Literature DB >> 34636992

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: comparison of internal aberrations and visual quality.

Yueyang Zhong1, Yanan Zhu1, Wei Wang1, Kai Wang1, Xin Liu1, Ke Yao2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the internal aberrations and optical quality after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS).
METHODS: This study included patients who received FLACS or CPCS from January 2016 to July 2019. Postoperative examinations included wavefront measurements under pupil diameters of 3.0 mm and 5.0 mm, intraocular lens (IOL) decentration, visual acuity (VA), and refractive outcomes. Visual quality was measured with Strehl ratio and modulation transfer function (MTF). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on monofocal or multifocal-extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL.
RESULTS: The study consisted of 221 eyes (105 eyes in FLACS and 116 eyes in CPCS). With a pupil diameter of 5.0 mm, FLACS demonstrated a significantly lower root mean square of total internal aberration (P = 0.004), higher order aberrations (HOAs) (P = 0.034), tilt (P = 0.049), coma (P = 0.004), and spherical aberration (P = 0.014). IOL tilt was found to be positively correlated with total internal aberration (P < 0.001), HOAs (P < 0.001), and coma (P < 0.001). The FLACS group presented significantly smaller IOL decentration than the CPCS group (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in terms of VA and refractive outcomes between groups. In the multifocal-EDOF subgroup, Strehl ratio and MTF values were significantly higher in the femtosecond group with a 3.0-mm pupil.
CONCLUSION: FLACS induced significantly lower values of IOL tilt, decentration, and internal aberrations compared with the CPCS group with a pupil diameter of 5.0 mm, while no significant differences were found in the VA or optical quality over long-term observation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (registration number ChiCTR2000038965).
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery; Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery; Higher-order aberration; Optical quality; Wavefront aberration

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34636992     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05441-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

Review 1.  Theoretical limits to visual performance.

Authors:  J Schwiegerling
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Jason D Marsack; Roberto Ramos; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Internal aberrations and optical quality after femtosecond laser anterior capsulotomy in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Kata Miháltz; Michael C Knorz; Jorge L Alió; Agnes I Takács; Kinga Kránitz; Illés Kovács; Zoltán Z Nagy
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Wave aberration of human eyes and new descriptors of image optical quality and visual performance.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Higher Order Aberrations in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Versus Manual Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Paul H Ernest; Marko Popovic; Matthew B Schlenker; Lindsay Klumpp; Iqbal Ike K Ahmed
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Preliminary investigation of corneal wavefront aberration following femtosecond laser clear corneal incision for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sebastiano Serrao; Giuseppe Lombardo; Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello; Marianna Rosati; Marco Lombardo
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery: Study from the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Sonia Manning; Peter Barry; Ype Henry; Paul Rosen; Ulf Stenevi; David Young; Mats Lundström
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 8.  Wavefront analysis and Zernike polynomial decomposition for evaluation of corneal optical quality.

Authors:  Cristina M Oliveira; Andreia Ferreira; Sandra Franco
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Zoltan Nagy; Agnes Takacs; Tamas Filkorn; Melvin Sarayba
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Preliminary clinical investigation of cataract surgery with a noncontact femtosecond laser system.

Authors:  A-Yong Yu; Li-Yang Ni; Qin-Mei Wang; Fang Huang; Shuang-Qian Zhu; Lin-Yan Zheng; Yan-Feng Su
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  1 in total

1.  Increasing rim height depth for safe femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy in intumescent white cataracts with liquified cortex.

Authors:  Beatriz Vidal-Villegas; José Antonio Gegúndez Fernández; Bárbara Burgos-Blasco; David Diaz-Valle; Ricardo Cuiña-Sardiña; Rosalía Méndez-Fernández; Pedro Arriola-Villalobos; Mayte Ariño-Gutiérrez; Jose Manuel Benítez-Del-Castillo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 1.645

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.