| Literature DB >> 34660933 |
A M M U Adikari1, Hasitha Priyashantha2, J N K Disanayaka3, D V Jayatileka4, S P Kodithuwakku3,5, J A M S Jayatilake6, J K Vidanarachchi3.
Abstract
Traditional fermented buffalo milk gel; Meekiri, is a popular buffalo milk-derived product in Sri Lanka. Predominantly, it is produced using the back-slopping (adding a small amount of the previous fermentate) technique, following the life-long traditions available at the cottage level. Hence, diverse and unclassified starter cultures are likely to be established across the varying geographical regions of Meekiri production. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the diversity of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and their characteristics including probiotic properties from major Meekeri production areas (n = 22) in Sri Lanka. Lactic acid bacteria was isolated from locally produced Meekiri samples (n = 23) and characterized based on morphological, biochemical, physiological profiles and potential of probiotic properties. The isolates revealed five different colony and cell morphologies and were classified as heterofermenters, homofermenters and facultative heterofermenters based on CO2 production using glucose. None of the isolates showed the ability to grow either at 5 °C or 0 °C, while 71 % and 100 % survival of the isolates were observed at 15 °C and 45 °C, respectively. Amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) primarily grouped the isolates into three distinct clusters based on their DNA banding patterns. Subsequently, 16S rRNA sequencing of isolates revealed the presence of four species namely, Limosilactobacillus fermentum (n = 18), Latilactobacillus curvatus (n = 2), Lactobacillus acidophilus (n = 2) and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (n = 1) and in the phylogenetic analysis, it was represented by four distinctive clades. All the isolated species demonstrated promising probiotic potential with antibiotic sensitivity, antimicrobial properties, bile acid tolerance and acid tolerance. In conclusion, traditional back-slopping Meekiri in Sri Lanka contains diverse LAB, with a negligible geographical variation at species-level. Our work provides a strong foundation and insights into future applications in starter culture development for the fermentation of buffalo's milk.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; Buffalo milk; Lactic acid bacteria; Meekiri; Probiotic
Year: 2021 PMID: 34660933 PMCID: PMC8503854 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Sampling sites of Sri Lankan back-slopping Meekiri.
Figure 2Colony characteristics and cell morphology of LAB isolated from Sri Lankan back-slopping Meekiri.
Figure 3ARDRA patterns with HaeIII restriction enzyme digestion of the LAB, isolated from back-slopping Sri Lankan Meekiri. A: L. fermentum and L. plantarum, B: L. curvatus and C: L. acidophilus, L = ladder (Promega, USA).
Figure 4Phylogenetic tree describing the relationship of isolated LAB from Sri Lankan back-slopping Meekiri.
Physiological characteristics of LAB, isolated from back-slopping Sri Lankan Meekiri.
| Species | Type of the species | Gene bank accession | Isolated geological region | Gas production from glucose | Sugar fermentation | Growth at different conditions | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (˚C) | NaCl concentrations (%) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Arabinose | Galactose | Lactose | Maltose | Manitol | Melezitose | Melibiose | Raffinose | Salicin | Sorbitol | Trehalose | 5 | 10 | 15 | 45 | 2 | 4 | 6.5 | |||||
| LF | I | MN960294 | Ampara | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + |
| MN960282 | Ampara | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | ||
| MN960296 | Hambanthota | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | ||
| MN960299 | Matara | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| MN960289 | Jaffna | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| MN960285 | Anuradhapura | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| MN960286 | Buttala | + | - | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| MN960293 | Kandy | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| MN960291 | Mathara | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| MN960283 | Mathara | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| MN960291 | Mathara | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| II | MN960297 | Anuradapura | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | |
| MN960284 | Chilaw | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | ||
| MN960295 | Melsiripura | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | ||
| III | MN960288 | Katharagama | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | |
| MN960292 | Katharagama | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | ||
| MN960287 | Kurunegala | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | - | ||
| MN960298 | Kurunegala | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| LA | IV | MN960278 | Tissamaharamaya | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | - |
| MN960279 | Weligama | - | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | - | ||
| LC | V | MN960280 | Weligama | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | + |
| MN960277 | Weligama | + | - | + | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | + | + | + | ||
| LP | I | MN960281 | Jaffna | v | + | + | + | + | - | - | + | + | + | - | + | - | - | + | + | + | + | - |
Limosilactobacillus fermentum (LF); Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA); Latilactobacillus curvatus (LC); Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LP).
(+): positive reaction, (-): negative reaction, (V): variable, where isolates showed both positive and negative results when the experiment was conducted in duplicate.
Probiotic properties of LAB, isolated from Sri Lankan back-slopping Meekiri.
| Species and the type | Antibiotic sensitivity | Antimicrobial property (average inhibitory zone in mm) | Bile acid tolerance (%reduction of CFU) | Acid tolerance (% Reduction of CFU) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gentamicin | Erthromycin | Amoxicillin | Vancomycin | Ampicillin | Chloramphenicol | Clindamycin | Tetracycline | |||||||||
| LF (I) | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | 04.75 ± 1.1b | 09.75 ± 0.4a | 02.00 ± 0.7a | 05.25 ± 0.3a | 09.00 ± 1.4a | 05.50 ± 0.7a | 76.92 | 11.92 |
| LF (II) | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | 05.75 ± 1.1b | 08.75 ± 0.4a | 01.75 ± 0.4a | 06.25 ± 0.3a | 05.25 ± 1.1a | 05.00 ± 1.4a | 64.11 | 09.05 |
| LF (III) | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | 07.00 ± 1.4b | 07.75 ± 1.1a | 02.25 ± 0.4a | 05.00 ± 1.4a | 06.75 ± 1.1a | 05.75 ± 1.1a | 70.71 | 09.89 |
| LA (IV) | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | 12.75 ± 0.3a | 13.25 ± 1.1a | 02.75 ± 0.4a | 10.25 ± 1.1a | 10.75 ± 1.1a | 04.75 ± 0.3a | 07.34 | 13.99 |
| LC (V) | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | S | 11.00 ± 0.7a | 13.75 ± 1.8a | 02.50 ± 0.7a | 09.25 ± 1.8a | 07.75 ± 2.5a | 06.25 ± 1.1a | 55.05 | 29.47 |
| LP (I) | S | S | S | R | S | S | S | S | 10.75 + 1.1a | 14.25 + 1.8a | 02.75 + 1.1a | 10.5 + 2.8a | 07.25 + 1.8a | 05.75 + 1.1a | 07.47 | 38.92 |
Results are shown as mean ± SE. Means within the same column bearing different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). CFU: colony-forming units Limosilactobacillus fermentum (LF); Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA); Latilactobacillus curvatus (LC); Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (LP); S = sensitive, R = resistance.
pH variation of raw milk (buffalo's milk and cow's milk as the control) by isolated LAB from Sri Lankan back-slopping Meekiri.
| Species and the type | pH of Cow milk | pH of Buffalo milk | pH reduction in cow milk | pH reduction in buffalo milk | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before incubation | After incubation | Before incubation | After incubation | |||
| LF (I) | 6.42 + 0.01 | 5.41 + 0.02 | 6.64 + 0.02 | 5.62 + 0.04 | 1.01 ± 0.03d | 1.02 ± 0.02d |
| LF (II) | 6.45 + 0.01 | 5.17 + 0.01 | 6.57 + 0.01 | 5.26 + 0.04 | 1.28 ± 0.02c | 1.31 ± 0.03c |
| LF (III) | 6.43 + 0.03 | 4.84 + 0.00 | 6.60 + 0.00 | 5.12 + 0.11 | 1.59 ± 0.03a | 1.48 ± 0.11a |
| LA (IV) | 6.42 + 0.06 | 4.89 + 0.02 | 6.53 + 0.02 | 5.06 + 0.03 | 1.53 ± 0.04a | 1.47 ± 0.05a |
| LC (V) | 6.48 + 0.08 | 4.86 + 0.00 | 6.58 + 0.00 | 5.06 + 0.11 | 1.62 ± 0.08a | 1.52 ± 0.11a |
| LP | 6.45 + 0.00 | 5.02 + 0.02 | 6.53 + 0.02 | 5.15 + 0.03 | 1.43 + 0.02b | 1.38 + 0.01b |
Results are shown as mean ± SE. The incubation period was 16 h.
Means within the same column bearing different superscripts are significantly different.
(p < 0.05).