Literature DB >> 25188595

Survey of current physiotherapy practice for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion in the United Kingdom.

A Rushton1, C Wright, A Heap, L White, G Eveleigh, N Heneghan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive survey methodology employed a SurveyMonkey online questionnaire.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate UK National Health Service physiotherapy practice for lumbar spinal fusion surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: An increasing rate of surgery and high level of patient dis-satisfaction focus attention to rehabilitation of patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. Inconclusive, very low-quality evidence for the effectiveness of physiotherapy management after lumbar spinal fusion exists. Best practice, therefore, remains unclear. Limited comparability of outcomes and retrieval of only 2 trials reflected a lack of research and considerable heterogeneity. An evaluation of current practice is required, to inform a future trial to evaluate a best practice physiotherapy intervention.
METHODS: Eligible participants were all physiotherapists working with patients undergoing spinal fusion. A previous survey and recent systematic review informed questions. Statistical analyses included responder characteristics and preplanned descriptive analyses. Thematic analysis was conducted on open-ended question data.
RESULTS: The 83.5% response rate was good. Findings illustrated varied provision relating to assessment and management of patients pre- and postoperatively. Physiotherapists employed limited use of protocols or guidelines, partly attributed to the poor evidence base for this surgery. Scope of practice included exercise, advice, listing for surgery, and ordering investigations. Patient education played an important role. Patient-centered practice was important, although constraints owing to limited resources (staffing, poor evidence, base/lack of protocols) were evident.
CONCLUSION: Current UK pre- and postoperative physiotherapy practice for lumbar spinal fusion is described. It is not clear whether patients who are seen by physiotherapists have improved outcomes, owing to variability of practice, physiotherapy being delivered in a range of locations at a range of times postoperatively, and limited use of outcome measures. The findings support the need for a randomized clinical trial evaluating effectiveness of a best practice physiotherapy management intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25188595     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  Determining clinical practice of expert physiotherapy for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: a cross-sectional survey study.

Authors:  Esther R C Janssen; Elle E M Scheijen; Nico L U van Meeteren; Rob A de Bie; Anton F Lenssen; Paul C Willems; Thomas J Hoogeboom
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Rehabilitation following lumbar fusion surgery (REFS) a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  James Greenwood; Alison McGregor; Fiona Jones; Michael Hurley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Structured rehabilitation after lumbar spine surgery : subacute treatment phase].

Authors:  J Schröter; M Lechterbeck; F Hartmann; E Gercek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Immediate patient perceptions following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: semi-structured multi-centre interviews exploring the patient journey and experiences of lumbar fusion surgery (FuJourn).

Authors:  Alison Rushton; Bini Elena; Feroz Jadhakhan; Annabel Masson; J Bart Staal; Martin L Verra; Andrew Emms; Michael Reddington; Ashley Cole; Paul C Willems; Lorin Benneker; Nicola R Heneghan; Andrew Soundy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Spinal pathology and outcome post-THA: does segment of arthrodesis matter?

Authors:  Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Matthew J Coyle; Johanna Dobransky; Cheryl Kreviazuk; Wade Gofton; Philippe Phan; Paul E Beaulé; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.928

6.  Use of the PREPARE (PREhabilitation, Physical Activity and exeRcisE) program to improve outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery for severe low back pain: a study protocol of a person-centred randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hanna Lotzke; Max Jakobsson; Helena Brisby; Annelie Gutke; Olle Hägg; Rob Smeets; Marlies den Hollander; Lars-Eric Olsson; Mari Lundberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Does walking after lumbar spinal surgery predict recovery of function at six months? Protocol for a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sarah Gilmore; Jodie A McClelland; Megan Davidson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Development and validation of two clinical prediction models to inform clinical decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery for degenerative disorders and rehabilitation following surgery: protocol for a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Alison B Rushton; Martin L Verra; Andrew Emms; Nicola R Heneghan; Deborah Falla; Michael Reddington; Ashley A Cole; Paul Willems; Lorin Benneker; David Selvey; Michael Hutton; Martijn W Heymans; J Bart Staal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Patient journey following lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSFS): protocol for a multicentre qualitative analysis of the patient rehabilitation experience (FuJourn).

Authors:  Alison Rushton; J Bart Staal; Martin Verra; Andrew Emms; Michael Reddington; Andrew Soundy; Ashley Cole; Paul Willems; Lorin Benneker; Annabel Masson; Nicola R Heneghan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  What interventions are used to improve exercise adherence in older people and what behavioural techniques are they based on? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan Room; Erin Hannink; Helen Dawes; Karen Barker
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.