Literature DB >> 34665669

Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.

Brian A Nosek1,2, Tom E Hardwicke3, Hannah Moshontz4, Aurélien Allard5, Katherine S Corker6, Anna Dreber7, Fiona Fidler8, Joe Hilgard9, Melissa Kline Struhl2, Michèle B Nuijten10, Julia M Rohrer11, Felipe Romero12, Anne M Scheel13, Laura D Scherer14, Felix D Schönbrodt15, Simine Vazire16.   

Abstract

Replication-an important, uncommon, and misunderstood practice-is gaining appreciation in psychology. Achieving replicability is important for making research progress. If findings are not replicable, then prediction and theory development are stifled. If findings are replicable, then interrogation of their meaning and validity can advance knowledge. Assessing replicability can be productive for generating and testing hypotheses by actively confronting current understandings to identify weaknesses and spur innovation. For psychology, the 2010s might be characterized as a decade of active confrontation. Systematic and multi-site replication projects assessed current understandings and observed surprising failures to replicate many published findings. Replication efforts highlighted sociocultural challenges such as disincentives to conduct replications and a tendency to frame replication as a personal attack rather than a healthy scientific practice, and they raised awareness that replication contributes to self-correction. Nevertheless, innovation in doing and understanding replication and its cousins, reproducibility and robustness, has positioned psychology to improve research practices and accelerate progress.

Entities:  

Keywords:  generalizability; metascience; replication; reproducibility; research methods; robustness; statistical inference; theory; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34665669     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol        ISSN: 0066-4308            Impact factor:   24.137


  13 in total

1.  Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Aviva Philipp-Muller; Spike W S Lee; Richard E Petty
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports.

Authors:  Randall J Ellis
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-08-03

3.  Peekbank: An open, large-scale repository for developmental eye-tracking data of children's word recognition.

Authors:  Martin Zettersten; Daniel Yurovsky; Tian Linger Xu; Sarp Uner; Angeline Sin Mei Tsui; Rose M Schneider; Annissa N Saleh; Stephan C Meylan; Virginia A Marchman; Jessica Mankewitz; Kyle MacDonald; Bria Long; Molly Lewis; George Kachergis; Kunal Handa; Benjamin deMayo; Alexandra Carstensen; Mika Braginsky; Veronica Boyce; Naiti S Bhatt; Claire Augusta Bergey; Michael C Frank
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-08-24

Review 4.  Open and reproducible science practices in psychoneuroendocrinology: Opportunities to foster scientific progress.

Authors:  Maria Meier; Tina B Lonsdorf; Sonia J Lupien; Tobias Stalder; Sebastian Laufer; Maurizio Sicorello; Roman Linz; Lara M C Puhlmann
Journal:  Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol       Date:  2022-05-30

5.  All-Cause Mortality in People with Co-Occurring Insomnia Symptoms and Sleep Apnea: Analysis of the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort.

Authors:  Bastien Lechat; Kelly A Loffler; Douglas M Wallace; Amy Reynolds; Sarah L Appleton; Hannah Scott; Andrew Vakulin; Nicole Lovato; Robert Adams; Danny J Eckert; Peter G Catcheside; Alexander Sweetman
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2022-10-13

6.  Politicizing mask-wearing: predicting the success of behavioral interventions among republicans and democrats in the U.S.

Authors:  Eugen Dimant; Elena Giulia Clemente; Dylan Pieper; Anna Dreber; Michele Gelfand
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Response to Commentaries on Sakaluk (2020).

Authors:  John K Sakaluk
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-09

8.  Personality and Peripartum Changes in Perceived Social Support: Findings From Two Prospective-Longitudinal Studies in (Expectant) Mothers and Fathers.

Authors:  Eva Asselmann; Susan Garthus-Niegel; Julia Martini
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology.

Authors:  Timothy M Errington; Maya Mathur; Courtney K Soderberg; Alexandria Denis; Nicole Perfito; Elizabeth Iorns; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  Common-sense approaches to sharing tabular data alongside publication.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tierney; Karthik Ram
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2021-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.