Literature DB >> 34636724

Decreased recent adaptation at human mendelian disease genes as a possible consequence of interference between advantageous and deleterious variants.

Chenlu Di1, Jesus Murga Moreno2, Diego F Salazar-Tortosa1, M Elise Lauterbur1, David Enard1.   

Abstract

Advances in genome sequencing have improved our understanding of the genetic basis of human diseases, and thousands of human genes have been associated with different diseases. Recent genomic adaptation at disease genes has not been well characterized. Here, we compare the rate of strong recent adaptation in the form of selective sweeps between mendelian, non-infectious disease genes and non-disease genes across distinct human populations from the 1000 Genomes Project. We find that mendelian disease genes have experienced far less selective sweeps compared to non-disease genes especially in Africa. Investigating further the possible causes of the sweep deficit at disease genes, we find that this deficit is very strong at disease genes with both low recombination rates and with high numbers of associated disease variants, but is almost non-existent at disease genes with higher recombination rates or lower numbers of associated disease variants. Because segregating recessive deleterious variants have the ability to interfere with adaptive ones, these observations strongly suggest that adaptation has been slowed down by the presence of interfering recessive deleterious variants at disease genes. These results suggest that disease genes suffer from a transient inability to adapt as fast as the rest of the genome.
© 2021, Di et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive evolution; bottlenecks; disease genes; evolutionary biology; genetic interference; human; selective sweeps

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34636724      PMCID: PMC8526059          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.69026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  49 in total

1.  Two steps forward, one step back: the pleiotropic effects of favoured alleles.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The effect of deleterious alleles on adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Toby Johnson; Nick H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Disentangling selection on genetically correlated polygenic traits via whole-genome genealogies.

Authors:  Aaron J Stern; Leo Speidel; Noah A Zaitlen; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Characterizing mutagenic effects of recombination through a sequence-level genetic map.

Authors:  Bjarni V Halldorsson; Gunnar Palsson; Olafur A Stefansson; Hakon Jonsson; Marteinn T Hardarson; Hannes P Eggertsson; Bjarni Gunnarsson; Asmundur Oddsson; Gisli H Halldorsson; Florian Zink; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Michael L Frigge; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Simon N Stacey; Patrick Sulem; Gisli Masson; Agnar Helgason; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Effects of linkage on rates of molecular evolution.

Authors:  C W Birky; J B Walsh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Positive natural selection in the human lineage.

Authors:  P C Sabeti; S F Schaffner; B Fry; J Lohmueller; P Varilly; O Shamovsky; A Palma; T S Mikkelsen; D Altshuler; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++.

Authors:  Eugene V Davydov; David L Goode; Marina Sirota; Gregory M Cooper; Arend Sidow; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  A global reference for human genetic variation.

Authors:  Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Richard M Durbin; Erik P Garrison; Hyun Min Kang; Jan O Korbel; Jonathan L Marchini; Shane McCarthy; Gil A McVean; Gonçalo R Abecasis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD): update 2021.

Authors:  Allan Peter Davis; Cynthia J Grondin; Robin J Johnson; Daniela Sciaky; Jolene Wiegers; Thomas C Wiegers; Carolyn J Mattingly
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in hominid evolution.

Authors:  Graham McVicker; David Gordon; Colleen Davis; Phil Green
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  1 in total

1.  Strong evidence for the adaptive walk model of gene evolution in Drosophila and Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Ana Filipa Moutinho; Adam Eyre-Walker; Julien Y Dutheil
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 9.593

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.