Literature DB >> 32513218

How I approach weaning from venoarterial ECMO.

Justin A Fried1, Amirali Masoumi2, Koji Takeda3, Daniel Brodie4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock ECMO; ECLS; ECMO weaning; Extracorporeal life support; VA-ECMO weaning; Venoarterial ECMO weaning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32513218      PMCID: PMC7278069          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03010-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a temporary mechanical circulatory support device capable of providing robust cardiopulmonary support for days to weeks, most commonly in the setting of refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest as a bridge to recovery or heart replacement therapies (HRT, e.g., durable left ventricular assist device or cardiac transplantation) [1]. Given the complications associated with prolonged use of VA-ECMO, it is imperative to institute systematic weaning strategies. In this article, we review our standardized approach to VA-ECMO weaning in adult patients.

Considerations prior to weaning

VA-ECMO supports circulation while treatment of the underlying pathology is prioritized to facilitate successful weaning or bridge to HRT. Because the potential for ventricular recovery is often difficult to ascertain, we advocate that all patients where HRT is a realistic consideration undergo early evaluation even if the intended goal is recovery [2-5]. Our center favors the use of invasive hemodynamics whenever possible to guide therapy in VA-ECMO. A pulmonary artery catheter provides valuable information about left ventricular (LV) loading conditions [6]. A right upper extremity arterial line should be maintained in all patients with femoral cannulation to facilitate monitoring of pulsatility and oxygenated blood flow to the arch of the aorta [7]. We generally target a cardiac index > 2.2 L/min/m2, mean arterial pressure (MAP) 65–80 mmHg, central venous pressure 8–12 mmHg, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure < 18 mmHg. Arterial blood gas (ABG), lactate, hepatic, and renal function are followed in serial laboratory measurements to assess adequacy of end-organ perfusion. In the event of concomitant use of a LV venting device [intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD)], it is our approach to prioritize weaning and removing VA-ECMO first, given its propensity to increase afterload on a failing myocardium and relatively high complication rate [8]. One exception is when complications arise directly related to the ancillary device necessitating its removal. When used as a LV venting device, we maintain the IABP at 1:1 for unloading and ensuring adequate washing of the aortic root. Concomitant pLVADs, which in our institution is most often an Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA), are generally maintained at relatively low levels of flow (1.5–2 LPM) as its primary use in this setting is LV decompression rather than circulatory support [8-10]. Prior to weaning VA-ECMO flow, we wean vasoactive medications to low levels, given the deleterious effects associated with these medications, including arrythmia, renal injury, and limb ischemia. The following criteria should be met prior to weaning VA-ECMO: first, the patient phenotype is compatible with recovery; second, end-organ function is recovering; third, Pa02/Fi02 > 100; and fourth, vasopressors and inotropes are at reasonably low levels (for instance norepinephrine ≤ 4 μg/min or dobutamine < 5 mcg/kg/min). When these criteria are met, we initiate a 3-part approach to weaning that includes the following: (1) daily weaning study, (2) bedside assessment for decannulation, and (3) final assessment (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

VA-ECMO weaning process. *Criteria required to initiate weaning trial: (1) Phenotype is compatible with recovery (2) End-organ function is improving (3) Pa02/Fi02 > 100 (4) Vasopressors and intropes at low levels (norepinephrine ≤ 4 μg/min, dobutamine < 5 mcg/kg/min) **Any of the following criteria constitutes failure of a weaning trial: (1) MAP falls below 65–70 mmHg or decreases by more than 10 mmHg from baseline (2) Significant increase in intracardiac filling pressures (3) Deterioration in respiratory status

VA-ECMO weaning process. *Criteria required to initiate weaning trial: (1) Phenotype is compatible with recovery (2) End-organ function is improving (3) Pa02/Fi02 > 100 (4) Vasopressors and intropes at low levels (norepinephrine ≤ 4 μg/min, dobutamine < 5 mcg/kg/min) **Any of the following criteria constitutes failure of a weaning trial: (1) MAP falls below 65–70 mmHg or decreases by more than 10 mmHg from baseline (2) Significant increase in intracardiac filling pressures (3) Deterioration in respiratory status

Daily weaning study

We perform daily transient reductions in ECMO flow rate in all patients to assess suitability for weaning, analogous to the strategy of daily spontaneous breathing trials in mechanically ventilated patients. We reduce flow rates in increments of 0.5 LPM. At each incremental drop in blood flow to a minimum of 2 LPM, we wait approximately 1 min to assess the effect on MAP and intracardiac pressures. If the MAP falls more than 10–15 mmHg or below 65 mmHg, the patient is not yet ready to wean to that level. Significant increases in right-sided filling pressures during weaning may also constitute failure especially in the setting of predominant right ventricular failure. At the end of the study, the blood flow rate is set at the lowest level achieved in the weaning study required to maintain stable MAP and intracardiac pressures. ABG, lactate, and a full set of invasive hemodynamics are obtained at this new flow rate to detect any impact on hemodynamics, tissue perfusion, or respiratory status [7]. Because a subset of patients who tolerate reduced support transiently are unable to tolerate the decreased support over a prolonged duration, lower flow rates are maintained for a minimum of 8 h prior to further weaning attempts. Weaning trials are performed at least every 24 h. Bedside echocardiography is used to provide additional information about native cardiac function as blood flow rates are reduced, particularly if the patient has failed prior weaning attempts. Prior literature has suggested the following parameters to be associated with successful weaning: aortic VTI ≥ 10 cm, LVEF > 20–25%, and lateral mitral annulus peak systolic velocity > 6 cm/s [11].

Bedside assessment for decannulation

After a patient has tolerated a trial of 2 LPM for a minimum of 8 h with stable end-organ function, a bedside assessment for decannulation is performed. Flow is gradually decreased to 1 LPM over the course of approximately 1 min to detect hemodynamic instability with minimal ECMO support. If tolerated, blood flow is then returned to 2 LPM, and plans are made for decannulation if the underlying cause of initial decompensation has been sufficiently addressed such that liberation from VA-ECMO is possible. If the patient fails the bedside assessment, then flow is returned to 2 LPM with plans to reassess every 24 h.

Final assessment

When a patient has tolerated a trial of 2 LPM of blood flow for a minimum of 8 h with stable hemodynamics and end-organ function and tolerates transient flow reduction to 1 LPM at the bedside, the patient is typically taken to the operating room for ECMO decannulation. The final assessment is performed at this time, wherein blood flows are gradually decreased and the cannulae are clamped; hemodynamic and ABG parameters are checked. Focused echocardiography is often undertaken to assess the impact of flow reduction on biventricular function. If acceptable, decannulation is performed.

Conclusion

Weaning from VA-ECMO remains a challenging but critically important step in device management. The key is to balance minimizing complications associated with device support with the potential for hemodynamic deterioration if support is prematurely discontinued. We advocate for a standardized and systematic approach to weaning but also recognize that deviation from the above approach may be required in specific clinical scenarios.
  11 in total

1.  EC-VAD: Combined Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Percutaneous Microaxial Pump Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Olutosin J Akanni; Koji Takeda; Lauren K Truby; Paul A Kurlansky; Codruta Chiuzan; Jiho Han; Veli K Topkara; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Paolo C Colombo; Dimitrios Karmpaliotis; Jeffery W Moses; Yoshifumi Naka; A Reshad Garan; Ajay J Kirtane; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 2.  Left ventricular distension and venting strategies for patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Marisa Cevasco; Hiroo Takayama; Masahiko Ando; Arthur R Garan; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Venoarterial ECMO for Adults: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Maya Guglin; Mark J Zucker; Vanessa M Bazan; Biykem Bozkurt; Aly El Banayosy; Jerry D Estep; John Gurley; Karl Nelson; Rajasekhar Malyala; Gurusher S Panjrath; Joseph B Zwischenberger; Sean P Pinney
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Incidence and Implications of Left Ventricular Distention During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

Authors:  Lauren K Truby; Koji Takeda; Christine Mauro; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Arthur R Garan; Ajay J Kirtane; Veli K Topkara; Darryl Abrams; Daniel Brodie; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

5.  Predicting survival after ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock: the survival after veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE)-score.

Authors:  Matthieu Schmidt; Aidan Burrell; Lloyd Roberts; Michael Bailey; Jayne Sheldrake; Peter T Rycus; Carol Hodgson; Carlos Scheinkestel; D Jamie Cooper; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Daniel Brodie; Vincent Pellegrino; David Pilcher
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Juan J Russo; Natasha Aleksova; Ian Pitcher; Etienne Couture; Simon Parlow; Mohammad Faraz; Sarah Visintini; Trevor Simard; Pietro Di Santo; Rebecca Mathew; Derek Y So; Koji Takeda; A Reshad Garan; Dimitrios Karmpaliotis; Hiroo Takayama; Ajay J Kirtane; Benjamin Hibbert
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Predictors of Survival for Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Requiring Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy.

Authors:  A Reshad Garan; Waqas A Malick; Marlena Habal; Veli K Topkara; Justin Fried; Amirali Masoumi; Aws K Hasan; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Ajay Kirtane; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Maryjane Farr; Yoshifumi Naka; Dan Burkhoff; Paolo C Colombo; Paul Kurlansky; Hiroo Takayama; Koji Takeda
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

8.  Predictors of successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) weaning after assistance for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Nadia Aissaoui; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Pascal Leprince; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Philippe Léger; Alain Pavie; Benoit Diebold; Jean Chastre; Alain Combes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Predictors of survival and ability to wean from short-term mechanical circulatory support device following acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  A Reshad Garan; Christina Eckhardt; Koji Takeda; Veli K Topkara; Kevin Clerkin; Justin Fried; Amirali Masoumi; Ryan T Demmer; Pauline Trinh; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Yoshifumi Naka; Dan Burkhoff; Ajay Kirtane; Paolo C Colombo; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2017-11-02

Review 10.  Extracorporeal Life Support for Adults With Respiratory Failure and Related Indications: A Review.

Authors:  Daniel Brodie; Arthur S Slutsky; Alain Combes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The ABCDE approach to difficult weaning from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Christiaan L Meuwese; Daniel Brodie; Dirk W Donker
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 19.334

2.  Prophylactic versus therapeutic left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, better safe than sorry?

Authors:  Pieter S van der Wal; Myrthe P J van Steenwijk; Leon J Montenij; Dirk W Donker; Christiaan L Meuwese
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Basics of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  William C Wrisinger; Shaun L Thompson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  An innovative ovine model of severe cardiopulmonary failure supported by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Authors:  Silver Heinsar; Jae-Seung Jung; Sebastiano Maria Colombo; Sacha Rozencwajg; Karin Wildi; Kei Sato; Carmen Ainola; Xiaomeng Wang; Gabriella Abbate; Noriko Sato; Wayne Bruce Dyer; Samantha Annie Livingstone; Leticia Pretti Pimenta; Nicole Bartnikowski; Mahe Jeannine Patricia Bouquet; Margaret Passmore; Bruno Vidal; Chiara Palmieri; Janice D Reid; Haris M Haqqani; Daniel McGuire; Emily Susan Wilson; Indrek Rätsep; Roberto Lorusso; Jacky Y Suen; Gianluigi Li Bassi; John F Fraser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Clinical efficacy of direct or indirect left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for primary cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Steven Char; Justin Fried; Andrew Melehy; Sanket Mehta; Yuming Ning; Paul Kurlansky; Koji Takeda
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Clinical Characteristics of 10 Pregnant and Postpartum Women With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Qiao Gu; Weihua Peng; Ying Zhu; Shaosong Xi; Mengyuan Diao; Wei Hu; Xiaokang Zeng
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.