PURPOSE: To create a nomogram including the translational speed of the microkeratome blade, microkeratome head size and precut tissue thickness to predict the postcut thickness for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to obtain the thinnest possible graft. METHODS: This prospective study incorporated 48 grafts for DSAEK from March 2017 to June 2020. Corneal tissue for DSAEK was prepared by 3 experienced physicians using the Moria Evolution 3E (Moria Inc, Antony, France) microkeratome with 400, 450 and 500 μm head sizes. Precut central corneal thickness was measured with a DGH 550 handheld pachymeter (Pachette 2), taking an average of 3 readings. The microkeratome head was selected according to precut tissue thickness. The selected microkeratome head size was 150 μm less than the donor cornea thickness. Two translational speeds were used for the microkeratome cuts. One month after surgery, the central lenticular thickness was measured with a Visante® Optical Coherence Tomography caliper (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Germany). A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Forty-eight donor grafts were prepared. Mean graft thickness was 97.58 ± 29.84 μm (range 39-176 μm). Of the 48 samples, central graft thickness was < 120 µm (81.3%) in 39, < 100 µm (58.3%) in 28 and < 80 µm (37.5%) in 18 at 1-month follow-up. There were no statically significant differences between translational speeds. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram with an automated microkeratome to obtain thin grafts for DSAEK provided good graft thickness results without donor waste.
PURPOSE: To create a nomogram including the translational speed of the microkeratome blade, microkeratome head size and precut tissue thickness to predict the postcut thickness for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to obtain the thinnest possible graft. METHODS: This prospective study incorporated 48 grafts for DSAEK from March 2017 to June 2020. Corneal tissue for DSAEK was prepared by 3 experienced physicians using the Moria Evolution 3E (Moria Inc, Antony, France) microkeratome with 400, 450 and 500 μm head sizes. Precut central corneal thickness was measured with a DGH 550 handheld pachymeter (Pachette 2), taking an average of 3 readings. The microkeratome head was selected according to precut tissue thickness. The selected microkeratome head size was 150 μm less than the donor cornea thickness. Two translational speeds were used for the microkeratome cuts. One month after surgery, the central lenticular thickness was measured with a Visante® Optical Coherence Tomography caliper (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Germany). A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Forty-eight donor grafts were prepared. Mean graft thickness was 97.58 ± 29.84 μm (range 39-176 μm). Of the 48 samples, central graft thickness was < 120 µm (81.3%) in 39, < 100 µm (58.3%) in 28 and < 80 µm (37.5%) in 18 at 1-month follow-up. There were no statically significant differences between translational speeds. CONCLUSIONS: A nomogram with an automated microkeratome to obtain thin grafts for DSAEK provided good graft thickness results without donor waste.
Authors: W Barry Lee; Deborah S Jacobs; David C Musch; Stephen C Kaufman; William J Reinhart; Roni M Shtein Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Vito Romano; Bernhard Steger; Jern Y Chen; Sherif Hassaan; Mark Batterbury; Colin E Willoughby; Sajjad Ahmad; Ahmed Elsheikh; Stephen B Kaye Journal: Cornea Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Vito Romano; Bernhard Steger; Jayavani Myneni; Mark Batterbury; Colin E Willoughby; Stephen B Kaye Journal: J Cataract Refract Surg Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.351
Authors: Joaquim N Murta; Andreia M Rosa; Maria Joao C Quadrado; Ana D Russo; Sergio S Brito; Maria Fátima L Silva Journal: Eur J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 2.597
Authors: Albert Y Cheung; Joshua H Hou; Peter Bedard; Veronique Grimes; Natalie Buckman; Medi Eslani; Edward J Holland Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.651