Literature DB >> 25933404

Reliability of the Effect of Artificial Anterior Chamber Pressure and Corneal Drying on Corneal Graft Thickness.

Vito Romano1, Bernhard Steger, Jern Y Chen, Sherif Hassaan, Mark Batterbury, Colin E Willoughby, Sajjad Ahmad, Ahmed Elsheikh, Stephen B Kaye.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of artificial anterior chamber (AAC) pressure and corneal drying on the graft thickness in preparation for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
METHODS: Twenty-seven corneoscleral discs were placed in an AAC. The AAC pressure (15, 45, 92, 109, and 198 mm Hg) was controlled using the height of an infusion bottle and a roller clamp. The endothelium was removed in 1 subgroup. Corneas were exposed to room air or repeatedly dried using cellulose spears. Central corneal thickness was measured every 90 seconds for the first 15 minutes and again at 20 minutes using an ultrasound pachymeter (SP-100, Tomey).
RESULTS: There was a significant linear relationship between the corneal thickness and both AAC pressure and corneal drying. Very high coefficients of determination and narrow 95% confidence intervals were present, in particular for high pressures and drying. The rate of thinning increased with increasing pressure and drying to 1.6% per minute. At the maximum rate of thinning, a 10% reduction in corneal thickness occurred in 6 minutes or 100 μm in 8.8 minutes. Removal of the corneal endothelium reduced the rate of thinning to 0.3% per minute (R = 0.72).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing AAC pressure and corneal drying reduced the graft thickness at a very predictable rate. Adequate corneal thinning can be achieved by increasing the pressure in the AAC by closing the clamp followed by removal of the residual corneal epithelium and repeated drying with a cellulose spear for 5 to 10 minutes, depending on the initial corneal thickness. This method is simple and is both suitable for use in the eye bank and by the surgeon.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25933404     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  5 in total

1.  Nomogram for single-pass automated microkeratome graft preparation for ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Álvaro Sánchez-Ventosa; Antonio Cano-Ortiz; Pablo Morales; Timoteo González-Cruces; Vanesa Díaz Mesa; Alberto Villarrubia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure.

Authors:  Alastair J Stuart; Vito Romano; Gianni Virgili; Alex J Shortt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-25

3.  Deformation velocity imaging using optical coherence tomography and its applications to the cornea.

Authors:  Samuel Lawman; Peter W Madden; Vito Romano; Yue Dong; Sharon Mason; Bryan M Williams; Stephen B Kaye; Colin E Willoughby; Simon P Harding; Yao-Chun Shen; Yalin Zheng
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Eye bank versus surgeon prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues: Influence on adhesion force in a pilot study.

Authors:  Vito Romano; Mohit Parekh; Ahmed Kazaili; Bernhard Steger; Riaz Akhtar; Stefano Ferrari; Stephen B Kaye; Hannah J Levis
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.969

5.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty - Complication and management of a single case for tissue preparation and graft size linked to post-op descemetorhexis disparity.

Authors:  Mohit Parekh; Alessandro Ruzza; Abigail Kaye; Bernhard Steger; Stephen B Kaye; Vito Romano
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2018-09-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.