| Literature DB >> 34677469 |
Diana Pacheco1, João Cotas1, Andreia Domingues2, Sandrine Ressurreição2,3, Kiril Bahcevandziev2,3, Leonel Pereira1.
Abstract
Presently, there is a high demand for nutritionally enhanced foods, so it is a current challenge to look at new raw food sources that can supplement beneficially the human diet. The nutritional profile and key secondary metabolites of red seaweeds (Rhodophyta) are gaining interest because of this challenge. In this context, the possible use of the red seaweed Chondracanthus teedei var. lusitanicus (Gigartinales) as a novel nutraceutical source was investigated. As a result, we highlight the high mineral content of this seaweed, representing 29.35 g 100 g-1 of its dry weight (DW). Despite the low levels of calcium and phosphorus (0.26 and 0.20 g 100 g-1 DW, respectively), this seaweed is an interesting source of nitrogen and potassium (2.13 and 2.29 g-1 DW, accordingly). Furthermore, the high content of carbohydrates (56.03 g 100 g-1 DW), which acts as dietary fibers, confers a low caloric content of this raw food source. Thus, this study demonstrates that C. teedei var. lusitanicus is in fact an unexploited potential resource with the capability to provide key minerals to the human diet with promising nutraceutical properties.Entities:
Keywords: bioactive compounds; nutraceutical; nutritional characterization; red seaweed
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34677469 PMCID: PMC8539408 DOI: 10.3390/md19100570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Chondrachantus teedei var. lusitanicus (fructified female gametophyte) in Buarcos Bay (Figueira da Foz, Portugal).
Macro- and micro-elements characterization of the dried biomass of C. teedei var. lusitanicus. Results are expressed in mean ± standard deviation. Nutritional value in 7 g of C. teedei var. lusitanicus according to the established Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) [1,27]. NA—Non applicable.
| Macro- and Micro-Elements | g 100 g−1 | 7 g of | DRI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen | 2.13 ±0.01 | NA | NA |
| Phosphorus | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 1.4 × 10−2 | 2 |
| Calcium | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 1.82 × 10−2 | 2.27 |
| Magnesium | 0.86 ± 0.02 | 6.02 × 10−2 | 16.05 |
| Potassium | 2.29 ± 0.07 | 1.60 × 10−1 | 8.02 |
| Iron | 0.02 ± 0.03 | 1.28 × 10−3 | 9.15 |
| Copper | 3.0 × 10−4 ± 3.0 × 10−5 | 2.33 × 10−5 | 2.33 |
| Zinc | 2.4 × 10−3 ± 1.0 × 10−4 | 1.68 × 10−4 | 1.68 |
| Manganese | 1.2 × 10−3 ± 1.0 × 10−5 | 8.40 × 10−5 | 4.20 |
Nutritional characterization of the fresh (FW) and dried (DW) C. teedei var. lusitanicus biomass weight. Results are expressed in mean ± standard deviation. Nutritional value in 7 g of C. teedei var. lusitanicus according to the established Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) [1,27]. NA—Non applicable.
| 7 g of | DRI (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Moisture | 86.52 ± 0.18 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Ash | 3.96 ± 0.07 | 29.35 ± 0.13 | 1:7.4 | 2.1 | NA |
| Total lipid | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 1.42 ± 0.01 | 1:7.4 | 0.10 | 0.14 |
| Fiber | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 1.78 ± 0.09 | 1:7.4 | 0.13 | 0.49 |
| Protein | 1.54 ± 0.01 | 11.42 ± 0.01 | 1:7.4 | 0.80 | 1.59 |
| Total carbohydrate | 7.55 ± 0.12 | 56.03 ± 0.05 | 1:7.4 | 3.98 | 1.50 |
| Energy (Kcal 100 g−1) | 38 ± 0.47 | 283 ± 0.23 | 1:7.4 | 19.81 * | 0.99 |
* Measured in total Kcal.
Polysaccharide quantification and nutritional value in 7 g of C. teedei var. lusitanicus according to the established Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) [1,27].
| DW (%) | 7 g of | DRI (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female gametophyte | 40.9 ± 1.5 | 2.86 | 11.45 |
| Male gametophyte | 42.1 ± 4.5 | 2.95 | 11.79 |
| Tetrasporophyte | 28.1 ± 8.1 | 1.97 | 7.87 |
Figure 2FTIR-ATR spectra of the carrageenophytes: A: Chondracanthus teedei var. lusitanicus tetrasporophyte, B: C. teedei var. lusitanicus male and C: C. teedei var. lusitanicus female gametophytes.
FTIR-ATR bands identification and characterization of the C. teedei var lusitanicus (CTGF-female gametophyte, CTGM- male gametophyte, CTT- tetrasporophyte), based on the literature [30,31].
| Wave Number (cm−1) | Bound | Compound | CTGF | CTGM | CTT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| C–O–SO3 on C2 of 3,6-anhydrogalactose | DA2S | + | + | - |
|
| C–O–SO3 on C2 of galactose | G/D2S | - | - | + |
|
| D-galactose-4-sulfate | G4S | + | + | - |
|
| C–O–SO3 on C6 of galactose | G/D6S | + | + | - |
|
| Unsulfated b- | G/D | + | sh | sh |
|
| C–O–SO3 on C2 of 3,6-anhydrogalactose | DA2S | sh | sh | sh |
|
| C–O of 3,6-anhydrogalactose (agar/carrageenan) | (DA) | + | + | sh |
|
| Galactose | G/D | + | + | - |
|
| Sulfated esters | S=O | + | + | + |
|
| C–O of 3,6-anhydrogalactose | DA | + | + | sh |
|
| Sulfated esters | S=O | + | + | + |
|
| Sulfated esters | S=O | + | + | + |
Sh—shoulder (where the peak shows intensity but not enough to be designated a peak because of the surrounding peak intensities).
Figure 31H-NMR spectra of carrageenans extracted from Chondracanthus teedei var. lusitanicus: A (tetrasporophyte). B (female gametophyte), C (male gametophyte).
Figure 413C-NMR spectra of carrageenans extracted from Chondracanthus teedei var. lusitanicus: T (tetrasporophyte). B (male gametophyte), C (female gametophyte—alkaline extraction).