Mindy K Ross1, Sarah Friedman1, Ilana Radparvar2, Gery Ryan3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. Department of Undergraduate Education, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Collection of patient-reported data has been demonstrated to improve asthma outcomes. One method to collect information is through the electronic patient portal. In practice, patient portal use in pediatrics and, specifically for asthma management, has had low uptake. OBJECTIVE: To understand parental/caregiver experience of pediatric asthma care management, and perceptions of the use of patient portal questionnaires before the clinic visit. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with caregivers of children 5-11 years old with asthma in the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System. We included patient portal "users" (n = 20) and "non-users" (n = 5). Interview questions were developed based on clinic visit workflow with a focus on perceived usefulness and ease of use to complete pediatric asthma questionnaires in the patient portal before the visit. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and codes were generated from themes using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: We identified eight themes related to caregiver-physician communication, perception of portal questionnaires, facilitators, and barriers to portal questionnaire use. A salient finding was that caregivers considered the portal questionnaire as a tool to be integrated into the visit to facilitate a conversation about their child's asthma. Caregiver portal-based questionnaire use was more likely if the ongoing data entered was accessible to caregivers to track and update, and if caregivers were reassured the clinicians would use questionnaire responses during the visit. CONCLUSION: Caregivers of children with asthma are more likely to complete a patient portal intake questionnaire before the visit if they trust their responses will be used during the visit to inform care.
BACKGROUND: Collection of patient-reported data has been demonstrated to improve asthma outcomes. One method to collect information is through the electronic patient portal. In practice, patient portal use in pediatrics and, specifically for asthma management, has had low uptake. OBJECTIVE: To understand parental/caregiver experience of pediatric asthma care management, and perceptions of the use of patient portal questionnaires before the clinic visit. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with caregivers of children 5-11 years old with asthma in the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health System. We included patient portal "users" (n = 20) and "non-users" (n = 5). Interview questions were developed based on clinic visit workflow with a focus on perceived usefulness and ease of use to complete pediatric asthma questionnaires in the patient portal before the visit. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and codes were generated from themes using constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: We identified eight themes related to caregiver-physician communication, perception of portal questionnaires, facilitators, and barriers to portal questionnaire use. A salient finding was that caregivers considered the portal questionnaire as a tool to be integrated into the visit to facilitate a conversation about their child's asthma. Caregiver portal-based questionnaire use was more likely if the ongoing data entered was accessible to caregivers to track and update, and if caregivers were reassured the clinicians would use questionnaire responses during the visit. CONCLUSION: Caregivers of children with asthma are more likely to complete a patient portal intake questionnaire before the visit if they trust their responses will be used during the visit to inform care.
Authors: Alexander G Fiks; Stephanie L Mayne; Dean J Karavite; Andrew Suh; Ryan O'Hara; A Russell Localio; Michelle Ross; Robert W Grundmeier Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Michelle M Cloutier; Alan P Baptist; Kathryn V Blake; Edward G Brooks; Tyra Bryant-Stephens; Emily DiMango; Anne E Dixon; Kurtis S Elward; Tina Hartert; Jerry A Krishnan; Robert F Lemanske; Daniel R Ouellette; Wilson D Pace; Michael Schatz; Neil S Skolnik; James W Stout; Stephen J Teach; Craig A Umscheid; Colin G Walsh Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Alexander G Fiks; Nathalie DuRivage; Stephanie L Mayne; Stacia Finch; Michelle E Ross; Kelli Giacomini; Andrew Suh; Banita McCarn; Elias Brandt; Dean Karavite; Elizabeth W Staton; Laura P Shone; Valerie McGoldrick; Kathleen Noonan; Dorothy Miller; Christoph U Lehmann; Wilson D Pace; Robert W Grundmeier Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Allison Worth; Victoria Hammersley; Rebecca Knibb; Bertine Flokstra-de-Blok; Audrey DunnGalvin; Samantha Walker; Anthony E J Dubois; Aziz Sheikh Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Joanne Greenhalgh; Kate Gooding; Elizabeth Gibbons; Sonia Dalkin; Judy Wright; Jose Valderas; Nick Black Journal: J Patient Rep Outcomes Date: 2018-09-15