| Literature DB >> 34645960 |
Fatma Corak Eroglu1, Mehmet Ali Sekeroglu2, Tugce Horozoglu Ceran2, Mert Simsek2, Gozde Hondur2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of the obstruction of lacrimal drainage system (LDS) in patients with pseudoexfoliation (PXF) syndrome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34645960 PMCID: PMC8511857 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01799-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eye (Lond) ISSN: 0950-222X Impact factor: 4.456
Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients.
| PXF syndrome group (152 eyes of 76 patients) | Control group (170 eyes of 85 patients) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean ± SD (range) | 68.4 ± 8.8 (50–93) | 66.8 ± 9.3 (51–81) | 0.249* |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 46/76 (60.5%) | 49/85 (57.6%) | 0.311Ɨ |
| Female | 30/76 (39.5%) | 36/85 (42.4%) | |
| BCVA (Snellen Decimal) | 0.69 ± 0.14 | 0.76 ± 0.13 | 0.681* |
| IOP (mmHg) | 19.4 ± 4.5 | 16.8 ± 2.9 | 0.073* |
*Independent sample-t test, ƗPearson χ2 test. P < 0.05 accepted as statistically significant.
PXF Pseudoexfoliation, BCVA Best corrected visual acuity (in Snellen decimals), IOP Intraocular pressure.
Comparison of PXF syndrome and control groups in terms of prevalence and type of obstruction of LDS.
| PES group | Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Obstruction of LDS (total) | 32/152 (21.1%) | 21/170 (12.2%) | 0.061Ɨ |
| Obstruction of proximal LDS | 27/152 (17.7%) | 17/170 (10.0%) | |
| Punctal stenosis | 23/152 (15.1%) | 13/170 (7.6%) | |
| Canalicular stenosis | 4/152 (2.6%) | 4/170 (2.4%) | 0.569ǂ |
| Obstruction of distal LDS (NLDO) | 5/152 (3.3%) | 4/170 (2.4%) | 0.741ǂ |
| Complete obstruction of distal LDS | 2/152 (1.3%) | 2/170 (1.2%) | 0.910ǂ |
| Incomplete obstruction of distal LDS | 3/152 (2%) | 2/170 (1.2%) | 0.334ǂ |
ƗPearson χ2 test, ǂFischer exact test. P < 0.05 accepted as statistically significant and denoted in bold.
PXF Pseudoexfoliation, LDS lacrimal drainage system, NLDO nasolacrimal duct obstruction.