Cheng Wang1, Xiaochun Xu1, Margaret Folaron1, Jason R Gunn1, Sassan Hodge2, Eunice Y Chen2,3, P Jack Hoopes1,2,3, Kenneth M Tichauer4, Kimberley S Samkoe5,6,7. 1. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. 2. Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. 3. Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. 4. Biomedical Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Kimberley.S.Samkoe@dartmouth.edu. 6. Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA. Kimberley.S.Samkoe@dartmouth.edu. 7. Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Kimberley.S.Samkoe@dartmouth.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal of fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) in oncology is to improve the surgical therapeutic index by enhancing contrast between cancerous and healthy tissues. However, optimal discrimination between these tissues is complicated by the nonspecific uptake and retention of molecular targeted agents and the variance of fluorescence signal. Paired-agent imaging (PAI) employs co-administration of an untargeted imaging agent with a molecular targeted agent, providing a normalization factor to minimize nonspecific and varied signals. The resulting measured binding potential is quantitative and equivalent to in vivo immunohistochemistry of the target protein. This study demonstrates that PAI improves the accuracy of tumor-to-healthy tissue discrimination compared to single-agent imaging for in vivo FGS. PROCEDURES: PAI using a fluorescent anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) affibody molecule (ABY-029, eIND 122,681) with untargeted IRDye 700DX carboxylate was compared to ABY-029 alone in an oral squamous cell carcinoma xenograft mouse model at 3 h after dye administration (n = 30). RESULTS: PAI significantly enhanced tumor discrimination, as compared to ABY-029 alone in low EGFR-expressing tumors and highly heterogeneous populations including multiple cell lines with varying expression (diagnostic accuracy: 0.908 vs. 0.854 and 0.908 vs. 0.822; and ROC curve AUC: 0.963 vs. 0.909 and 0.957 vs. 0.909, respectively) indicating a potential for universal FGS image thresholds to determine surgical margins. In addition, PAI achieved significantly higher diagnostic ability than ABY-029 alone 0.25-5-h post injection and exhibited a stronger correlation to EGFR expression heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The quantitative receptor delineation of PAI promises to improve the surgical therapeutic index of cancer resection in a clinically relevant timeline.
PURPOSE: The goal of fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) in oncology is to improve the surgical therapeutic index by enhancing contrast between cancerous and healthy tissues. However, optimal discrimination between these tissues is complicated by the nonspecific uptake and retention of molecular targeted agents and the variance of fluorescence signal. Paired-agent imaging (PAI) employs co-administration of an untargeted imaging agent with a molecular targeted agent, providing a normalization factor to minimize nonspecific and varied signals. The resulting measured binding potential is quantitative and equivalent to in vivo immunohistochemistry of the target protein. This study demonstrates that PAI improves the accuracy of tumor-to-healthy tissue discrimination compared to single-agent imaging for in vivo FGS. PROCEDURES: PAI using a fluorescent anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) affibody molecule (ABY-029, eIND 122,681) with untargeted IRDye 700DX carboxylate was compared to ABY-029 alone in an oral squamous cell carcinoma xenograft mouse model at 3 h after dye administration (n = 30). RESULTS: PAI significantly enhanced tumor discrimination, as compared to ABY-029 alone in low EGFR-expressing tumors and highly heterogeneous populations including multiple cell lines with varying expression (diagnostic accuracy: 0.908 vs. 0.854 and 0.908 vs. 0.822; and ROC curve AUC: 0.963 vs. 0.909 and 0.957 vs. 0.909, respectively) indicating a potential for universal FGS image thresholds to determine surgical margins. In addition, PAI achieved significantly higher diagnostic ability than ABY-029 alone 0.25-5-h post injection and exhibited a stronger correlation to EGFR expression heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The quantitative receptor delineation of PAI promises to improve the surgical therapeutic index of cancer resection in a clinically relevant timeline.
Authors: Kimberley S Samkoe; Kenneth M Tichauer; Jason R Gunn; Wendy A Wells; Tayyaba Hasan; Brian W Pogue Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Matthijs D Linssen; Eva J Ter Weele; Derk P Allersma; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Gooitzen M van Dam; Annelies Jorritsma-Smit; Wouter B Nagengast Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Kimberley S Samkoe; Jason R Gunn; Kayla Marra; Sally M Hull; Karen L Moodie; Joachim Feldwisch; Theresa V Strong; Daniel R Draney; P Jack Hoopes; David W Roberts; Keith Paulsen; Brian W Pogue Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Lindsay S Moore; Eben L Rosenthal; Esther de Boer; Andrew C Prince; Neel Patel; Joshua M Richman; Anthony B Morlandt; William R Carroll; Kurt R Zinn; Jason M Warram Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Kimberley S Samkoe; Hira S Sardar; Brent D Bates; Niki N Tselepidakis; Jason R Gunn; Kevin A Hoffer-Hawlik; Joachim Feldwisch; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Eric R Henderson Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Ryan Zeh; Saad Sheikh; Leilei Xia; John Pierce; Andrew Newton; Jarrod Predina; Steve Cho; MacLean Nasrallah; Sunil Singhal; Jay Dorsey; John Y K Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 3.240