Literature DB >> 34651478

[Biomechanical analysis of sitting-up movement of knee joint after robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Gang Du1,2, Zhengtian Li1, Shan Lao1, Ken Urish2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of Navio robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) on the biomechanics of knee joint during sitting-up movement, and to determine whether UKA can maintain the biomechanical characteristics of knee joint.
METHODS: The clinical data of 8 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis treated with medial fixed platform of Navio robot-assisted UKA between January 2018 and January 2019 and had the complete follow-up data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 4 males and 4 females; the age ranged from 58 to 67 years, with an average of 62.3 years. The disease duration was 6-18 months, with an average of 13 months. The varus deformity ranged from 4° to 6°, with an average of 5°; the knee flexion range of motion was 0°-130°, with an average of 110°. All patients had no extension limitation. The imaging data of bilateral knees during sitting-up movement were collected by biplane C-arm X-ray machine at 3 weeks before operation and 7 months after operation. The three-dimensional models of femur and tibia were established by dual-energy CT scanning, and the three-dimensional models of femur and tibia were matched and synchronized with the femur and tibia in X-ray film by automatic matching tracer software. The biomechanical parameters of femur and tibia were measured, including internal rotation/external rotation, varus/valgus, forward/backward displacement of medial and lateral tibia contact center, and lateral compartment joint space.
RESULTS: Eight patients were followed up 5-7 months, with an average of 6.4 months. In the comparison of the affected side before and after operation, except for the difference of varus/valgus which was significant ( t=4.959, P=0.002), the differences in other indicators was not significant ( P>0.05). There were significant differences in varus/valgus and internal rotation/external rotation between healthy and affected sides at 3 weeks before operation ( P<0.05), and the differences in other indicators was not significant ( P>0.05). At 7 months after operation, the difference in the forward and backward displacement of medial tibia contact center was significant ( t=3.798, P=0.007), and the differences in other indicators was not significant ( P>0.05).
CONCLUSION: UKA can effectively correct the varus and valgus of the knee joint, and restore the rotational biomechanical characteristics of the affected knee joint. It does not affect the establishment of the lateral compartment joint space, but the medial and lateral tibia contact center still changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Navio robot; Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty; biomechanics; lower limb alignment; rotation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34651478      PMCID: PMC8505930          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202101061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  11 in total

Review 1.  Robotically Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty with a Handheld Image-Free Sculpting Tool.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Comparing different approaches in robotic-assisted surgery for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcomes at a short-term follow-up of MAKO versus NAVIO system.

Authors:  P Porcelli; A Marmotti; E Bellato; D Colombero; G Ferrero; G Agati; M Calò; C Ferraris; A Pautasso; F Castoldi
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.711

3.  Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.

Authors:  J Cobb; J Henckel; P Gomes; S Harris; M Jakopec; F Rodriguez; A Barrett; B Davies
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

4.  Robotic Technology Produces More Conservative Tibial Resection Than Conventional Techniques in UKA.

Authors:  Danielle Y Ponzio; Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec

Review 5.  Robotic-assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Options and Outcomes.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Mitchell R Klement
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Stuart W Bell; Iain Anthony; Bryn Jones; Angus MacLean; Philip Rowe; Mark Blyth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Native rotational knee kinematics is restored after lateral UKA but not after medial UKA.

Authors:  Keizo Wada; Daisuke Hamada; Tomoya Takasago; Akihiro Nitta; Tomohiro Goto; Ichiro Tonogai; Yoshihiro Tsuruo; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Medial Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: The First 10-Year US Multi-Center Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Omar K Alnachoukati; John W Barrington; Keith R Berend; Michael C Kolczun; Roger H Emerson; Adolph V Lombardi; David R Mauerhan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The results of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States: a mean ten-year survival analysis.

Authors:  R H Emerson; O Alnachoukati; J Barrington; K Ennin
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Comparison between standard technique and image-free robotic technique in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Preliminary data.

Authors:  Paolo Di Benedetto; Michele Mario Buttironi; Stefano Magnanelli; Vanni Cainero; Araldo Causero
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2019-12-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  [LLMKA: A Matlab-based toolbox for musculoskeletal kinematics analysis of lower limbs].

Authors:  Shiqi Li; Yong Nie; Junqing Wang; Kang Li; Bin Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-05-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.