Literature DB >> 11457742

Simple bedside additive tool for prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions.

M Moscucci1, E Kline-Rogers, D Share, M O'Donnell, A Maxwell-Eward, W L Meengs, P Kraft, A C DeFranco, J L Chambers, K Patel, J G McGinnity, K A Eagle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk-adjustment models for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) mortality have been recently reported, but application in bedside prediction of prognosis for individual patients remains untested. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between July 1, 1997 and September 30, 1999, 10 796 consecutive procedures were performed in a consortium of 8 hospitals. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were identified by use of multivariate logistic regression analysis. The final model was validated by use of the bootstrap technique. Additional validation was performed on an independent data set of 5863 consecutive procedures performed between October 1, 1999, and August 30, 2000. An additive risk-prediction score was developed by rounding coefficients of the logistic regression model to the closest half-integer, and a visual bedside tool for the prediction of individual patient prognosis was developed. In this patient population, the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.6%. Multivariate regression analysis identified acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, history of cardiac arrest, renal insufficiency, low ejection fraction, peripheral vascular disease, lesion characteristics, female sex, and advanced age as independent predictors of death. The model had excellent discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90) and was accurate for prediction of mortality among different subgroups. Near-perfect correlation existed between calculated scores and observed mortality, with higher scores associated with higher mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Accurate predictions of individual patient risk of mortality associated with PCI can be achieved with a simple bedside tool. These predictions could be used during discussions of prognosis before and after PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11457742     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.104.3.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  28 in total

1.  Prediction of long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  William S Weintraub; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Jocelyn M Weiss; Elizabeth R Delong; Eric D Peterson; Sean M O'Brien; Paul Kolm; Lloyd W Klein; Richard E Shaw; Charles McKay; Laura L Ritzenthaler; Jeffrey J Popma; John C Messenger; David M Shahian; Frederick L Grover; John E Mayer; Kirk N Garratt; Issam D Moussa; Fred H Edwards; George D Dangas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Multivariate prediction of major adverse cardiac events after 9914 percutaneous coronary interventions in the north west of England.

Authors:  A D Grayson; R K Moore; M Jackson; S Rathore; S Sastry; T P Gray; I Schofield; A Chauhan; F F Ordoubadi; B Prendergast; R H Stables
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Risk scoring for percutaneous coronary intervention: let's do it!

Authors:  A Siotia; J Gunn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Effects of SVM parameter optimization on discrimination and calibration for post-procedural PCI mortality.

Authors:  Michael E Matheny; Frederic S Resnic; Nipun Arora; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  The relative merits of population-based and targeted prevention strategies.

Authors:  Donna M Zulman; Sandeep Vijan; Gilbert S Omenn; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Incremental prognostic information from kidney function in patients with new onset coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Mark A Hlatky; David Shilane; Tara I Chang; Derek Boothroyd; Alan S Go
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Predicting complications of percutaneous coronary intervention using a novel support vector method.

Authors:  Gyemin Lee; Hitinder S Gurm; Zeeshan Syed
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Contemporary mortality risk prediction for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from 588,398 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; David Dai; Elizabeth R DeLong; J Matthew Brennan; Mandeep Singh; Sunil V Rao; Richard E Shaw; Matthew T Roe; Kalon K L Ho; Lloyd W Klein; Ronald J Krone; William S Weintraub; Ralph G Brindis; John S Rumsfeld; John A Spertus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Risk stratification for long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Chuntao Wu; Fabian T Camacho; Spencer B King; Gary Walford; David R Holmes; Nicholas J Stamato; Peter B Berger; Samin Sharma; Jeptha P Curtis; Ferdinand J Venditti; Alice K Jacobs; Edward L Hannan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.546

10.  Implementing an innovative consent form: the PREDICT experience.

Authors:  Carole Decker; Suzanne V Arnold; Olawale Olabiyi; Homaa Ahmad; Elizabeth Gialde; Jamie Luark; Lisa Riggs; Terry DeJaynes; Gabriel E Soto; John A Spertus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.