Literature DB >> 28005115

Robotic Technology Produces More Conservative Tibial Resection Than Conventional Techniques in UKA.

Danielle Y Ponzio, Jess H Lonner1.   

Abstract

Conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be relatively simple when tibial resection is conservative during the index UKA. However, with greater tibial resection, conversion to TKA may be complicated by osseous insufficiency, requiring stems and augments, and potentially compromising patient outcomes and TKA durability. Robotic assistance in UKA is shown to enhance the bone preparation accuracy. In our retrospective comparison of polyethylene insert sizes, 8-mm or 9-mm polyethylene inserts were used in 93.6% and 84.5% of robotic (N = 8421) and conventional (N = 27,989) UKAs, respectively. Aggressive tibial resection, requiring tibial inserts ≥10 mm, was performed in 6.4% of robotic-assisted cases and 15.5% of conventional cases. Robotic-assisted UKA more reproducibly achieved accurate and precise conservative resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28005115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  8 in total

1.  [Biomechanical analysis of sitting-up movement of knee joint after robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Gang Du; Zhengtian Li; Shan Lao; Ken Urish
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 2.  Robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty: The latest developments.

Authors:  Xin Chen; Shu Deng; Mao-Lin Sun; Rui He
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2021-09-02

3.  The Use of Computerized Tomography Scans in Elective Knee and Hip Arthroplasty-What Do They Tell Us and at What Risk?

Authors:  Taylor D'Amore; Gregg Klein; Jess Lonner
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-05

Review 4.  Component placement accuracy in two generations of handheld robotics-assisted knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chelsea S Sicat; James C Chow; Bertrand Kaper; Riddhit Mitra; Jing Xie; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty (RAKA): The Technique, the Technology and the Transition.

Authors:  Vaibhav Bagaria; Omkar S Sadigale; Prashant P Pawar; Ravi K Bashyal; Ajinkya Achalare; Murali Poduval
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 6.  Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Pei Liu; Fei-Fan Lu; Guo-Jie Liu; Xiao-Hong Mu; Yong-Qiang Sun; Qi-Dong Zhang; Wei-Guo Wang; Wan-Shou Guo
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-05-02

7.  Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations.

Authors:  Meredith P Crizer; Amer Haffar; Andrew Battenberg; Mikayla McGrath; Ryan Sutton; Jess H Lonner
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-07-14

8.  Robotic-arm assisted medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty versus jig-based unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with navigation control: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Jenni Tahmassebi; Atif Ayuob; Peter D Moriarty; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.