Emma S Winkler1,2, Rita E Chen1,2, Fahmida Alam3,4, Soner Yildiz3,4, James Brett Case1, Melissa B Uccellini3,4, Michael J Holtzman1,5, Adolfo Garcia-Sastre3,4,6,7,8, Michael Schotsaert3,4, Michael S Diamond1,2,9,10. 1. Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 2. Department of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 3. Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 4. Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 5. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 7. The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 8. Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinaigrid.59734.3c, New York, New York, USA. 9. Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 10. The Andrew M. and Jane M. Bursky Center for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Abstract
The development of mouse models for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has enabled testing of vaccines and therapeutics and defining aspects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pathogenesis. SARS-CoV-2 disease is severe in K18 transgenic mice (K18-hACE2 Tg) expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, under an ectopic cytokeratin promoter, with high levels of infection measured in the lung and brain. Here, we evaluated SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 knock-in (KI) mice that express hACE2 under an endogenous promoter in place of murine ACE2 (mACE2). Intranasal inoculation of hACE2 KI mice with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 resulted in substantial viral replication within the upper and lower respiratory tracts with limited spread to extrapulmonary organs. However, SARS-CoV-2-infected hACE2 KI mice did not lose weight and developed limited pathology. Moreover, no significant differences in viral burden were observed in hACE2 KI mice infected with B.1.1.7 or B.1.351 variants compared to the WA1/2020 strain. Because the entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 in mice remain uncertain, we evaluated the impact of the naturally occurring, mouse-adapting N501Y mutation by comparing infection of hACE2 KI, K18-hACE2 Tg, ACE2-deficient, and wild-type C57BL/6 mice. The N501Y mutation minimally affected SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 KI mice but was required for viral replication in wild-type C57BL/6 mice in a mACE2-dependent manner and augmented pathogenesis in the K18-hACE2 Tg mice. Thus, the N501Y mutation likely enhances interactions with mACE2 or hACE2 in vivo. Overall, our study highlights the hACE2 KI mice as a model of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease and clarifies the requirement of the N501Y mutation in mice. IMPORTANCE Mouse models of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis have facilitated the rapid evaluation of countermeasures. While the first generation of models developed pneumonia and severe disease after SARS-CoV-2 infection, they relied on ectopic expression of supraphysiological levels of human ACE2 (hACE2). This has raised issues with their relevance to humans, as the hACE2 receptor shows a more restricted expression pattern in the respiratory tract. Here, we evaluated SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease with viruses containing or lacking a key mouse-adapting mutation in the spike gene in hACE2 KI mice, which express hACE2 under an endogenous promoter in place of murine ACE2. While infection of hACE2 KI mice with multiple strains of SARS-CoV-2 including variants of concern resulted in viral replication within the upper and lower respiratory tracts, the animals did not sustain severe lung injury. Thus, hACE2 KI mice serve as a model of mild infection with both ancestral and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant strains.
The development of mouse models for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has enabled testing of vaccines and therapeutics and defining aspects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pathogenesis. SARS-CoV-2 disease is severe in K18 transgenic mice (K18-hACE2 Tg) expressing human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, under an ectopic cytokeratin promoter, with high levels of infection measured in the lung and brain. Here, we evaluated SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 knock-in (KI) mice that express hACE2 under an endogenous promoter in place of murine ACE2 (mACE2). Intranasal inoculation of hACE2 KI mice with SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 resulted in substantial viral replication within the upper and lower respiratory tracts with limited spread to extrapulmonary organs. However, SARS-CoV-2-infected hACE2 KI mice did not lose weight and developed limited pathology. Moreover, no significant differences in viral burden were observed in hACE2 KI mice infected with B.1.1.7 or B.1.351 variants compared to the WA1/2020 strain. Because the entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 in mice remain uncertain, we evaluated the impact of the naturally occurring, mouse-adapting N501Y mutation by comparing infection of hACE2 KI, K18-hACE2 Tg, ACE2-deficient, and wild-type C57BL/6 mice. The N501Y mutation minimally affected SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 KI mice but was required for viral replication in wild-type C57BL/6 mice in a mACE2-dependent manner and augmented pathogenesis in the K18-hACE2 Tg mice. Thus, the N501Y mutation likely enhances interactions with mACE2 or hACE2 in vivo. Overall, our study highlights the hACE2 KI mice as a model of mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease and clarifies the requirement of the N501Y mutation in mice. IMPORTANCE Mouse models of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis have facilitated the rapid evaluation of countermeasures. While the first generation of models developed pneumonia and severe disease after SARS-CoV-2 infection, they relied on ectopic expression of supraphysiological levels of human ACE2 (hACE2). This has raised issues with their relevance to humans, as the hACE2 receptor shows a more restricted expression pattern in the respiratory tract. Here, we evaluated SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease with viruses containing or lacking a key mouse-adapting mutation in the spike gene in hACE2 KI mice, which express hACE2 under an endogenous promoter in place of murine ACE2. While infection of hACE2 KI mice with multiple strains of SARS-CoV-2 including variants of concern resulted in viral replication within the upper and lower respiratory tracts, the animals did not sustain severe lung injury. Thus, hACE2 KI mice serve as a model of mild infection with both ancestral and emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant strains.
Since the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 2019, multiple models of infection and pathogenesis have been developed in mice. Because human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), but not murine ACE2 (mACE2), can engage and bind the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, several strategies were established for expressing hACE2 in mice. One of these models, the K18-hACE2 transgenic mouse (K18-hACE2 Tg), in which hACE2 is expressed under an ectopic cytokeratin K18 promoter, is commonly used and provides a stringent model of severe infection allowing rapid evaluation of vaccines and monoclonal antibody-based therapies in vivo (1–4). However, expression of the hACE2 transgene in these mice is nonphysiological with both a high number of hACE2 transgene insertions as well as ectopic expression on cells that do not normally express ACE2. This is best exemplified by SARS-CoV-2 infection in the brains of K18-hACE2 Tg mice, which does not reflect the central nervous system (CNS) involvement seen in humans or other animals such as hamsters or nonhuman primates (5–8). Because expression of hACE2 in K18-hACE2 Tg mice is independent of the transcriptional regulation that normally governs ACE2 levels, some aspects of infection or transmission likely are not modeled in a physiologically relevant manner. Therefore, development of additional mouse models is necessary to understand aspects of viral pathogenesis and tropism.In this study, we evaluated SARS-CoV-2 infection of mice that express hACE2 under an endogenous promoter in place of mACE2 (hACE2 knock-in [KI] mice). Human ACE2 was expressed in the nasal turbinate, lung, duodenum, and kidney. After intranasal inoculation of hACE2 KI mice, high levels of viral RNA were detected in nasal turbinates and lungs with limited spread to extrapulmonary organs, including the brain and gastrointestinal tract. Despite productive infection of the respiratory tract, weight loss was not observed, and lung inflammation was limited. Furthermore, we established the impact of the N501Y mutation, a substitution naturally present in both mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 strains and variants of concern, in multiple murine models.
RESULTS
Human ACE2 expression in hACE2 KI and K18-hACE2 transgenic mice.
As previously described, hACE2 KI mice were generated (9) with hACE2 cDNA inserted in-frame and immediately downstream of the endogenous initiation codon of mouse Ace2 in exon 2. In addition to replacing mACE2, hACE2 expression is driven by the endogenous Ace2 regulatory elements. Using gene- and species-specific reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) primers, we detected hACE2 mRNA expression in the lung, nasal turbinate, kidney, duodenum, and olfactory bulb, but not in the colon, ileum, heart, spleen, or liver of hACE2 KI mice (Fig. 1A to J). This gene expression pattern overlaps but is not entirely consistent with transcriptomic and protein staining data in humans, which show ACE2 expression predominantly in the respiratory tract, kidney, and small intestine (10, 11). Single cell RNA sequencing analysis estimates that Ace2-expressing cells comprise only 1% to 6% of the total population in the nasal mucosa and respiratory tract of humans and nonhuman primates (12–14). We attempted to stain for hACE2 in the lungs using RNA in situ hybridization or immunohistochemistry but were unable to detect hACE2 mRNA or protein in hACE2 KI mice possibly due to the relatively low level of expression or the limit of detection of the assays. Indeed, in the lung and nasal turbinate, hACE2 mRNA expression was 10- to 100-fold higher in K18-hACE2 Tg mice than in hACE2 KI mice.
FIG 1
hACE2 expression in hACE2 KI and K18-hACE2 transgenic (Tg) mice. (A to J) Expression levels of hACE2 mRNA in the lung (A), nasal turbinate (B), olfactory bulb (C), heart (D), spleen (E), duodenum (F), colon (G), ileum (H), liver (I), and kidney (J) of naive 6-week-old female hACE2 KI, K18-hACE2, or wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice (two experiments, n = 2 to 4).
hACE2 expression in hACE2 KI and K18-hACE2 transgenic (Tg) mice. (A to J) Expression levels of hACE2 mRNA in the lung (A), nasal turbinate (B), olfactory bulb (C), heart (D), spleen (E), duodenum (F), colon (G), ileum (H), liver (I), and kidney (J) of naive 6-week-old female hACE2 KI, K18-hACE2, or wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice (two experiments, n = 2 to 4).
Infection of hACE2 KI mice with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.
Six-week-old homozygous hACE2 KI C57BL/6 mice were inoculated via an intranasal route with 105 focus-forming units (FFU) of SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 or B.1.1.7 or B.1.351 variants of concern (VOC). No significant weight loss was observed following infection with any of the strains (Fig. 2A), but high levels of viral RNA were detected in the lung, nasal wash, and nasal turbinate at both 3 and 7 days postinfection (dpi), with very low levels present in the olfactory bulb and brain of some animals (Fig. 2B to F). Viral RNA was not detected in the heart, spleen, brain, or gastrointestinal tract tissues (Fig. 2G to K). High levels of infectious virus were also recovered from the lungs and nasal turbinates of hACE2 KI mice at 3 dpi by plaque assay (Fig. 2L to M). The tissues supporting SARS-CoV-2 infection in this model overlap with the pattern of hACE2 mRNA expression (Fig. 1) except for the duodenum, which expresses hACE2 but did not support viral infection. No significant differences in viral burden were observed in hACE2 KI mice infected with B.1.1.7, B.1.351, or WA1/2020 strains.
FIG 2
SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 KI mice. (A to E) Six-week-old female and male hACE2 KI mice were inoculated via intranasal route with PBS or 105 FFU of WA1/2020, B.1.1.7, or B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 strains. (A) Weight change following SARS-CoV-2 or mock infection (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]; n = 6 mice per group, two experiments). (B to K) Viral RNA levels in the lung (B), nasal turbinate (C), nasal wash (D), olfactory bulb (E), brain (F), heart (G), spleen (H), duodenum (I), ileum (J), or colon (K) were analyzed at 3 and 7 dpi by RT-qPCR (n = 6 to 8, two experiments, one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Dunnett’s test comparing titers at days 3 and 7 between respective SARS-CoV-2 variants; all not significant). The dotted lines indicate the limit of detection of the assay. (L and M) Infectious virus levels in the lung (L) and nasal turbinate (M) were analyzed at 3 dpi by plaque assay on Vero-hACE2-TMPRSS2 cells (n = 7, two experiments). (N) SARS-CoV-2 RNA in situ hybridization of lung sections in hACE2 KI mice following mock infection or after intranasal inoculation with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 D614G/N501Y at 3 dpi or in K18-hACE2 mice following intranasal inoculation with 2.5 × 104 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020. Images show low-power magnification (top; bars, 500 μm), medium-power magnification (bottom; bars, 250 μm), and high-power magnification (insets in the bottom panels; bars, 100 μm). Images are representative of n = 4 per group.
SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 KI mice. (A to E) Six-week-old female and male hACE2 KI mice were inoculated via intranasal route with PBS or 105 FFU of WA1/2020, B.1.1.7, or B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 strains. (A) Weight change following SARS-CoV-2 or mock infection (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]; n = 6 mice per group, two experiments). (B to K) Viral RNA levels in the lung (B), nasal turbinate (C), nasal wash (D), olfactory bulb (E), brain (F), heart (G), spleen (H), duodenum (I), ileum (J), or colon (K) were analyzed at 3 and 7 dpi by RT-qPCR (n = 6 to 8, two experiments, one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Dunnett’s test comparing titers at days 3 and 7 between respective SARS-CoV-2 variants; all not significant). The dotted lines indicate the limit of detection of the assay. (L and M) Infectious virus levels in the lung (L) and nasal turbinate (M) were analyzed at 3 dpi by plaque assay on Vero-hACE2-TMPRSS2 cells (n = 7, two experiments). (N) SARS-CoV-2 RNA in situ hybridization of lung sections in hACE2 KI mice following mock infection or after intranasal inoculation with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 D614G/N501Y at 3 dpi or in K18-hACE2 mice following intranasal inoculation with 2.5 × 104 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020. Images show low-power magnification (top; bars, 500 μm), medium-power magnification (bottom; bars, 250 μm), and high-power magnification (insets in the bottom panels; bars, 100 μm). Images are representative of n = 4 per group.To define the tropism of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 KI mice, we stained lung sections for viral RNA using in situ hybridization (Fig. 2N). At 3 dpi, expression of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was localized to epithelial cells of the larger airways with little viral RNA detected in the lung parenchyma. In comparison, infection of K18-hACE2 Tg mice showed abundant viral RNA in lung pneumocytes with less infection of the airway-lining cells. While both types of hACE2-expressing mice support SARS-CoV-2 infection, the site of replication in the lung differs, which likely is due to promoter-driven variation in hACE2 expression on different cell types.
Inflammation in the lung following SARS-CoV-2 infection.
To assess histopathological and inflammatory changes in the lung following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the hACE2 KI model, we analyzed hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections from mock-infected animals or mice infected with WA1/2020 at 3 and 7 dpi (Fig. 3A). Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, a mild increase in immune cells and erythrocytes in the alveolar spaces was associated with vascular congestion. However, the airway architecture was largely preserved, consistent with a study reporting minimal pathology in the lungs of heterozygous hACE2 KI mice following infection with SARS-CoV-2 (9). In contrast, infection of K18-hACE2 Tg showed severe and progressive inflammation with abundant immune cells in the alveolar and interstitial locations of the lung parenchyma that was accompanied by edema, fibrin deposition, and lung consolidation (Fig. 3B).
FIG 3
Histopathological analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 KI and K18-hACE2 mice. (A) Hematoxylin-and-eosin staining of lung sections from hACE2 KI mice following mock infection or after intranasal inoculation with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 at 3 and 7 dpi. (B) Hematoxylin-and-eosin staining of lung sections from K18-hACE2 mice following mock infection or after intranasal inoculation with 2.5 × 104 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 at 4 and 7 dpi. Images show low-power (top; bars, 500 μm), medium-power (bottom; bars, 250 μm), and high-power (insets in the bottom panels; bars, 100 μm) magnification. Images are representative of n = 4 per group.
Histopathological analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 KI and K18-hACE2 mice. (A) Hematoxylin-and-eosin staining of lung sections from hACE2 KI mice following mock infection or after intranasal inoculation with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 at 3 and 7 dpi. (B) Hematoxylin-and-eosin staining of lung sections from K18-hACE2 mice following mock infection or after intranasal inoculation with 2.5 × 104 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 at 4 and 7 dpi. Images show low-power (top; bars, 500 μm), medium-power (bottom; bars, 250 μm), and high-power (insets in the bottom panels; bars, 100 μm) magnification. Images are representative of n = 4 per group.An excessive proinflammatory host response to SARS-CoV-2 infection contributes to pulmonary disease, and distinct cytokine profiles correlate with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity (15–17). Consistent with the mild lung pathology in the hACE2 KI model, relatively few of the proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (e.g., eotaxin, interleukin 2 [IL-2], IL-15, CXC chemokine ligand 9 [CXCL9], CXCL10, CC chemokine ligand 3 [CCL3], CCL4, tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]) tested showed statistically significant increases at either 3 or 7 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection (Table 1). Thus, despite sustained SARS-CoV-2 replication in the lungs of hACE2 KI mice, a more limited inflammatory response accompanies infection compared to that seen previously in K18-hACE2 mice (1). Because SARS-CoV-2 infection in hACE2 KI mice is largely restricted to the upper airways (Fig. 2F), differences in inflammation and disease severity between the K18-hACE2 and hACE2 KI mice may be due to model-dependent expression of hACE2 and infection tropism.
TABLE 1
Cytokine and chemokine analysis following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lungs of hACE2 KI mice
Cytokine or chemokine
Cytokine or chemokine protein levela
Mock
3 dpi
7 dpi
Mean (pg/mL)
SD
Mean (pg/mL)
SD
Significance compared to mock
Mean (pg/mL)
SD
Significance compared to mock
Eotaxin
59.9
1.6
224.3
41.1
***
240.4
10.9
***
G-CSF
1.0
0.2
1.7
1.0
ns
0.9
0.1
ns
GM-CSF
5.3
0.1
9.1
5.5
ns
4.1
0.9
ns
IFN-γ
2.0
0.1
3.0
0.9
ns
2.4
0.8
ns
IL-1α
63.0
1.8
83.8
23.9
ns
80.3
56.5
ns
IL-1β
1.1
0.1
1.8
0.5
ns
0.8
0.1
ns
IL-2
14.8
1.1
3.7
1.6
**
6.6
3.9
*
IL-3
0.3
0.0
1.6
1.4
ns
0.3
0.1
ns
IL-4
0.1
0.0
1.9
2.2
ns
0.2
0.0
ns
IL-5
0.5
0.0
4.1
4.3
ns
0.3
0.1
ns
IL-6
0.4
0.0
3.0
2.2
ns
0.8
0.1
ns
IL-7
1.2
0.0
2.0
0.6
ns
1.7
0.2
ns
IL-9
42.1
1.1
46.6
19.6
ns
43.2
5.8
ns
IL-10
5.0
0.4
3.5
2.0
ns
2.9
1.2
ns
IL-12p40
9.7
0.1
5.9
4.5
ns
7.7
4.1
ns
IL-12p70
ND
ND
1.2
0.4
NDt
1.2
ND
NDt
IL-13
ND
ND
0.8
0.6
NDt
0.6
0.1
NDt
IL-15
4.7
0.1
16.2
6.9
*
8.6
2.6
ns
IL-17
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.2
ns
0.1
0.0
ns
CXCL10
15.5
0.9
176.5
53.5
**
68.7
8.5
ns
CXCL1
122.3
13.7
85.4
57.3
ns
94.2
66.6
ns
LIF
0.7
0.0
2.0
0.9
ns
1.1
0.2
ns
LIX
217.2
5.3
212.6
135.0
ns
239.4
91.4
ns
CCL2
26.3
1.3
114.4
73.2
ns
48.3
5.8
ns
M-CSF
4.8
0.7
7.7
1.2
ns
6.2
1.0
ns
CXCL9
2.9
0.7
456.2
685.6
*
164.2
34.3
*
CCL3
594.9
24.6
79.4
30.4
*
349.1
240.8
ns
CCL4
0.6
0.0
53.7
11.1
***
27.2
7.5
*
CXCL2
133.6
14.1
221.9
61.3
ns
147.3
9.7
ns
CCL5
37.6
8.6
58.8
8.6
ns
86.0
16.8
ns
TNF-α
11.9
0.8
1.4
0.6
***
2.6
2.5
***
VEGF
79.3
4.3
192.1
29.8
ns
266.1
70.7
**
Cytokine and chemokine protein levels in the lungs. n = 2 mock, n = 4 for all other groups. Statistical significance was measured by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test comparing protein levels at day 3 or 7 after SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 infection to mock infection and is indicated as follows: ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05, ns, not significant. SD, standard deviation; ND, not detected; NDt, not determined.
Cytokine and chemokine analysis following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the lungs of hACE2 KI miceCytokine and chemokine protein levels in the lungs. n = 2 mock, n = 4 for all other groups. Statistical significance was measured by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test comparing protein levels at day 3 or 7 after SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020 infection to mock infection and is indicated as follows: ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05, ns, not significant. SD, standard deviation; ND, not detected; NDt, not determined.
Impact of the N501Y mutation on SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice.
In addition to mouse models engineered to express hACE2, multiple groups have adapted SARS-CoV-2 strains that allow productive infection in mice by serial passage of the virus in vivo. Several key mutations that enable infection in laboratory strains of mice (e.g., BALB/c, 129S2, or C57BL/6) have been identified in mouse-adapted strains (18–23) including an N501Y mutation in the spike protein that is also present naturally in B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 SARS-CoV-2 VOC. Although it is presumed that the N501Y mutation directly mediates binding to mACE2 to facilitate productive infection in the mouse, this has not been definitively shown in vivo. Given that mouse-adapted strains have other mutations aside from the N501Y mutation, this substitution may not be fully responsible for adaptation or may facilitate viral replication through an alternative receptor. To dissect the requirement of the N501Y mutation for mACE2, we inoculated newly generated loss-of-expression Ace2 mice (Fig. 4A and B) or wild-type C57BL/6J controls with isogenic WA1/2020 SARS-CoV-2 strains containing the D614G mutation (WA1/2020 D614G) or both the D614G and N501Y mutation (WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G). Loss of the ACE2 protein was confirmed by Western blotting of the kidney homogenates from Ace2 mice (Fig. 4C). Inoculation of wild-type C57BL/6J mice with WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G but not WA1/2020 D614G resulted in robust infection as judged by viral RNA levels in the lungs, nasal washes, and nasal turbinates (Fig. 4D to F). In contrast, Ace2 mice inoculated via an intranasal route with WA1/2020 D614G or WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G did not support viral replication. Consistent with these results, infectious virus was recovered from the lungs and nasal turbinates of wild-type but not Ace2 C57BL/6J mice inoculated with WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G (Fig. 4G and H).
FIG 4
Impact of the N501Y mutation on SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 and Ace2 mice. (A) Sequence alignment of wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 (top) and Ace2 (bottom) alleles, highlighting the guide sequence (cyan), protospacer adjacent motif (pink), and the start codon (red). Ace2 mice contain a 188-bp deletion surrounding the start codon in exon 2 of the Ace2 gene. (B) Amplification of genomic DNA from WT (+/+), heterozygote, and Ace2 homozygous mice. (C) Western blot analysis of ACE2 protein expression in the kidneys of WT and Ace2 mice. (D to F) Seven-week-old male and female ACE2-deficient (Ace2) mice or wild-type C57BL/6J controls were inoculated intranasally with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 D614G or WA1/2020 D614G/N501Y strains. Tissues were collected at 3 dpi. Viral RNA levels in the lung (D), nasal wash (E), and nasal turbinate (F) were measured (n = 6 or 7, two experiments, one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons between the indicated groups: *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01). (G and H) Infectious virus levels in the lung (G) and nasal turbinate (H) were measured at 3 dpi by plaque assay on Vero-E6 cells (n = 6 or 7, two experiments). (I to K) Six-week-old male and female hACE2 KI mice were inoculated intranasally with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 D614G or WA1/2020 D614G/N501Y strain. Tissues were collected at 3 and 7 dpi. Viral RNA levels in the lung (I), nasal wash (J), and nasal turbinate (K) were measured (n = 7 or 8, two experiments, Mann-Whitney test between the indicated groups). (L to P) Seven-week-old female K18-hACE2 mice were inoculated via the intranasal route with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 D614G or WA1/2020 D614G/N501Y strain. Tissues were collected at 3 and 6 dpi. (L) Weight change following SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean ± SEM; n = 6 mice per group, two experiments; unpaired t test of area under the curve: ****, P < 0.0001). Viral RNA levels in the lung (M), nasal wash (N), nasal turbinate (O), and brain (P) were measured (n = 6, two experiments, Mann-Whitney test between the indicated groups: *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01). Dotted line indicates the limit of detection of the assay. ns, not significant.
Impact of the N501Y mutation on SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 and Ace2 mice. (A) Sequence alignment of wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 (top) and Ace2 (bottom) alleles, highlighting the guide sequence (cyan), protospacer adjacent motif (pink), and the start codon (red). Ace2 mice contain a 188-bp deletion surrounding the start codon in exon 2 of the Ace2 gene. (B) Amplification of genomic DNA from WT (+/+), heterozygote, and Ace2 homozygous mice. (C) Western blot analysis of ACE2 protein expression in the kidneys of WT and Ace2 mice. (D to F) Seven-week-old male and female ACE2-deficient (Ace2) mice or wild-type C57BL/6J controls were inoculated intranasally with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 D614G or WA1/2020 D614G/N501Y strains. Tissues were collected at 3 dpi. Viral RNA levels in the lung (D), nasal wash (E), and nasal turbinate (F) were measured (n = 6 or 7, two experiments, one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons between the indicated groups: *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01). (G and H) Infectious virus levels in the lung (G) and nasal turbinate (H) were measured at 3 dpi by plaque assay on Vero-E6 cells (n = 6 or 7, two experiments). (I to K) Six-week-old male and female hACE2 KI mice were inoculated intranasally with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 D614G or WA1/2020 D614G/N501Y strain. Tissues were collected at 3 and 7 dpi. Viral RNA levels in the lung (I), nasal wash (J), and nasal turbinate (K) were measured (n = 7 or 8, two experiments, Mann-Whitney test between the indicated groups). (L to P) Seven-week-old female K18-hACE2 mice were inoculated via the intranasal route with 105 FFU of WA1/2020 D614G or WA1/2020 D614G/N501Y strain. Tissues were collected at 3 and 6 dpi. (L) Weight change following SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean ± SEM; n = 6 mice per group, two experiments; unpaired t test of area under the curve: ****, P < 0.0001). Viral RNA levels in the lung (M), nasal wash (N), nasal turbinate (O), and brain (P) were measured (n = 6, two experiments, Mann-Whitney test between the indicated groups: *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01). Dotted line indicates the limit of detection of the assay. ns, not significant.As the N501Y substitution increases the affinity of spike protein binding to ACE2 and confers a replication advantage in hamsters and primary human airway epithelial cells (24–26), we determined its impact in hACE2 KI mice by inoculating 6-week-old female animals via the intranasal route with either WA1/2020 D614G or WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G. Viral titers in the lungs and nasal washes generally were similar at 3 and 7 dpi between mice inoculated with the two viruses (Fig. 4I to K). Nonetheless, we did observe a trend toward an increase in viral RNA levels at 7 dpi in the nasal turbinates of mice inoculated with WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G compared to WA1/2020 D614G. Future in vivo competition or transmission studies may be needed to distinguish the impact of the N501Y mutation in hACE2 KI mice.In addition to expression of hACE2 as a transgene under the cytokeratin promoter, K18-hACE2 mice also express mACE2 from its endogenous promoter. Accordingly, we hypothesized that infection of K18-hACE2 mice with viruses containing the N501Y adaptive mutation might enhance pathogenesis through utilization of both mACE2 and hACE2 receptor. K18-hACE2 mice infected with WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G lost weight more rapidly and sustained higher viral titers in the lung and nasal washes at 3 dpi, but not in the brain or nasal turbinates, compared to infection with the WA1/2020 D614G virus (Fig. 4L to P). The increased infectivity and pathogenicity of WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G in K18-hACE2 mice could be due to enhanced binding to hACE2 independent of adaptation to mACE2. However, differences in infectivity between WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G and WA1/2020 D614G in hACE2 KI mice, which lack mACE2 expression entirely, were minimal, which suggests that enhanced interaction with hACE2 is not the principal explanation. Regardless, our experiments establish an in vivo requirement for mACE2 in the adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 strains containing the N501Y mutation to mice.
DISCUSSION
The rapid generation of small animal models has been instrumental in testing antiviral countermeasures as well as furthering our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. However, at present, no animal model fully recapitulates all aspects of COVID-19, and the continued development of models is necessary to address the diverse spectrum of biology and pathophysiology encompassed by SARS-CoV-2 infection. In this study, we evaluated the homozygous hACE2 KI mouse as a model of SARS-CoV-2 infection in comparison to the K18-hACE2 Tg model. Both models supported viral infection of the upper and lower respiratory tracts with roughly equivalent viral titers in the nasal turbinates. However, K18-hACE2 Tg mice had substantially higher viral titers (∼1,000-fold) in the lung compared to the hACE2 KI model with greater infection of the alveolar pneumocytes that was not apparent in the hACE2 KI model where infection appeared restricted to epithelial cells of the larger airways. Whereas infection of K18-hACE2 Tg mice is accompanied by profound lung pathology, significant weight loss, viral spread to extrapulmonary organs, and mortality (1, 27–29), infection of hACE2 KI mice showed more limited lung inflammation without overt clinical disease or substantial viral spread beyond the respiratory tract. Thus, although both models rely upon hACE2 expression to sustain productive SARS-CoV-2 infection, our study highlights the differences in outcome and infection tropism, which likely reflects the site and amount of hACE2 expression. Consistent with this idea, two additional models of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis in mice have been generated by using adenovirus (Adv) (30, 31) or adeno-associated virus (AAV) (32) to transduce cells in the respiratory tract with hACE2. Mice transduced with Adv or AAV encoding hACE2 support SARS-CoVo2 replication in the lung and show evidence of moderate to severe pulmonary pathology but do not develop mortality seen in K18-hACE2 Tg mice, possibly because of the more restricted hACE2 receptor expression in the respiratory tract.Our finding that homozygous hACE2 KI mice supported SARS-CoV-2 infection in the upper and lower respiratory tracts with minimal disease or lung pathology is generally consistent with prior reports with heterozygous hACE2 KI mice (9) or in a different hACE2 KI mouse strain (31). However, we detected little, if any, viral RNA in the brains of hACE2 KI mice, which contrasts with a previous report following intranasal inoculation (31); the differences in results could be explained by the differential presence of furin cleavage site mutations in viral stocks (33), subtle variation between the two hACE2 KI mouse strains, or animal facility differences that impact the microbiome and gastrointestinal tract effects on the blood-brain barrier (34). In the lungs of hACE2 KI mice, viral infection was restricted to cells of the larger airways with no apparent infection in the alveoli of the lung. Although we were unable to identify hACE2-expressing cells in the lungs using immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization, knock-in mice that coexpressed tdTomato and hACE2 reported hACE2 expression on club cells of the bronchiolar epithelium but not in the more abundant type I alveolar pneumocytes (31).Based on human transcriptomic and proteomic studies, ACE2 is expressed at low levels in the respiratory tract (10, 11, 35). Indeed, single cell RNA sequencing studies estimated that only 1% to 6% of cells express ACE2 in the respiratory tract, principally in airway epithelial cells, type II pneumocytes, and nasal goblet cells (13, 36, 37). A large meta-analysis demonstrated an increase in the expression of ACE2 and the entry factor protease TMPRSS2 with age, in men, and with smoking (38), which correlated with findings in mice showing increased ACE2 expression with age and exposure to cigarette smoke and vaping (39, 40). Because infection is confined largely to the airway and not lung parenchyma, the hACE2 KI mouse could provide a model of self-limited infection, mild COVID-19 disease, and possibly transmission. Moreover, because these mice are on a C57BL/6 background, they can be crossed to other transgenic mice or combined with treatments to explore how specific immune functions or risk factors (e.g., diabetes, age, or obesity) modulate SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis in the setting of physiological hACE2 expression.We also determined the impact of the N501Y mutation in multiple murine models. The adaptation of SARS-CoV-2 through serial passage in vivo has established key mutations that enable infection in mice. All SARS-CoV-2 strains that are adapted to mice contain mutations in the spike protein (20, 22, 41), and many encode an N501Y mutation (18, 21, 23) that is also present naturally in B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1 SARS-CoV-2 VOC. While biochemical data and experiments in cell lines demonstrated increased binding affinity and infectivity of the N501Y spike for mouse ACE2 (23, 25, 42), it had not yet been demonstrated in vivo that the N501Y mutation alone is sufficient to promote infection in mice since all mouse-adapted strains contain additional mutations. Introduction of the N501Y mutation into the WA1/2020 D614G SARS-CoV-2 backbone was sufficient to enable viral replication in wild-type C57BL/6 mice in a mACE2-dependent manner. Notwithstanding this point, it is likely that additional mutations present in mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 strains enhance pathogenesis beyond that observed with the WA1/2020 N501Y virus alone.The enhanced SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis in K18-hACE2 Tg mice that is seen with viruses containing N501Y mutations could be due to either the ability of the virus to engage both hACE2 and mACE2 or increased binding to hACE2 (24, 43). As the N501Y mutation had a minimal impact in the hACE2 KI model, which does not express mACE2, following infection with WA1/2020 N501Y/D614G virus or the N501Y-containing VOC B.1.1.7 and B.1.351, it appears that an enhanced interaction with hACE2 is not the principal explanation. Although multiple studies have highlighted the increased affinity of the N501Y spike for hACE2, conflicting reports exist as to whether this mutation translates to higher infectivity in vivo (24, 26). Future virus competition studies in vivo in hACE2 KI mice may be needed to fully determine the biological impact of the N501Y mutation on pathogenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells.
Vero-TMPRSS2 cells (44) were cultured at 37°C in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.3), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1× nonessential amino acids, and 100 U/ml of penicillin-streptomycin. Vero-TMPRSS2 cells were supplemented with 5 μg/mL of blasticidin.
Viruses.
The WA1/2020 recombinant strain with substitutions (D614G or N501Y/D614G) were obtained from an infectious cDNA clone of the 2019n-CoV/USA_WA1/2020 strain and described previously (45). The WA1/2020, B.1.1.7, and B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 isolates were obtained from nasopharyngeal isolates and have been reported previously (3, 30, 46). All viruses were passaged once in Vero-TMPRSS2 cells and subjected to next-generation sequencing as described previously (46) to confirm the introduction and stability of substitutions.
Biosafety.
This study was approved by the office of Environmental Health and Safety at Washington University School of Medicine and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai prior to the initiation of experiments. All SARS-CoV-2 experiments were performed in approved biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) facilities by personnel equipped with powered air-purifying respirators.
Mice.
Animal studies were carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (47). The protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Washington University School of Medicine (assurance number A3381–01). Virus inoculations were performed under anesthesia that was induced and maintained with ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine, and all efforts were made to minimize animal suffering.Heterozygous K18-hACE2 C57BL/6J mice [strain 2B6.Cg-Tg(K18-ACE2)2Prlmn/J], hACE2 KI mice [B6.129S2(Cg)-Ace2tm1(ACE2)Dwnt/J], and wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. Ace2 loss-of-function mice were generated by injecting a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex of 20 ng/µL Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 single guide RNA (sgRNA), guide sequence GGATGGGATCTTGGCGCACG, PAM: GGG (IDT) and 20 ng/µL Cas9 protein (IDT, Alt-R S.p.-Cas9 nuclease-V3, catalog number 1081058) into the male pronuclei of one-cell stage C57BL/6J mouse embryos. After injection, the embryos were returned to the oviducts of pseudopregnant Swiss-Webster females that had been mated the day before with vasectomized Swiss-Webster males. Resulting pups were characterized by deep sequencing and PCR. Mice were genotyped by PCR using the primers GAGGGAGAGGATGGATAGCTT-5′F and TGCTGCCTTCAGTAAACCCC-3′R and the PCR conditions 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 4 min at 72°C. To confirm loss of the ACE2 protein, kidneys collected from adult WT C57BL/6 and Ace2 mice were homogenized (MP FastPrep-24, 6 m/s, 30 s) in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Boston BioProducts) supplemented with Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche). Following protein quantification by Pierce bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific), 80 μg of total protein was loaded into 10% Mini-Protean TGX Precast Protein Gels (Bio-Rad), electrophoretically separated, transferred to 0.2-μm polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore Sigma) using wet electroblotting, and blocked in 5% nonfat powdered milk (Boston BioProducts) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (Fisher Bioreagents). Membranes were blotted against mACE2 (R&D Systems, MAB3437, clone 460502) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Cell Signaling Technology, catalog number 88845) and visualized using a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rat IgG (Scientific Laboratory Supplies, code NA935). KwikQuant Western Blot Detection kit (Kindle Biosciences, catalog number R1004) was used for detection.Animals were housed in groups and fed standard chow diets. Six- to eight-week-old male and female mice were either administered 2.5 × 104 PFU of SARS-CoV-2 (K18-hACE2) or 105 FFU of SARS-CoV-2 (hACE2 KI, Ace2 and WT C57BL/6) via intranasal administration while under anesthesia induced by ketamine and xylazine.
Focus-forming assay.
Serial dilutions of viral stocks were added to Vero-TMPRSS2 cell monolayers in 96-well plates and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Subsequently, cells were overlaid with 1% (wt/vol) methylcellulose in minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 2% FBS. Plates were harvested 30 h later by removing overlays and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min at room temperature. Plates were washed and sequentially incubated with an oligoclonal pool of SARS2-2, SARS2-11, SARS2-16, SARS2-31, SARS2-38, SARS2-57, and SARS2-71 (48) anti-S antibodies and HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma, catalog number 12-349) in PBS supplemented with 0.1% saponin and 0.1% bovine serum albumin. SARS-CoV-2-infected cell foci were visualized using TrueBlue peroxidase substrate (KPL) and quantitated on an ImmunoSpot microanalyzer (Cellular Technologies).
Measurement of viral burden and hACE2 expression.
Tissues were weighed and homogenized with zirconia beads in a MagNA Lyser instrument (Roche Life Science) in 1 ml of DMEM medium supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated FBS. Tissue homogenates were clarified by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 5 min and stored at −80°C. RNA was extracted using the MagMax mirVana Total RNA isolation kit (Thermo Scientific) on a Kingfisher Flex extraction robot (Thermo Scientific). RNA was reverse transcribed and amplified using the TaqMan RNA-to-CT 1-Step kit (ThermoFisher). Reverse transcription was carried out at 48°C for 15 min followed by 2 min at 95°C. Amplification was accomplished over 50 cycles as follows: 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. The number of copies of SARS-CoV-2 N-gene RNA in samples was determined using a previously published assay (49). Briefly, a TaqMan assay was designed to target a highly conserved region of the N gene (forward primer, ATGCTGCAATCGTGCTACAA; reverse primer, GACTGCCGCCTCTGCTC; probe, 5,6-carboxyfluorescein [56-FAM]/TCAAGGAAC/ZEN/AACATTGCCAA/3IABkFQ/). This region was included in an RNA standard to allow for copy number determination to 10 copies per reaction. The reaction mixture contained final concentrations of primers and probe of 500 and 100 nM, respectively.Vero-ACE2-TMPRSS2 (50) or Vero-E6 cells were seeded at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells per well in flat-bottom 12-well tissue culture plates. The following day, medium was removed and replaced with 200 μL of 10-fold serial dilutions of clarified tissue homogenates diluted in DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS. One hour later, 1 mL of methylcellulose overlay was added. Plates were incubated for 72 h and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (final concentration) in phosphate-buffered saline for 20 min. Plates were stained with 0.05% (wt/vol) crystal violet in 20% methanol and washed twice with distilled, deionized water before scoring.For hACE2 expression, RNA was treated with DNase (Thermo Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA levels were quantified as described above with the primer/probe set for hACE2 (IDT assay: Hs.PT.58.27645939), compared to an RNA standard curve, and normalized per milligram of tissue.
Cytokine and chemokine protein measurements.
Lung homogenates were incubated with Triton X-100 (1% final concentration) for 1 h at room temperature to inactivate SARS-CoV-2. Homogenates then were analyzed for cytokines and chemokines by Eve Technologies Corporation (Calgary, AB, Canada) using their Mouse Cytokine Array/Chemokine Array 44-Plex (MD44) platform.
Histology and RNA in situ hybridization.
Animals were euthanized before harvest and fixation of tissues. The left lung was tied off at the left main bronchus and collected for viral RNA analysis. The right lung was then inflated with ∼1.2 mL of 10% neutral buffered formalin using a 3-mL syringe and catheter inserted into the trachea. Tissues were embedded in paraffin, and sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. RNA in situ hybridization was performed using the RNAscope 2.5 HD Assay (Brown kit) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Briefly, sections were deparaffinized and treated with H2O2 and Protease Plus before probe hybridization. Probes specifically targeting hACE2 (catalog number 848151) or SARS-CoV-2 spike sequence (catalog number 848561) were hybridized followed by proprietary signal amplification and detection with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine. Tissues were counterstained with Gill’s hematoxylin. An uninfected mouse was used as a negative control and stained in parallel. Images were captured using a Nanozoomer (Hamamatsu) instrument at the Alafi Neuroimaging Core at Washington University.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical significance was assigned when P values were <0.05 using Prism version 8 (GraphPad). Specific tests and multiple comparison corrections are indicated in the figure legends.
Data availability.
All data supporting the findings of this study are found within the paper and are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Authors: Jessica A Plante; Yang Liu; Jianying Liu; Hongjie Xia; Bryan A Johnson; Kumari G Lokugamage; Xianwen Zhang; Antonio E Muruato; Jing Zou; Camila R Fontes-Garfias; Divya Mirchandani; Dionna Scharton; John P Bilello; Zhiqiang Ku; Zhiqiang An; Birte Kalveram; Alexander N Freiberg; Vineet D Menachery; Xuping Xie; Kenneth S Plante; Scott C Weaver; Pei-Yong Shi Journal: Nature Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Christoph Muus; Malte D Luecken; Gökcen Eraslan; Lisa Sikkema; Avinash Waghray; Graham Heimberg; Yoshihiko Kobayashi; Eeshit Dhaval Vaishnav; Ayshwarya Subramanian; Christopher Smillie; Karthik A Jagadeesh; Elizabeth Thu Duong; Evgenij Fiskin; Elena Torlai Triglia; Meshal Ansari; Peiwen Cai; Brian Lin; Justin Buchanan; Sijia Chen; Jian Shu; Adam L Haber; Hattie Chung; Daniel T Montoro; Taylor Adams; Hananeh Aliee; Samuel J Allon; Zaneta Andrusivova; Ilias Angelidis; Orr Ashenberg; Kevin Bassler; Christophe Bécavin; Inbal Benhar; Joseph Bergenstråhle; Ludvig Bergenstråhle; Liam Bolt; Emelie Braun; Linh T Bui; Steven Callori; Mark Chaffin; Evgeny Chichelnitskiy; Joshua Chiou; Thomas M Conlon; Michael S Cuoco; Anna S E Cuomo; Marie Deprez; Grant Duclos; Denise Fine; David S Fischer; Shila Ghazanfar; Astrid Gillich; Bruno Giotti; Joshua Gould; Minzhe Guo; Austin J Gutierrez; Arun C Habermann; Tyler Harvey; Peng He; Xiaomeng Hou; Lijuan Hu; Yan Hu; Alok Jaiswal; Lu Ji; Peiyong Jiang; Theodoros S Kapellos; Christin S Kuo; Ludvig Larsson; Michael A Leney-Greene; Kyungtae Lim; Monika Litviňuková; Leif S Ludwig; Soeren Lukassen; Wendy Luo; Henrike Maatz; Elo Madissoon; Lira Mamanova; Kasidet Manakongtreecheep; Sylvie Leroy; Christoph H Mayr; Ian M Mbano; Alexi M McAdams; Ahmad N Nabhan; Sarah K Nyquist; Lolita Penland; Olivier B Poirion; Sergio Poli; CanCan Qi; Rachel Queen; Daniel Reichart; Ivan Rosas; Jonas C Schupp; Conor V Shea; Xingyi Shi; Rahul Sinha; Rene V Sit; Kamil Slowikowski; Michal Slyper; Neal P Smith; Alex Sountoulidis; Maximilian Strunz; Travis B Sullivan; Dawei Sun; Carlos Talavera-López; Peng Tan; Jessica Tantivit; Kyle J Travaglini; Nathan R Tucker; Katherine A Vernon; Marc H Wadsworth; Julia Waldman; Xiuting Wang; Ke Xu; Wenjun Yan; William Zhao; Carly G K Ziegler Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 87.241
Authors: Zhuoming Liu; Laura A VanBlargan; Louis-Marie Bloyet; Paul W Rothlauf; Rita E Chen; Spencer Stumpf; Haiyan Zhao; John M Errico; Elitza S Theel; Mariel J Liebeskind; Brynn Alford; William J Buchser; Ali H Ellebedy; Daved H Fremont; Michael S Diamond; Sean P J Whelan Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 31.316
Authors: Fatai S Oladunni; Jun-Gyu Park; Paula A Pino; Olga Gonzalez; Anwari Akhter; Anna Allué-Guardia; Angélica Olmo-Fontánez; Shalini Gautam; Andreu Garcia-Vilanova; Chengjin Ye; Kevin Chiem; Colwyn Headley; Varun Dwivedi; Laura M Parodi; Kendra J Alfson; Hilary M Staples; Alyssa Schami; Juan I Garcia; Alison Whigham; Roy Neal Platt; Michal Gazi; Jesse Martinez; Colin Chuba; Stephanie Earley; Oscar H Rodriguez; Stephanie Davis Mdaki; Katrina N Kavelish; Renee Escalona; Cory R A Hallam; Corbett Christie; Jean L Patterson; Tim J C Anderson; Ricardo Carrion; Edward J Dick; Shannan Hall-Ursone; Larry S Schlesinger; Xavier Alvarez; Deepak Kaushal; Luis D Giavedoni; Joanne Turner; Luis Martinez-Sobrido; Jordi B Torrelles Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Antonio Muruato; Michelle N Vu; Bryan A Johnson; Meredith E Davis-Gardner; Abigail Vanderheiden; Kumari Lokugamage; Craig Schindewolf; Patricia A Crocquet-Valdes; Rose M Langsjoen; Jessica A Plante; Kenneth S Plante; Scott C Weaver; Kari Debbink; Andrew L Routh; David Walker; Mehul S Suthar; Pei-Yong Shi; Xuping Xie; Vineet D Menachery Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Jorge A Masso-Silva; Alexander Moshensky; John Shin; Jarod Olay; Sedtavut Nilaad; Ira Advani; Christine M Bojanowski; Shane Crotty; Wei Tse Li; Weg M Ongkeko; Sunit Singla; Laura E Crotty Alexander Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Soeren Lukassen; Robert Lorenz Chua; Timo Trefzer; Nicolas C Kahn; Marc A Schneider; Michael Kreuter; Christian Conrad; Roland Eils; Thomas Muley; Hauke Winter; Michael Meister; Carmen Veith; Agnes W Boots; Bianca P Hennig Journal: EMBO J Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Mericien Venzon; Lucie Bernard-Raichon; Jon Klein; Jordan E Axelrad; Chenzhen Zhang; Grant A Hussey; Alexis P Sullivan; Arnau Casanovas-Massana; Maria G Noval; Ana M Valero-Jimenez; Juan Gago; Gregory Putzel; Alejandro Pironti; Evan Wilder; Lorna E Thorpe; Dan R Littman; Meike Dittmann; Kenneth A Stapleford; Bo Shopsin; Victor J Torres; Albert I Ko; Akiko Iwasaki; Ken Cadwell; Jonas Schluter Journal: bioRxiv Date: 2022-03-02
Authors: Zhenlu Chong; Courtney E Karl; Peter J Halfmann; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Emma S Winkler; Shamus P Keeler; Michael J Holtzman; Jinsheng Yu; Michael S Diamond Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 9.995
Authors: Zhenlu Chong; Courtney E Karl; Peter J Halfmann; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Emma S Winkler; Jinsheng Yu; Michael S Diamond Journal: bioRxiv Date: 2022-01-24