Literature DB >> 33426018

Key Considerations for the Use of Seaweed to Reduce Enteric Methane Emissions From Cattle.

Sandra Vijn1, Devan Paulus Compart2, Nikki Dutta3, Athanasios Foukis4, Matthias Hess5, Alexander N Hristov6, Kenneth F Kalscheur7, Ermias Kebreab5, Sergey V Nuzhdin8, Nichole N Price4, Yan Sun9, Juan M Tricarico10, Adele Turzillo1, Martin R Weisbjerg11, Charles Yarish12, Timothy D Kurt3.   

Abstract

Enteric methane emissions are the single largest source of direct greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in beef and dairy value chains and a substantial contributor to anthropogenic methane emissions globally. In late 2019, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) and the Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (FFAR) convened approximately 50 stakeholders representing research and production of seaweeds, animal feeds, dairy cattle, and beef and dairy foods to discuss challenges and opportunities associated with the use of seaweed-based ingredients to reduce enteric methane emissions. This Perspective article describes the considerations identified by the workshop participants and suggests next steps for the further development and evaluation of seaweed-based feed ingredients as enteric methane mitigants. Although numerous compounds derived from sources other than seaweed have been identified as having enteric methane mitigation potential, these mitigants are outside the scope of this article.
Copyright © 2020 Vijn, Compart, Dutta, Foukis, Hess, Hristov, Kalscheur, Kebreab, Nuzhdin, Price, Sun, Tricarico, Turzillo, Weisbjerg, Yarish and Kurt.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agriculture; beef; cattle; dairy; livestock; methane; ruminant; seaweed

Year:  2020        PMID: 33426018      PMCID: PMC7785520          DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.597430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Vet Sci        ISSN: 2297-1769


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Retrospective Review of Global Commercial Seaweed Production-Current Challenges, Biosecurity and Mitigation Measures and Prospects.

Authors:  Rajeena Sugumaran; Birdie Scott Padam; Wilson Thau Lym Yong; Suryani Saallah; Kamruddin Ahmed; Nur Athirah Yusof
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 2.  Towards a Better Understanding of the Potential Benefits of Seaweed Based Biostimulants in Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars.

Authors:  Liam Jay Samuels; Mathabatha Evodia Setati; Erna Hailey Blancquaert
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27

3.  Chondracanthus teedei var. lusitanicus: The Nutraceutical Potential of an Unexploited Marine Resource.

Authors:  Diana Pacheco; João Cotas; Andreia Domingues; Sandrine Ressurreição; Kiril Bahcevandziev; Leonel Pereira
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 5.118

4.  Simulation of sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima) breeding guided by practices to accelerate genetic gains.

Authors:  Mao Huang; Kelly R Robbins; Yaoguang Li; Schery Umanzor; Michael Marty-Rivera; David Bailey; Charles Yarish; Scott Lindell; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.542

Review 5.  Hydrogen and formate production and utilisation in the rumen and the human colon.

Authors:  William J Kelly; Roderick I Mackie; Graeme T Attwood; Peter H Janssen; Tim A McAllister; Sinead C Leahy
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-03-14

6.  How necessary and feasible are reductions of methane emissions from livestock to support stringent temperature goals?

Authors:  Andy Reisinger; Harry Clark; Annette L Cowie; Jeremy Emmet-Booth; Carlos Gonzalez Fischer; Mario Herrero; Mark Howden; Sinead Leahy
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.226

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.