BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) reducing ischaemic complications and the development of heart failure, thus potentially changing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) requirements. Little information exists about patients with ACS requiring IMV in the current era. We aimed to analyze IMV requirements and characteristics of ACS patients treated under current recommendations (including a high rate of PCI). METHODS: Baseline characteristics, indications for IMV, management and in-hospital and mid-term clinical course were analyzed prospectively in a consecutive series of patients with ACS admitted to a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: We included 1821 patients, of which 106 (5.8%) required IMV. Mean follow-up was 347 days. PCI was performed in 84% of cases. Patients with IMV had more comorbidities, worse left ventricular function and more unstable hemodynamic parameters on admission. In-hospital mortality in patients requiring IMV was 29%. These patients also had higher mid-term mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 6.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.49-9.64; p 0.001). The most common indication for IMV was cardiopulmonary arrest (CA) (65; 61%), followed by pulmonary oedema (27; 26%) and shock (14; 13.2%). Patients with CA were younger, with better hemodynamic parameters at admission, more favourable coronary anatomy and higher rates of PCI. There were no significant differences in overall mortality between the three groups. The main cause of death in CA patients was persistent vegetative state. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in patients with ACS requiring IMV remained high despite a high rate of PCI. Baseline characteristics, management and clinical course were different according to the reason for IMV. The most common cause for IMV requirement was CA.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) reducing ischaemic complications and the development of heart failure, thus potentially changing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) requirements. Little information exists about patients with ACS requiring IMV in the current era. We aimed to analyze IMV requirements and characteristics of ACS patients treated under current recommendations (including a high rate of PCI). METHODS: Baseline characteristics, indications for IMV, management and in-hospital and mid-term clinical course were analyzed prospectively in a consecutive series of patients with ACS admitted to a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: We included 1821 patients, of which 106 (5.8%) required IMV. Mean follow-up was 347 days. PCI was performed in 84% of cases. Patients with IMV had more comorbidities, worse left ventricular function and more unstable hemodynamic parameters on admission. In-hospital mortality in patients requiring IMV was 29%. These patients also had higher mid-term mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 6.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.49-9.64; p 0.001). The most common indication for IMV was cardiopulmonary arrest (CA) (65; 61%), followed by pulmonary oedema (27; 26%) and shock (14; 13.2%). Patients with CA were younger, with better hemodynamic parameters at admission, more favourable coronary anatomy and higher rates of PCI. There were no significant differences in overall mortality between the three groups. The main cause of death in CA patients was persistent vegetative state. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in patients with ACS requiring IMV remained high despite a high rate of PCI. Baseline characteristics, management and clinical course were different according to the reason for IMV. The most common cause for IMV requirement was CA.
Authors: J G Canto; N R Every; D J Magid; W J Rogers; J A Malmgren; P D Frederick; W J French; A J Tiefenbrunn; V K Misra; C I Kiefe; H V Barron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-05-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J H Chesebro; G Knatterud; R Roberts; J Borer; L S Cohen; J Dalen; H T Dodge; C K Francis; D Hillis; P Ludbrook Journal: Circulation Date: 1987-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J B López Messa; J M Andrés De Llano; C A Berrocal De La Fuente; R Pascual Palacín Journal: Rev Esp Cardiol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 4.753
Authors: Anne Lesage; Michel Ramakers; Cédric Daubin; Virginie Verrier; Dominique Beynier; Pierre Charbonneau; Damien du Cheyron Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Philippe Gabriel Steg; Omar H Dabbous; Laurent J Feldman; Alain Cohen-Solal; Marie-Claude Aumont; José López-Sendón; Andrzej Budaj; Robert J Goldberg; Werner Klein; Frederick A Anderson Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-01-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Silver Heinsar; Jae-Seung Jung; Sebastiano Maria Colombo; Sacha Rozencwajg; Karin Wildi; Kei Sato; Carmen Ainola; Xiaomeng Wang; Gabriella Abbate; Noriko Sato; Wayne Bruce Dyer; Samantha Annie Livingstone; Leticia Pretti Pimenta; Nicole Bartnikowski; Mahe Jeannine Patricia Bouquet; Margaret Passmore; Bruno Vidal; Chiara Palmieri; Janice D Reid; Haris M Haqqani; Daniel McGuire; Emily Susan Wilson; Indrek Rätsep; Roberto Lorusso; Jacky Y Suen; Gianluigi Li Bassi; John F Fraser Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 4.379