Literature DB >> 34677633

Spinal pathology and outcome post-THA: does segment of arthrodesis matter?

Tom Schmidt-Braekling1,2, Matthew J Coyle1, Johanna Dobransky1, Cheryl Kreviazuk1, Wade Gofton1, Philippe Phan1, Paul E Beaulé1, George Grammatopoulos3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The presence of lumbar spine arthrodesis (SA) is associated with abnormal spinopelvic characteristics and inferior outcome post total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, whether patients with upper segment SA are also at increased risk of complications is unknown. This study aims to (1) determine if upper segment SA is associated with inferior THA outcomes; (2) assess spino-pelvic characteristics; and (3) test whether static or dynamic spinopelvic characteristics correlate with outcome post-THA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, case-matched, cohort study from a tertiary referral centre, 40 patients (59 hips) that had undergone both THA and any level of spinal arthrodesis (49 THA-Lumb and 10 THA-Cerv) were compared with 41 patients (59 hips) who had THA-only without known spinal pathology. Spino-pelvic characteristics [including severity of Degenerative-Disc-Disease (DDD); spinal balance and stiffness] and outcome, including patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), at minimum of 1-year post-THA were assessed.
RESULTS: THA-Lumb and THA-Cerv groups had greater number of complications and inferior hip and spinal PROMs compared to THA-Only (p < 0.001). Similar spinopelvic characteristics were seen between the THA-Cerv and THA-Lumb, which were significantly different to the THA-only group. The presence of DDD and unbalanced or stiff spine was associated with increased dislocation and inferior PROMs in the whole cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: THA in the presence of SA, regardless of level, is associated with inferior outcomes and an increased risk for dislocation. The presence of a SA is associated with increased risk of adverse spinopelvic characteristics. Such characteristics were strongly associated with increased dislocation-risk and inferior PROMs. It is likely that these adverse characteristics are the most important adverse predictor, rather than segment of SA per se.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degenerative spine; PROMs; Spinal arthrodesis; Spinopelvic dynamics; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34677633     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04220-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   2.928


  22 in total

1.  Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008.

Authors:  Sean S Rajaee; Hyun W Bae; Linda E A Kanim; Rick B Delamarter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Does Timing of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Prior to or After Lumbar Spine Fusion Have an Effect on Dislocation and Revision Rates?

Authors:  Arthur L Malkani; Kevin J Himschoot; Kevin L Ong; Edmund C Lau; Doruk Baykal; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Time to Dislocation Analysis of Lumbar Spine Fusion Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: Breaking Up a Happy Home.

Authors:  Connor A King; David C Landy; John M Martell; Hue H Luu; Lewis L Shi; Michael J Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Abnormally High Dislocation Rates of Total Hip Arthroplasty After Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bedard; Christopher T Martin; Sean E Slaven; Andrew J Pugely; Sergio A Mendoza-Lattes; John J Callaghan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Survey of current physiotherapy practice for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A Rushton; C Wright; A Heap; L White; G Eveleigh; N Heneghan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  The Impact of Spino-Pelvic Alignment on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Critical Analysis of Current Evidence.

Authors:  Assem A Sultan; Anton Khlopas; Nicolas S Piuzzi; Morad Chughtai; Nipun Sodhi; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Prosthetic Dislocation and Revision After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Lumbar Fusion Patients: A Propensity Score Matched-Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Dean C Perfetti; Ran Schwarzkopf; Aaron J Buckland; Carl B Paulino; Jonathan M Vigdorchik
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Early Outcomes of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty After Prior Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Barry; David C Sing; Thomas P Vail; Erik N Hansen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Complications in Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion After THA.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; George A Beyer; Preston W Grieco; Shian Liu; Louis M Day; Roby Abraham; Qais Naziri; Peter G Passias; Aditya V Maheshwari; Carl B Paulino
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Prevalence of symptomatic hip, knee, and spine osteoarthritis nationwide health survey analysis of an elderly Korean population.

Authors:  Jung-Ho Park; Jae-Young Hong; Kyungdo Han; Seung-Woo Suh; Si-Young Park; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Seung-Woo Han
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of lumbar spinal fusion on native acetabular anteinclination in standing position.

Authors:  Dimitris Dimitriou; Samuel Haupt; Sabrina Weber; Elin Winkler; Michael Betz; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.