Literature DB >> 34657975

Development and assessment of machine learning models for predicting recurrence risk after endovascular treatment in patients with intracranial aneurysms.

ShiTeng Lin1,2, Yang Zou3, Jue Hu4, Lan Xiang5, LeHeng Guo5, XinPing Lin1,2, DaiZun Zou1,2, Xiaoping Gao5, Hui Liang5, JianJun Zou6,7, ZhiHong Zhao8, XiaoMing Dai9.   

Abstract

Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remain a major public health concern and endovascular treatment (EVT) has become a major tool for managing IAs. However, the recurrence rate of IAs after EVT is relatively high, which may lead to the risk for aneurysm re-rupture and re-bleed. Thus, we aimed to develop and assess prediction models based on machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict recurrence risk among patients with IAs after EVT in 6 months. Patient population included patients with IAs after EVT between January 2016 and August 2019 in Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, and an adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) sampling approach was applied for the entire imbalanced dataset. We developed five ML models and assessed the models. In addition, we used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) algorithms to determine the importance of the selected features and interpret the ML models. A total of 425 IAs were enrolled into this study, and 66 (15.5%) of which recurred in 6 months. Among the five ML models, gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model performed best. The area under curve (AUC) of the GBDT model on the testing set was 0.842 (sensitivity: 81.2%; specificity: 70.4%). Our study firstly demonstrated that ML-based models can serve as a reliable tool for predicting recurrence risk in patients with IAs after EVT in 6 months, and the GBDT model showed the optimal prediction performance.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endovascular treatment; Intracranial aneurysms; Machine learning; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34657975     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01665-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   2.800


  31 in total

Review 1.  Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature, part 1: reducing recurrence after endovascular coiling.

Authors:  E Crobeddu; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Patient- and Aneurysm-Specific Risk Factors for Intracranial Aneurysm Growth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daan Backes; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Kamil G Laban; Ale Algra; Mervyn D I Vergouwen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Review of 2 decades of aneurysm-recurrence literature, part 2: Managing recurrence after endovascular coiling.

Authors:  E Crobeddu; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Aneurysm characteristics, coil packing, and post-coiling hemodynamics affect long-term treatment outcome.

Authors:  Robert J Damiano; Vincent M Tutino; Nikhil Paliwal; Tatsat R Patel; Muhammad Waqas; Elad I Levy; Jason M Davies; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Development and assessment of machine learning algorithms for predicting remission after transsphenoidal surgery among patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Yanghua Fan; Yansheng Li; Yichao Li; Shanshan Feng; Xinjie Bao; Ming Feng; Renzhi Wang
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  Smoking is not associated with recurrence and retreatment of intracranial aneurysms after endovascular coiling.

Authors:  Waleed Brinjikji; Ravi K Lingineni; Chris N Gu; Giuseppe Lanzino; Harry J Cloft; Lauren Ulsh; Kristen Koeller; David F Kallmes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Influence of smoking on aneurysm recurrence after endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms.

Authors:  John Futchko; Jordan Starr; Darryl Lau; Matthew R Leach; Christopher Roark; Aditya S Pandey; B Gregory Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Rahul C Deo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  Role of hemodynamics in initiation/growth of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Mannekomba R Diagbouga; Sandrine Morel; Philippe Bijlenga; Brenda R Kwak
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.686

Review 10.  Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates.

Authors:  Sandra P Ferns; Marieke E S Sprengers; Willem Jan van Rooij; Gabriël J E Rinkel; Jeroen C van Rijn; Shandra Bipat; Menno Sluzewski; Charles B L M Majoie
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.