| Literature DB >> 34636175 |
Patricia Wischmann1, Ramesh Chennupati1, Isabella Solga1, Felix Funk2, Stefanie Becher1, Norbert Gerdes1, Stefan Anker3, Malte Kelm1, Christian Jung1.
Abstract
AIMS: Iron deficiency is frequently observed in patients with acute coronary syndrome and associates with poor prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Anaemia is linked to dysregulation of iron metabolism, red blood cell dysfunction, and increased reactive oxygen species generation. Iron supplementation in chronic heart failure is safe and improves cardiac exercise capacity. Increases in iron during ischaemia or immediately after reperfusion are associated with detrimental effects on left ventricular (LV) function. The safety and applicability of iron during or immediately after reperfusion of AMI in anaemia are not known. We aimed to study the safety and efficacy of iron supplementation within 1 h or deferred to 24 h after reperfusion of AMI by analysing LV function and infarct size. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Anaemia; Drug safety; Iron deficiency
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34636175 PMCID: PMC8712778 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Figure 1Protocols and left ventricular functional analysis of anaemic mice without and with intravenous iron application after reperfused AMI. Sham group of mice (Group A) were punctured with a lancet on the cheek (facial vein) without collection of circulating blood volume. Anaemia (Group B) was induced by blood withdrawal on three consecutive days until a target Hb < 90 g/L was reached. On Day 4, mice were subjected to AMI followed by 24 h of reperfusion. Echocardiographic analysis of left ventricular function was performed after induction of anaemia (Day 3) and 24 h after reperfused AMI. After reperfused AMI, anaemic mice were randomly assigned to iron treatment 1 h (Group C) or 24 h (Group D) after reperfusion using cage numbers. TTC Staining was performed 24 h after iron administration of reperfused AMI. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; TTC, triphenyl tetrazolium chloride
Blood count with laboratory characteristics of anaemia
| Anaemia | Sham | + | Sham | + | + | + |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iron (time after I/R) | − | − | − | − | 1 h | 24 h |
| Group | A | B | A | B | C | D |
| Condition | Pre‐AMI | Post‐AMI | ||||
| Laboratory parameters | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( |
| Haemoglobin (g/dL) | 14.1 ± 0.5 | 9.0 ± 0.5 | 13.2 ± 0.3 | 9.3 ± 0.5 | 9.7 ± 1.9 | 10.7 ± 1.2 |
| Haematocrit (HCT, %) | 46.0 ± 1.6 | 27.6 ± 1.7 | 43.2 ± 2.4 | 30.2 ± 2.7 | 29.2 ± 5.3 | 33.6 ± 3.2 |
| MCV (μm3) | 50.2 ± 0.4 | 53.4 ± 1.2 | 53.0 ± 1.4 | 56.7 ± 1.6 | 56.5 ± 4.3 | 61.0 ± 1.7 |
| MCH (pg) | 15.4 ± 0.4 | 17.7 ± 0.4 | 15.9 ± 0.6 | 17.6 ± 1..2 | 18.4 ± 0.8 | 19.5 ± 0.5 |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 30.6 ± 0.9 | 33.3 ± 0.6 | 28.7 ± 0.2 | 31.1 ± 1.4 | 33.3 ± 1.3 | 32.1 ± 1.1 |
| RDW (%) | 13.8 ± 0.3 | 14.8 ± 0.8 | 15.4 ± 0.9 | 16.7 ± 1.3 | 16.0 ± 0.6 | 20.2 ± 1.3 |
| RBC (106/μL) | 9.2 ± 0.3 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 7.9 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.6 | 5.3 ± 1.4 | 5.5 ± 0.6 |
| BC (103/μL) | 7.7 ± 2.3 | 7.9 ± 3.9 | 9.6 ± 3.5 | 7.5 ± 3.5 | 5.4 ± 1.2 | 8.6 ± 2.4 |
| Platelets (103/μL) | 1450.7 ± 147 | 1759.0 ± 107 | 1318.5 ± 340 | 1397.8 ± 491 | 1794.0 ± 196 | 1994.0 ± 152 |
Induction of anaemia resulted in changes in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels. Anaemic mice were characterized by thrombocytosis with enhanced platelet counts at baseline. Additional treatment of intravenous iron did not affect normal blood counts. After reperfused AMI, anaemic mice showed increased MCV and RDW as compared with pre‐AMI, while MCH and MCHC remained unaffected. Data are mean ± SD from n = 6–8 mice/group. Two‐way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test.
AMI, acute myocardial infarction; I/R, ischaemia/reperfusion; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; RBC, red blood cell; RDW, red blood cell distribution width; WBC, white blood cell.
P < 0.05 vs. sham,
P < 0.01 vs. sham,
P < 0.001 vs. sham,
P < 0.05 vs. pre‐AMI,
P < 0.01 vs. pre‐AMI,
P < 0.001 vs. pre‐AMI,
P < 0.05 vs. anaemia,
P < 0.01 vs. anaemia,
P < 0.01 vs. anaemia + iron after 24 h,
P < 0.01 vs. anaemia + iron after 24 h,
P < 0.001 vs. anaemia + iron after 24 h.
Figure 2Blood loss anaemia is associated with iron deficiency and haemolysis. Data are mean ± SD from n = 8 (A–F), n = 7 (G) mice/group. Unpaired t‐test; n.s. = not significant; *P < 0.05 vs. sham
Figure 3Analysis of LV function in anaemic mice with and without iron supplementation after reperfused AMI. LV function of sham and sham anaemic mice were analysed at baseline (Day 3) and 24 h after reperfused AMI. Anaemic mice were treated with i.v. iron 1 and 24 h after reperfused AMI and underwent echocardiographic analysis. Anaemia was associated with increases in heart rate (HR), end‐diastolic volume (EDV), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO). Superimposition of AMI further impaired global left ventricular (LV) function in anaemia. The increase in end‐systolic volume (ESV) associated with AMI is in part rescued by application of iron 24 h post‐AMI (C). Data are presented as mean ± SD from n = 6–8 mice/group. Multiple comparison with two‐way ANOVA with Tukey post‐hoc test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. sham; # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001 vs. pre‐AMI; and $$ P < 0.01 vs. anaemia. AMI, acute myocardial infarction
Figure 4Assessment of infarct size in anaemic mice with and without iron supplementation after reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) stainings were performed in mice underwent I/R surgery with and without iron supplementation. (A) Representative images of TTC staining. Quantitative analysis of (B) area at risk and (C) infarct area as percentage of the area at risk for each group: data are presented as mean ± SD; unpaired t‐test; *P < 0.05 vs. sham. I/R, ischaemia/reperfusion