Literature DB >> 21986002

Internal aberrations and optical quality after femtosecond laser anterior capsulotomy in cataract surgery.

Kata Miháltz1, Michael C Knorz, Jorge L Alió, Agnes I Takács, Kinga Kránitz, Illés Kovács, Zoltán Z Nagy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare ocular and internal aberrations after femtosecond laser anterior capsulotomy and continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis in cataract surgery.
METHODS: In this prospective study, anterior capsulotomy was performed during cataract surgery with an intraocular femtosecond (FS) laser (Alcon LenSx Inc) in 48 eyes. As a control group, continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis (CCC) was performed in 51 eyes. Wavefront aberrometry, corneal topography, and objective visual quality were measured using the OPD-Scan (NIDEK Co Ltd). Vertical and horizontal tilt, coma, and visual quality metrics were evaluated separately to determine whether the source of aberrations was ocular or internal. Main outcome measures included postoperative residual refraction, uncorrected and corrected visual acuities, ocular and internal aberrations, Strehl ratio, and modulation transfer function (MTF).
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted between the FS and CCC groups, respectively, in postoperative sphere (-0.60 ± 1.50 vs -0.50 ± 1.40 diopters [D]), postoperative cylinder (1.30 ± 1.01 vs 1.10 ± 1.10 D), uncorrected distance visual acuity (0.86 ± 0.15 vs 0.88 ± 0.08), or corrected distance visual acuity (0.97 ± 0.08 vs 0.97 ± 0.06). The FS group had significantly lower values of intraocular vertical tilt (-0.05 ± 0.36 vs 0.27 ± 0.57) and coma (-0.003 ± 0.11 vs 0.1 ± 0.15), and significantly higher Strehl ratios (0.02 ± 0.02 vs 0.01 ± 0.01) and MTF values at all measured cycles per degree, compared to the CCC group.
CONCLUSIONS: Capsulotomy performed with an intraocular FS laser induced significantly less internal aberrations measured by the NIDEK OPD-Scan aberrometer compared to eyes that underwent CCC, which may result in better optical quality after the procedure. Copyright 2011, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21986002     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20110913-01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  25 in total

1.  Investigating the ocular temperature rise during femtosecond laser lens fragmentation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Sara Matteoli; Andrea Corvi; Luca Terracciano; Eleonora Favuzza; Stefano Gherardini; Filippo Caruso; Roberto Bellucci
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  [Current state of refractive surgery of the cornea and lens].

Authors:  M C Knorz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  The journey to femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: new beginnings or a false dawn?

Authors:  S Trikha; A M J Turnbull; R J Morris; D F Anderson; P Hossain
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  [Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery].

Authors:  H B Dick; T Schultz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Femtosecond laser capsulotomy versus manual capsulotomy: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dao-Wei Qian; Hai-Ke Guo; Shang-Li Jin; Hong-Yang Zhang; Yuan-Cun Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT.

Authors:  Alexander C Day; Jennifer M Burr; Kate Bennett; Rachael Hunter; Catey Bunce; Caroline J Doré; Mayank A Nanavaty; Kamaljit S Balaggan; Mark R Wilkins
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: comparison of internal aberrations and visual quality.

Authors:  Yueyang Zhong; Yanan Zhu; Wei Wang; Kai Wang; Xin Liu; Ke Yao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Visual and refractive outcomes of laser cataract surgery.

Authors:  Heather Chen; Thomas Hyatt; Natalie Afshari
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.761

9.  All laser cataract surgery compared to femtosecond laser phacoemulsification surgery: corneal trauma.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua; Peter A Mattei; Lisa Toto; Alessandra Mastropasqua; Luca Vecchiarino; Gennaro Falconio; Emanuele Doronzo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Conventional Phacoemulsification in Shallow Anterior Chambers and Glaucoma.

Authors:  Zhou Zhou; Li Li; Siming Zeng; Wenjing He; Min Li
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.