Literature DB >> 22233264

Tear osmolarity in unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome.

Banu Açikalın Öncel1, Eylem Pinarci, Yonca A Akova.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate tear osmolarity of patients with clinically unilateral pseudoexfoliation (PEX) syndrome and to compare the values with otherwise normal subjects.
METHODS: Sixty-two eyes of 31 patients with unilateral PEX syndrome and 31 eyes of 31 normal subjects were studied. The TearLab osmolarity system (OcuSense, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to measure tear osmolarity. Eyes were grouped as normal eyes of patients having unilateral PEX syndrome (group A), eyes of patients having unilateral PEX syndrome with deposits of PEX material (group B) and eyes of normal subjects (group C). Differences in tear osmolarity were compared among groups A, B and C. Independent t-tests and paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The mean tear osmolarity was 298.7 ± 7.8 mOsm/l (range 285 to 306) in the control group (group C), 306.3 ± 6.6 mOsm/l (range 290 to 314) in the eyes of patients having PEX syndrome with deposits of pseudoexfoliative material (group B) and 301.4 ± 7.1 mOsm/l (range 284 to 305) in the fellow eye of these patients (group A). There was a significant difference between tear osmolarity of groups C and B (independent t-test, p = 0.011). Also, there was a significant difference between the osmolarity of each eye of patients with unilateral PEX syndrome (groups A and B) (paired t-test, p = 0.001). The difference between tear osmolarity of groups A and C was not statistically significant (independent t-test, p = 0.146).
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, tear osmolarity is higher in both eyes of patients when compared with normal subjects, using the independent t-test (although highest in clinically positive eyes of these patients). Both eyes of patients having PEX syndrome could be more prone to the development of dry eye syndrome.
© 2012 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2012 Optometrists Association Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22233264     DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00683.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  7 in total

1.  Conjunctival changes in different clinical variants of early pseudoexfoliation.

Authors:  Aparna Rao; Gopinath Das; Sarada Sarangi; Debananda Padhy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Response to "Variability of Tear Osmolarity Measurements With a Point-of-Care System in Healthy Subjects-Systematic Review".

Authors:  Benjamin David Sullivan
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Transient expression of Wnt5a elicits ocular features of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in mice.

Authors:  Yong Yuan; Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt; Robert Ritch; Mindy Call; Fred B Chu; Fei Dong; Taylor Rice; Jianhua Zhang; Winston W-Y Kao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Tear osmolarity after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Ēriks Elksnis; Ilze Lāce; Guna Laganovska; Renārs Erts
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-24

Review 5.  Changes in peri-ocular anatomy and physiology in pseudoexfoliation syndrome (Review).

Authors:  Efstathios T Detorakis; Georgios Bontzos; Eleni E Drakonaki; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  A Case-Cohort Study of Exfoliation Risk Factors and Literature Review.

Authors:  Ahmad M Mansour; Anastasios G P Konstas; Hana A Mansour; Abdul R Charbaji; Khalil M El Jawhari
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 7.  Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Richard Potvin; Sarah Makari; Christopher J Rapuano
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.