Literature DB >> 29389793

Complications in Patients Undergoing Spinal Fusion After THA.

Bassel G Diebo1, George A Beyer1, Preston W Grieco1, Shian Liu2, Louis M Day1, Roby Abraham1, Qais Naziri1, Peter G Passias3, Aditya V Maheshwari1, Carl B Paulino1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with lumbar spine and hip disorders may, during the course of their treatment, undergo spinal fusion and THA. There is disagreement among prior studies regarding whether patients who undergo THA and spinal fusion are at increased risk of THA dislocation and other hip-related complications. QUESTIONS / PURPOSES: Is short or long spinal fusion associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications in patients who underwent a prior THA? PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of New York State's Department of Health database (SPARCS) was performed. SPARCS has a unique identification code for each patient, allowing investigators to track the patient across multiple admissions. The SPARCS dataset spans visit data of patients of all ages and races across urban and rural locations. The SPARCs dataset encompasses all facilities covered under New York State Article 28 and uses measures to further representative reporting of data concerning all races. Owing to the nature of the SPARCS dataset, we are unable to comment on data leakage, as there is no way to discern between a patient who does not subsequently seek care and a patient who seeks care outside New York State. ICD-9-Clinical Modification codes identified adult patients who underwent elective THA from 2009 to 2011. Patients who had subsequent spinal fusion (short: 2-3 levels, or long: ≥ 4 levels) with a diagnosis of adult idiopathic scoliosis or degenerative disc disease were identified. Forty-nine thousand nine hundred twenty patients met the inclusion criteria of the study. In our inclusion and exclusion criteria, there was no variation with respect to the distribution of sex and race across the three groups of interest. Patients who underwent a spinal procedure (short versus long fusion) had comparable age. However, patients who did not undergo a spinal procedure were older than patients who had short fusion (65 ± 12.4 years versus 63 ± 10.7 years; p < 0.001). Multivariate binary logistic regression models that controlled for age, sex, and Deyo/Charlson scores were used to investigate the association between spinal fusion and THA revisions, postoperative dislocation, contralateral THAs, and total surgical complications to the end of 2013. A total of 49,920 patients who had THAs were included in one of three groups (no subsequent spinal fusion: n = 49,209; short fusion: n = 478; long fusion: n = 233).
RESULTS: Regression models revealed that short and long spinal fusions were associated with increased odds for hip dislocation, with associated odds ratios (ORs) of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.4-3.6; p = 0.002), and 4.4 (95% CI, 2.7-7.3; p < 0.001), respectively. Patients who underwent THA and spinal surgery also had an increased odds for THA revision, with ORs of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-2.8; p < 0.001) and 3.2 (95% CI, 2.1-4.8; p < 0.001) for short and long fusion, respectively. However, spinal fusions were not associated with contralateral THAs. Further, short and long spinal fusions were associated with increased surgical complication rates (OR = 2.8, 95% CI, 2.1-3.8, p < 0.001; OR = 5.3, 95% CI, 3.8-7.4, p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: We showed that spinal fusion in adults is associated with an increased frequency of complications and revisions in patients who have had a prior THA. Specifically, patients who had a long spinal fusion after THA had 340% higher odds of experiencing a hip dislocation and 220% higher odds of having to undergo a revision THA. Further research is necessary to determine whether this relationship is associated with the surgical order, or whether more patient-specific surgical goals of revision THA should be developed for patients with a spinal deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29389793      PMCID: PMC6259718          DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

1.  Lifetime Risk of Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery for Osteoarthritis From 2003 to 2013: A Multinational Analysis Using National Registry Data.

Authors:  Ilana N Ackerman; Megan A Bohensky; Richard de Steiger; Caroline A Brand; Antti Eskelinen; Anne Marie Fenstad; Ove Furnes; Stephen E Graves; Jaason Haapakoski; Keijo Mäkelä; Frank Mehnert; Szilard Nemes; Søren Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Göran Garellick
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates.

Authors:  S A Yoder; R A Brand; D R Pedersen; T W O'Gorman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Spinopelvic alignment in patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip: a radiographic comparison to patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Hisashi Yoshimoto; Shigenobu Sato; Takeshi Masuda; Taiki Kanno; Motoyuki Shundo; Takahiko Hyakumachi; Yasushi Yanagibashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  The Impact of Lumbar Spine Disease and Deformity on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel J Blizzard; Brian T Nickel; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael P Bolognesi
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Prior Lumbar Spinal Arthrodesis Increases Risk of Prosthetic-Related Complication in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David C Sing; Jeffrey J Barry; Thomas U Aguilar; Alexander A Theologis; Joseph T Patterson; Bobby K Tay; Thomas P Vail; Erik N Hansen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II.

Authors:  Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-01

7.  Hip-spine syndrome.

Authors:  C M Offierski; I MacNab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Nicola Hawkinson; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Acetabular Anteversion Changes Due to Spinal Deformity Correction: Bridging the Gap Between Hip and Spine Surgeons.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Jonathan Vigdorchik; Frank J Schwab; Thomas J Errico; Renaud Lafage; Christopher Ames; Shay Bess; Justin Smith; Gregory M Mundis; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The effect of total hip arthroplasty on sagittal spinal-pelvic-leg alignment and low back pain in patients with severe hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Wenjie Weng; Hao Wu; Mingda Wu; Yawen Zhu; Yong Qiu; Weijun Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  6 in total

1.  Does fusion length matter? Total hip arthroplasty dislocation after extension of lumbosacral fusion: a case report.

Authors:  Daniel Alsoof; Christopher L McDonald; Matthew Kovoor; Bassel G Diebo; Eren O Kuris; Valentin Antoci; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-08-03

2.  Spinal pathology and outcome post-THA: does segment of arthrodesis matter?

Authors:  Tom Schmidt-Braekling; Matthew J Coyle; Johanna Dobransky; Cheryl Kreviazuk; Wade Gofton; Philippe Phan; Paul E Beaulé; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Lumbar spinal fusion does not increase early dislocation risk in primary total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Dimitris Dimitriou; Christoph Zindel; Sabrina Weber; Dominik Kaiser; Michael Betz; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 4.  Current concepts in hip-spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luigi Zagra; Francesco Benazzo; Dante Dallari; Francesco Falez; Giuseppe Solarino; Rocco D'Apolito; Claudio Carlo Castelli
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-01-11

5.  Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients Have Lower Risk of Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared with Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Haitao Guan; Chi Xu; Jun Fu; Xue Yang; Yingze Zhang; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-08-11

6.  Spinopelvic Relationship and Its Impact on Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stefan Louette; Alice Wignall; Hemant Pandit
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-08-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.