Lindsay S Moore1, Eben L Rosenthal2, Esther de Boer1,3, Andrew C Prince1, Neel Patel1, Joshua M Richman4, Anthony B Morlandt5, William R Carroll1, Kurt R Zinn6, Jason M Warram7,8,9. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 5. Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 7. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. mojack@uab.edu. 8. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. mojack@uab.edu. 9. Departments of Otolaryngology, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. mojack@uab.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intraoperative optical imaging to guide surgeons during oncologic resections offers a unique and promising solution to the ambiguity of cancer margins to tactile and visual assessment that results in devastatingly high rates of positive margins. Sequestering of labeled antibodies by normal tissues with high expression of the antibody target, or "antigen sinks", diminishes the efficacy of these probes to provide contrast between the tumor and background tissues by decreasing the amount of circulating probe available for uptake by the tumor and by increasing the fluorescence of non-tumor tissues. We hypothesized that administering a dose of unlabeled antibody prior to infusion of the near-infrared (NIR) fluorescently labeled antibody would improve tumor-specific uptake and contrast of the fluorescently labeled probe by occupying extra-tumoral binding sites, thereby increasing the amount of labeled probe available for uptake by the tumor. PROCEDURES: In this study, we explore this concept by testing two different "pre-load" doses of unlabeled cetuximab (the standard 10-mg test dose, and a larger, experimental 100-mg test dose) in six patients receiving cetuximab conjugated to the fluorescent dye IRDye800CW (cetuximab-IRDye800CW) in a clinical trial, and compared the amount of fluorescent antibody in tumor and background tissues, as well as the tumor-specific contrast of each. RESULTS: The patients receiving the larger preload (100 mg) of unlabeled cetuximab demonstrated significantly higher concentrations (9.5 vs. 0.1 μg) and a longer half-life (30.3 vs. 20.6 days) of the labeled cetuximab in plasma, as well as significantly greater tumor fluorescence (32.3 vs. 9.3 relative fluorescence units) and tumor to background ratios (TBRs) (5.5 vs. 1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Administering a preload of unlabeled antibody prior to infusion of the fluorescently labeled drug may be a simple and effective way to improve the performance of antibody-based probes to guide surgical resection of solid malignancies.
PURPOSE: Intraoperative optical imaging to guide surgeons during oncologic resections offers a unique and promising solution to the ambiguity of cancer margins to tactile and visual assessment that results in devastatingly high rates of positive margins. Sequestering of labeled antibodies by normal tissues with high expression of the antibody target, or "antigen sinks", diminishes the efficacy of these probes to provide contrast between the tumor and background tissues by decreasing the amount of circulating probe available for uptake by the tumor and by increasing the fluorescence of non-tumor tissues. We hypothesized that administering a dose of unlabeled antibody prior to infusion of the near-infrared (NIR) fluorescently labeled antibody would improve tumor-specific uptake and contrast of the fluorescently labeled probe by occupying extra-tumoral binding sites, thereby increasing the amount of labeled probe available for uptake by the tumor. PROCEDURES: In this study, we explore this concept by testing two different "pre-load" doses of unlabeled cetuximab (the standard 10-mg test dose, and a larger, experimental 100-mg test dose) in six patients receiving cetuximab conjugated to the fluorescent dye IRDye800CW (cetuximab-IRDye800CW) in a clinical trial, and compared the amount of fluorescent antibody in tumor and background tissues, as well as the tumor-specific contrast of each. RESULTS: The patients receiving the larger preload (100 mg) of unlabeled cetuximab demonstrated significantly higher concentrations (9.5 vs. 0.1 μg) and a longer half-life (30.3 vs. 20.6 days) of the labeled cetuximab in plasma, as well as significantly greater tumor fluorescence (32.3 vs. 9.3 relative fluorescence units) and tumor to background ratios (TBRs) (5.5 vs. 1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Administering a preload of unlabeled antibody prior to infusion of the fluorescently labeled drug may be a simple and effective way to improve the performance of antibody-based probes to guide surgical resection of solid malignancies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cetuximab; Cetuximab-IRDye800CW; Fluorescence-guided surgery; Head and neck cancer; Loading dose; Optical surgical navigation; Unlabeled preload
Authors: Joost R van der Vorst; Boudewijn E Schaafsma; Floris P R Verbeek; Stijn Keereweer; Jeroen C Jansen; Lilly-Ann van der Velden; Antonius P M Langeveld; Merlijn Hutteman; Clemens W G M Löwik; Cornelis J H van de Velde; John V Frangioni; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Kristine E Day; Lauren N Beck; Nicholas L Deep; Joy Kovar; Kurt R Zinn; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Melissa L Korb; Yolanda E Hartman; Joy Kovar; Kurt R Zinn; Kirby I Bland; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Melodi Javid Whitley; Diana M Cardona; Alexander L Lazarides; Ivan Spasojevic; Jorge M Ferrer; Joan Cahill; Chang-Lung Lee; Matija Snuderl; Dan G Blazer; E Shelley Hwang; Rachel A Greenup; Paul J Mosca; Jeffrey K Mito; Kyle C Cuneo; Nicole A Larrier; Erin K O'Reilly; Richard F Riedel; William C Eward; David B Strasfeld; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain; W David Lee; Linda G Griffith; Moungi G Bawendi; David G Kirsch; Brian E Brigman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Eiichi Tanaka; Hak Soo Choi; Valerie Humblet; Shunsuke Ohnishi; Rita G Laurence; John V Frangioni Journal: Surgery Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Kimberley S Samkoe; Brent D Bates; Niki N Tselepidakis; Alisha V DSouza; Jason R Gunn; Dipak B Ramkumar; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue; Eric R Henderson Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Willemieke S Tummers; Sarah E Miller; Nutte T Teraphongphom; Adam Gomez; Idan Steinberg; David M Huland; Steve Hong; Sri-Rajasekhar Kothapalli; Alifia Hasan; Robert Ertsey; Bert A Bonsing; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Teri A Longacre; George A Fisher; Sanjiv S Gambhir; George A Poultsides; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Ana Luiza Ribeiro de Souza; Kayla Marra; Jason Gunn; Kimberley S Samkoe; Sally Hull; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue Journal: Photochem Photobiol Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 3.421
Authors: Kimberley S Samkoe; Hira Shahzad Sardar; Jason Gunn; Joachim Feldwisch; Konstantinos Linos; Eric Henderson; Brian Pogue; Keith Paulsen Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2019-05-22
Authors: Kimberley S Samkoe; Hira S Sardar; Brent D Bates; Niki N Tselepidakis; Jason R Gunn; Kevin A Hoffer-Hawlik; Joachim Feldwisch; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Eric R Henderson Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Rebecca W Gao; Nutte T Teraphongphom; Nynke S van den Berg; Brock A Martin; Nicholas J Oberhelman; Vasu Divi; Michael J Kaplan; Steven S Hong; Guolan Lu; Robert Ertsey; Willemieke S F J Tummers; Adam J Gomez; F Christopher Holsinger; Christina S Kong; Alexander D Colevas; Jason M Warram; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 12.701