| Literature DB >> 34650063 |
Silver Heinsar1,2,3,4, Jae-Seung Jung1,2,5, Sebastiano Maria Colombo1,2,6, Sacha Rozencwajg1,7, Karin Wildi1,2, Kei Sato1,2, Carmen Ainola1,2,4, Xiaomeng Wang1, Gabriella Abbate1, Noriko Sato1, Wayne Bruce Dyer8,9, Samantha Annie Livingstone1,2, Leticia Pretti Pimenta1, Nicole Bartnikowski1,10, Mahe Jeannine Patricia Bouquet1,2, Margaret Passmore1,2, Bruno Vidal1, Chiara Palmieri11, Janice D Reid1,2, Haris M Haqqani2, Daniel McGuire1, Emily Susan Wilson1,2, Indrek Rätsep4, Roberto Lorusso12, Jacky Y Suen1,2, Gianluigi Li Bassi13,14,15,16,17, John F Fraser18,19,20,21.
Abstract
Refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) often requires veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) to sustain end-organ perfusion. Current animal models result in heterogenous cardiac injury and frequent episodes of refractory ventricular fibrillation. Thus, we aimed to develop an innovative, clinically relevant, and titratable model of severe cardiopulmonary failure. Six sheep (60 ± 6 kg) were anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated. VA-ECMO was commenced and CS was induced through intramyocardial injections of ethanol. Then, hypoxemic/hypercapnic pulmonary failure was achieved, through substantial decrease in ventilatory support. Echocardiography was used to compute left ventricular fractional area change (LVFAC) and cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) was quantified. After 5 h, the animals were euthanised and the heart was retrieved for histological evaluations. Ethanol (58 ± 23 mL) successfully induced CS in all animals. cTnI levels increased near 5000-fold. CS was confirmed by a drop in systolic blood pressure to 67 ± 14 mmHg, while lactate increased to 4.7 ± 0.9 mmol/L and LVFAC decreased to 16 ± 7%. Myocardial samples corroborated extensive cellular necrosis and inflammatory infiltrates. In conclusion, we present an innovative ovine model of severe cardiopulmonary failure in animals on VA-ECMO. This model could be essential to further characterize CS and develop future treatments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34650063 PMCID: PMC8516938 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00087-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Heart failure induction protocol. Ethanol was injected sequentially with numbers indicating the order of injections (intracoronary injections were avoided). Visual echocardiography was performed to assess the severity of myocardial dysfunction.
Figure 2Experimental timeline. Approximate length of the experiment was 12 h. CS cardiogenic shock, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Histopathological scoring system with left-ventricular (primary lesion) and right ventricular (end-organ) tissue injury score.
| Organ | Histological feature (magnification) | Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Mean score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heart | Contraction band necrosis (40×) | None | Single focus | Multiple foci | 0.74 ± 0.32 |
| Neutrophilic infiltration (40×) | None | < 20 neutrophils | > 20 neutrophils | 0.94 ± 0.34 | |
| Intramuscular haemorrhage (20×) | None | < 50% affected | > 50% affected | 0.94 ± 0.50 | |
| Oedema (interstitial or perivascular) (20×) | None | < 50% affected | > 50% affected | 0.5 ± 0.14 | |
| Myocytolysis, necrosis (20×) | Not present or single cell | Groups of cells, focal | Groups of cells, several foci | 1.16 ± 0.09 | |
Heart | Contraction band necrosis (40×) | None | Single focus | Multiple foci | 0.28 ± 0.24 |
| Neutrophilic infiltration (40×) | None | < 20 neutrophils | > 20 neutrophils | 0.25 ± 0.14 | |
| Intramuscular haemorrhage (20×) | None | < 50% affected | > 50% affected | 0.22 ± 0.30 | |
| Oedema (interstitial or perivascular) (20×) | None | < 50% affected | > 50% affected | 0.1 ± 0.13 | |
| Myocytolysis, necrosis (20×) | Not present or single cell | Groups of cells, focal | Groups of cells, several foci | 0.36 ± 0.10 |
Haemodynamic parameters and cardiac assessment pre- and post-induction of cardiogenic shock.
| Baseline | CS | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate (BPM) | 85 ± 18 | 99 ± 17 | 0.06 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 80 ± 18 | 56 ± 11 | 0.03 |
| COa (L/min) | 4.1 ± 0.8 | – | – |
| SVa (mL) | 46 ± 13 | – | – |
| SVRIa (dynes/cm5/m2) | 1697 ± 646 | – | – |
| Fractional area change (%) | 34 ± 9 | 16 ± 7 | 0.003 |
| – | |||
Parameters in bold are part of the definition of CS according to the latest guidelines[1]. Data presented as mean ± SD.
BPM beats per minute, CO cardiac output, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, MAP mean arterial pressure, SAP systolic arterial blood pressure, SV stroke volume, SVRI systemic vascular resistance index.
aCO, SV and SVRI were not measured after commencement of VA-ECMO due to inappropriateness of Swan-Ganz measurements during ECMO.
Figure 3Appraisal of cardiac injury. (A) Plasma levels of cardiac Troponin I increased significantly over time from ECMO to 5 h. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, n = 6. (B) Macroscopic images of short-axis base, mid and apical sections of the ovine heart obtained after 5 h of follow-up post-cardiogenic shock and acute respiratory failure induction. ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ET end of instrumentation.
Figure 4Echocardiographic assessment. (A) Left ventricular end-diastolic areas throughout the experiment. There was a statistically significant increase in the end-diastolic area after cardiogenic shock was induced and full-support ECMO was initiated. (B) Left ventricular end-systolic areas increased similarly after full-support with ECMO was commenced. (C) Global radial strain decreased significantly from 35 to 10% after cardiogenic shock was induced. (D) Global circumferential strain showed a decrease to a lesser degree from − 18 to − 9% after shock was induced. ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ET end of instrumentation.
Figure 5Representative H&E-stained tissue sections demonstrating primary lesions with end-organ injury associated with cardiogenic shock. (A) Left ventricle of the heart (×20 magnification), showing necrotic lesions (right arrow), oedema (top left arrow) and inflammatory infiltrates (bottom left arrow). (B) Right ventricle of the heart (×40 magnification), showing contraction band necrosis with thick and intensely eosinophilic staining contraction bands (circles).
Figure 6Overview of left and right ventricular cardiac electroanatomic substrate mapping. (A) Attenuated bipolar electrograms from the LV endocardium. (B) Endocardial biventricular substrate maps in the left lateral projection. (C) Endocardial biventricular substrate maps in the LAO projection. B and C show patchy zones of bipolar voltage attenuation with areas in red corresponding to dense scar (voltage < 1.5 mV). (D) Significant endocardial LV unipolar voltage attenuation in the LAO projection. (E) Abnormal low voltage epicardial. (F) LAO caudal projection of an epicardial substrate map showing relative epicardial bipolar voltage preservation. LV left ventricle, LAO left anterior oblique, RAO right anterior oblique, AP anteroposterior.