Literature DB >> 32048085

The development of PROmunication: a training-tool for clinicians using patient-reported outcomes to promote patient-centred communication in clinical cancer settings.

Pernille C Skovlund1,2, Sissel Ravn3,4, Lene Seibaek3,5, Henriette Vind Thaysen3,4, Kirsten Lomborg3,6, Berit Kjærside Nielsen3,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of using real-time patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in cancer communication has gained attention both in the clinic and in research. Despite this, no internationally accepted guidelines or training programs for clinicians on how to engage in patient-centred communication based on PROs exist. Lack of training may complicate implementation and systematic use of PROs in the clinic. We aimed to develop a short and feasible manual and training session in PRO-based dialogue rooted in patient-centred communication, coined PROmunication.
METHODS: PROmunication was implemented in two studies using PROs in different clinical cancer settings. We interviewed clinicians twice during the development phase. First, adopting a clinical perspective, they provided ideas for content, length and structure of the training session and the manual. Second, they approved the draft of the manual with minor adjustments on how to document clinician-patient communication. The final version of the PROmunication tool was built on clinicians' input, theory on patient-centred communication, a literature review, and didactic considerations.
RESULTS: The one-page manual gave clinicians a brief and clear overview of how to prepare for, undergo and document a PRO-based consultation. Illustrations and verbal phrases were offered to operationalize and facilitate patient-centred communication. The training session included elements like evidence-based knowledge about the rationale, benefits and challenges of using PROs and comprised theory, experimental training and instructions for the use of the manual in clinical practice. Ad hoc training and feedback in the clinic followed the training session.
CONCLUSIONS: This paper presents the development of a short, theory-driven manual and training session intended to support and engage clinicians in PRO-based dialogue leading to patient-centred communication. Further testing of the tool is necessary and adjustments may be required if the PROmunication tool should be applied in other clinical settings were patients are seen regularly. An evaluation of the tool is planned to be performed in future studies. Training in PROmunication may further systematic and consistent use of PRO data in the consultation, leading to patient-centred consultations and increased patient involvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Manual; Patient-centred communication; Patient-reported outcomes; Training

Year:  2020        PMID: 32048085     DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-0174-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes        ISSN: 2509-8020


  7 in total

1.  Partnered decision support: Parental perspectives of completing a pre-visit pediatric asthma questionnaire via the patient portal.

Authors:  Mindy K Ross; Sarah Friedman; Ilana Radparvar; Gery Ryan
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2021-10-26

2.  An implementation study of electronic assessment of patient-reported outcomes in inpatient radiation oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Nordhausen; Katharina Lampe; Dirk Vordermark; Bernhard Holzner; Haifa-Kathrin Al-Ali; Gabriele Meyer; Heike Schmidt
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-19

3.  Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective.

Authors:  Amalie Søgaard Nielsen; Charlotte W Appel; Birgit Furstrand Larsen; Lisa Hanna; Lars Kayser
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  Outcomes of a Mobile App to Monitor Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Yvonne C Lee; Fengxin Lu; Joshua Colls; Dee Luo; Penny Wang; Dorothy D Dunlop; Lutfiyya N Muhammad; Jing Song; Kaleb Michaud; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 15.483

5.  Feasibility of implementing a text-based symptom-monitoring program of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer patients during treatment.

Authors:  Michelle J Naughton; Ritu Salani; Juan Peng; Maryam Lustberg; Cecilia DeGraffinreid; Jennifer Moon; Hibaq Loyan; Chloe M Beverly Hery; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Knowledge translation resources to support the use of quality of life assessment tools for the care of older adults living at home and their family caregivers.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Richard Sawatzky; Lena Cuthbertson; Joakim Öhlén; Autumn Beemer; Dominique Duquette; Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi; Kelli I Stajduhar; Nitya Suryaprakash; Landa Terblanche; Angela C Wolff; S Robin Cohen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.440

7.  Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings.

Authors:  Angela M Stover; Lotte Haverman; Hedy A van Oers; Joanne Greenhalgh; Caroline M Potter
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.