Literature DB >> 30008068

Single versus double pass technique for preparation of ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues from donated whole eyes.

Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi1, Tahereh Chamani2, Bahareh Kheiri3, Mohammad Ali Javadi3.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to analyze the preoperative thickness profile and endothelial rating of ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) tissues prepared with a single versus double microkeratome pass from donated whole eyes and corresponding eye bank postoperative results. Microkeratome-assisted UT-DSAEK tissues were prepared from freshly donated whole eyes with single-pass (SP) and double-pass (DP) technique in the Central Eye Bank of Iran. Preoperative thickness profiles and endothelial cell densities of UT-DSAEK tissues were obtained from optical coherence tomography and specular microscopy, respectively, and compared between groups. Corneal perforation rates during the eye bank preparation and postoperative reports of transplanted UT-DSAEK tissues were also compared. Over a 15-month period, 342 UT-DSAEK tissues were prepared: 248 via SP and 94 with DP technique. Mean donor corneal central thickness was 610 ± 58 µm with SP and 790 ± 100 µm with DP technique. Mean central thickness of UT-DSAEK tissues was not statistically different between the groups (84.8 ± 11.0 µm with SP and 85.1 ± 10.5 µm with DP technique, P = 0.857). Mean increase of UT-DSAEK thickness from central to pericentral and peripheral cornea was not significantly different with both techniques. Mean differences between thicknesses of 2 pericentral locations and between those of 2 peripheral locations were not statistically different in the study groups. Corneal perforation of 1.6 and 1.1% occurred in SP and DP groups, respectively. Failed graft was reported 6 months postoperatively in 4 (1.6%) cases with SP and in 1 (1.1%) case with DP technique. Preoperative thickness profiles of UT-DSAEK tissues prepared from donated whole eyes via SP technique were not significantly different from those prepared with DP, showing a symmetric increase of thickness towards peripheral locations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double-pass; Endothelial keratoplasty; Microkeratome; Single-pass; UT-DSAEK

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30008068     DOI: 10.1007/s10561-018-9712-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank        ISSN: 1389-9333            Impact factor:   1.522


  3 in total

1.  Nomogram for single-pass automated microkeratome graft preparation for ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Álvaro Sánchez-Ventosa; Antonio Cano-Ortiz; Pablo Morales; Timoteo González-Cruces; Vanesa Díaz Mesa; Alberto Villarrubia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Preparation of endothelial keratoplasty lenticules with Gebauer SLc Original versus Moria CBm Carriazo-Barraquer and Moria One-Use Plus microkeratomes.

Authors:  Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi; Tahereh Chamani; Bahareh Kheiri; Mohammad Ali Javadi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  Commentary: Microkeratome-assisted ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Hariprasad Vokuda; Krishnaprasad Kudlu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.848

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.