1.60 a | 0.33 |
| LB | 3.53 d | 106 a | 16.1 c | 6.58 a | 20.5 | 32.2 | 71.9 c | 2.93 | 1.10 a | 0.78 | |
| LT | 3.50 e | 105 a | 15.5 c | 6.82 a | 18.2 | 31.2 | 74.3 c | 2.97 | 0.00 a | 0.77 | |
| BT | 3.44 f | 104 ab | 16.0 c | 6.52 a | 18.1 | 30.4 | 66.9 c | 2.53 | 1.67 a | 0.00 | |
| Fungal infestation means | |||||||||||
| FI | 3.63 a | 92.5 b | 28.4 a | 3.27 b | 23.2 a | 36.6 | 107 a | 3.30 | 1.03 | 0.60 | |
| NFI | 3.51 b | 101 a | 15.9 b | 6.34 a | 20.3 b | 33.9 | 71.0 b | 2.85 | 1.09 | 0.47 | |
| Inoculant means | |||||||||||
| CON | 3.61 a | 87.8 b | 22.5 ab | 4.25 b | 23.8 | 40.0 a | 93.3 a | 3.43 | 0.80 | 0.82 | |
| LB | 3.54 c | 100 a | 23.5 a | 4.84 a | 22.0 | 32.6 b | 90.9 ab | 3.09 | 1.77 | 0.39 | |
| LT | 3.58 b | 96.9 ab | 21.1 b | 5.07 a | 20.4 | 35.1 ab | 89.1 ab | 2.92 | 0.83 | 0.77 | |
| BT | 3.56 c | 101 a | 21.5 ab | 5.07 a | 20.8 | 33.4 ab | 83.4 b | 2.87 | 0.83 | 0.17 | |
| SEM | 0.015 | 1.83 | 1.35 | 0.334 | 0.66 | 1.08 | 3.98 | 0.400 | 0.274 | 0.145 | |
| Effects and interactions | |||||||||||
| Fungal infestation | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.02 | 0.14 | <0.01 | 0.64 | 0.89 | 0.65 | |
| Inoculants | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.97 | 0.44 | 0.32 | |
| Fungal infestation × inoculants | <0.01 | 0.09 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.98 | 0.04 | 0.20 | |
a–f Means in columns within a category with unlike superscripts differ (p < 0.05).FI, fungal infestation; NFI, non-fungal infestation; CON, control; LB, L. buchneri applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; LT, L. plantarum applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; BT, L. buchneri and L. plantarum applied at 0.5 × 106 cfu/g FW. SEM, standard error of means. FW, fresh weight; DM, dry matter; WSC, water-soluble carbohydrates; TN, total nitrogen; LAB, lactic acid bacteria; AB, aerobic bacteria.
Effect of fungal infestation and inoculants on mycotoxin concentrations (μg/kg DM basis) of corn silage after 90 d of ensiling.
| Item | AFB1 | AFB2 | ZEN | DON | FB1 | FB2 | FB3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FI | Fresh | 35.1 a | 2.77 | 2015 a | 34.8 a | 999 a | 265 | 20.3 |
| CON | 21.3 b | 0.00 | 1598 b | 17.4 b | 376 bc | 259 | 60.0 | |
| LB | 11.2 c | 4.33 | 1518 b | 6.12 c | 173 bc | 91.7 | 47.7 | |
| LT | 13.4 bc | 2.90 | 1563 b | 6.70 c | 126 c | 152 | 68.3 | |
| BT | 7.13 cd | <0.50 | 1094 c | 4.51 c | 207 bc | 148 | 79.3 | |
| NFI | Fresh | <0.50 | <0.50 | 406 d | 21.5 b | 467 b | 129 | 48.7 |
| CON | <0.50 | <0.50 | 449 d | 3.05 c | 266 bc | 60.3 | 18.0 | |
| LB | <0.50 | <0.50 | 405 d | 5.48 c | 366 bc | 67.3 | 20.7 | |
| LT | <0.50 | <0.50 | 488 d | 3.17 c | 246 bc | 79.3 | 27.0 | |
| BT | <0.50 | <0.50 | 335 d | 4.73 c | 210 bc | 72.0 | 17.7 | |
| Infestation means (90 days) | ||||||||
| FI | 13.3 | 1.81 | 1443 a | 8.68 a | 221 b | 163 a | 63.8 a | |
| NFI | <0.50 | <0.50 | 419 b | 4.11 b | 272 a | 69.8 b | 20.8 b | |
| Inoculants means (90 days) | ||||||||
| CON | 10.7 a | 0.00 | 1023 a | 10.2 a | 321 a | 160 | 39.0 | |
| LB | 5.62 b | 2.17 | 962 a | 5.80 b | 270 ab | 79.5 | 34.2 | |
| LT | 6.72 ab | 1.45 | 1026 a | 4.93 b | 186 b | 116 | 47.7 | |
| BT | 3.57 b | 0.00 | 714 b | 4.62 b | 208 b | 110 | 48.5 | |
| SEM | 2.130 | 0.421 | 113.9 | 1.871 | 47.9 | 17.27 | 5.33 | |
| Effects and interactions | ||||||||
| Fungal infestation | <0.01 | 0.06 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
| Inoculants | <0.01 | 0.27 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.27 | 0.71 | |
| Fungal infestation × inoculants | <0.01 | 0.27 | 0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.18 | 0.70 | |
a–d Means in columns within a category with unlike superscripts differ (p < 0.05). FI, fungal infestation; NFI, non-fungal infestation; CON, control; LB, L. buchneri applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; LT, L. plantarum applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; BT, L. buchneri and L. plantarum applied at 0.5 × 106 cfu/g FW. SEM, standard error of means; FW, fresh weight; DM, dry matter.
The α-diversity indices of bacterial and fungal communities of corn silage.
| Treatment | Bacterial | Fungi Community | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon | Chao 1 | Shannon | Chao 1 | |
| FI Fresh | 3.80 | 427 | 2.33 b | 148 b |
| NFI Fresh | 3.22 | 490 | 3.00 a | 272 a |
| SEM | 0.165 | 19.2 | 0.157 | 29.0 |
| 0.07 | 0.10 | <0.01 | <0.01 | |
| Fungal infestation | ||||
| FI | 2.29 a | 258 | 2.55 a | 168 |
| NFI | 1.58 b | 280 | 1.50 b | 166 |
| Inoculants | ||||
| CON | 1.98 | 307 a | 2.08 | 177 |
| LB | 2.03 | 270 ab | 2.02 | 160 |
| LT | 1.90 | 229 b | 2.1 | 160 |
| BT | 1.82 | 271 ab | 1.89 | 172 |
| Days | ||||
| 5 | 1.52 b | 194 a | 2.68 a | 228 a |
| 90 | 2.35 a | 345 b | 1.36 b | 107 b |
| SEM | 0.095 | 14.7 | 0.154 | 10.5 |
| Fungal infestation | <0.01 | 0.15 | <0.01 | 0.83 |
| Inoculants | 0.35 | <0.01 | 0.32 | 0.50 |
| Days | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Fungal infestation × inoculants | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.57 |
| Fungal infestation × days | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
| Inoculants × days | 0.2063 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| Fungal infestation × inoculants × days | 0.6783 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.24 |
a,b Means in columns within a category with unlike superscripts differ (p < 0.05). FI, fungal infestation; NFI, non-fungal infestation; CON, control; LB, L. buchneri applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; LT, L. plantarum applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; BT, L. buchneri and L. plantarum applied at 0.5 × 106 cfu/g FW. SEM, standard error of means.
Figure 1Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot based on unweighted-UniFrac dissimilarity distance of the bacterial ((A), R = 0.6911, p = 0.001) and fungal ((B), R = 0.7088, p = 0.001) community between samples. FI, fungal infestation; NFI, non-fungal infestation.
Figure 2Bacterial community at the phylum (A) and genus (B) level for corn silage during ensiling. FI, fungal infestation; NFI, non-fungal infestation; CON, control; LB, L. buchneri applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; LT, L. plantarum applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; BT, L. buchneri and L. plantarum applied at 0.5 × 106 cfu/g FW.
Figure 3Fungal community at the phylum (A) and genus (B) level for corn silage during ensiling. FI, fungal infestation; NFI, non-fungal infestation; CON, control; LB, L. buchneri applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; LT, L. plantarum applied at 1 × 106 cfu/g FW; BT, L. buchneri and L. plantarum applied at 0.5 × 106 cfu/g FW.