Literature DB >> 34651481

[Short-term effectiveness of novel computer navigation system assisted total knee arthroplasty].

Qiheng Tang1, Yixin Zhou1, Shengjie Guo1, Wang Deng1, Zhaolun Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term effectiveness of novel computer navigation system (Knee 3 software; Brainlab, Germany) assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: Between July 2020 and December 2020, 19 patients underwent unilateral TKA assisted with Knee 3 software. There were 4 males and 15 females. The mean age was 66.3 years (range, 52-79 years). Eighteen patients were diagnosed with osteoarthritis and 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Sixteen patients had varus knees and 3 patients had valgus knees. Preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain, stiffness, function, and total scores were 12.4±3.4, 2 (1, 4), 22 (18, 29), and 37 (29, 43), respectively. Intraoperatively, the medial and lateral gaps in knee extension and in 90° of knee flexion were recorded. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and complications were recorded. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle, and medial proximal tibial angle were measured to evaluate lower limb alignment and prostheses's alignment using X-ray films at 6 weeks after operation. Patient's satisfaction rate and WOMAC pain, stiffness, function, and total scores were investigated.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients (94.7%) had medial- lateral gap balancing in knee extension, 18 patients (94.7%) had medial-lateral gap balancing in 90° of knee flexion, 19 patients (100%) had medial gap balancing between knee extension and 90° of knee flexion, and 18 patients (94.7%) had lateral gap balancing between knee extension and 90° of knee flexion. The mean operation time was 126 minutes (range, 100-200 minutes). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 205 mL (range, 100-400 mL). Patients were followed up 4-8 months, with an average of 6.2 months. Postoperative complications included 1 deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities and 1 cerebral infarction. X-ray films showed that the mean HKA, lateral distal femoral angle, and medial proximal tibial angle were 179.8° (range, 178°-182°), 83.5° (range, 80°-87°), and 89.5° (range, 87°-93°), respectively. At last follow-up, WOMAC pain, stiffness, function, and total scores were 3.6±1.9, 0 (0, 2), 4 (2, 6), and 9 (5, 10), respectively, which improved when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05). Twelve patients were very satisfied with the operation results and 7 patients were satisfied with the operation results. The overall satisfaction rate was 100%.
CONCLUSION: Knee 3 software can help to obtain good gap balancing and optimal lower limb alignment, with high patient's satisfaction and good short-term effecectiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer navigation system; Knee 3 software; gap balancing; lower limb alignment; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34651481      PMCID: PMC8505941          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202105114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  17 in total

1.  Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  F M Griffin; J N Insall; G R Scuderi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  J Bohannon Mason; Thomas K Fehring; Rhonda Estok; Deirdre Banel; Kyle Fahrbach
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  A Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Computer-Navigated and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Seung Joon Rhee; Hyun-Jung Kim; Chang-Rack Lee; Chang-Wan Kim; Heui-Chul Gwak; Jung-Han Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Pin Site Complications Associated With Computer-Assisted Navigation in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eli Kamara; Zachary P Berliner; Matthew S Hepinstall; H John Cooper
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Assessment of a Satisfaction Measure for Use After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Susan M Goodman; Bella Y Mehta; Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Ethan C Krell; Joseph Nguyen; Jackie Finik; Mark P Figgie; Michael L Parks; Douglas E Padgett; Vinicius C Antao; Adolph J Yates; Bryan D Springer; Steven L Lyman; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Patients' Preoperative Expectations of Total Knee Arthroplasty and Satisfaction With Outcomes at One Year: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Barbara L Conner-Spady; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; C Allyson Jones; Bheeshma Ravi; Tom Noseworthy; Donald Dick; James Powell; Paulose Paul; Deborah A Marshall
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 10.995

8.  Patient satisfaction after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a functional specific analysis.

Authors:  Hui Du; Hao Tang; Jian-Ming Gu; Yi-Xin Zhou
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cynthia A Kahlenberg; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Alexander S McLawhorn; Michael B Cross; Charles N Cornell; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-06-05

10.  A new method to measure ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: laxity measurements in 100 knees.

Authors:  Eirik Aunan; Thomas Kibsgård; John Clarke-Jenssen; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.