Literature DB >> 34625454

The Impact of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Cervical Sagittal Parameters and Its Correlation With Pain and Functional Outcome of Patients With Neck Pain.

Mohsen Rostami1,2,3, Navid Moghadam1,3, Ibrahim Obeid4, Morteza Faghih Jouibari2, Mohammad Zarei5, Mersad Moosavi3, Alireza Khoshnevisan2, Farzin Farahbakhsh1,2, Fatemeh Moosaie1, Saeid Ehteshami6, Alireza Borghei7, Milad Shafizadeh2, Ramin Kordi1, Masoud Khadivi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examines the changes in segmental and global cervical sagittal parameters after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. We also investigate whether these changes have any relation with postoperative pain and functional outcome of the patients.
METHODS: Sixty patients (37 females and 23 males) with a mean age of 45.9 ± 9.5 years who were candidates of single-level ACDF due to cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy participated in the study. At baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after ACDF, outcomes of the study including sagittal balance parameters, pain intensity, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were measured among the patients. Intensity of pain and neck disability were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and validated version of NDI, respectively. Using a standard lateral cervical radiography, the Cobb angle for occiput-C2, C1-C2, and C2-C7 as well as operation-level angle (OA; Cobb's angle at the level of discopathy), the thoracic inlet angle, and C7 and T1 slope angles were measured.
RESULTS: The intensity of pain and neck disability of patients improved significantly during the follow up of the study comparing with baseline measurements (P < .001). There was a significant correlation between the increase of C2-C7 angle, C1-C2 angle, and OA and improvement in neck pain and NDI at 1- and 6-month follow ups.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that changes at C2-C7 angle, C1-C2 angle, and OA have positive significant correlation with clinical outcome including pain improvement and decrease of disability in patients who undergo ACDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study might be beneficial in selection of cervical cages with appropriate size during ACDF surgery, as our findinds showed that larger cages could lead to better functional outcome in patients. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2021 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical Discectomy; Disability; Myelopathy; Sagittal balance; radiculopathy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34625454      PMCID: PMC8651199          DOI: 10.14444/8115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  23 in total

1.  Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; S Craig Humphreys; Tae-Hong Lim; Soon Tack Jeong; Jesse G Kim; Scott D Hodges; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases.

Authors:  Mihir R Bapat; Kshitij Chaudhary; Amit Sharma; Vinod Laheri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Pierre Roussouly; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Gennaro D'Acunzi; Gilles Perrin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Importance of sagittal balance in determining the outcome of anterior versus posterior surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Randolph Gray
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2009-11

5.  Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: an analysis of occipitocervical and spinopelvic interdependence, with C-7 slope as a marker of cervical and spinopelvic alignment.

Authors:  Susan Núñez-Pereira; Wolfgang Hitzl; Viola Bullmann; Oliver Meier; Heiko Koller
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-04-24

Review 6.  Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review.

Authors:  Justin K Scheer; Jessica A Tang; Justin S Smith; Frank L Acosta; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Benjamin Blondel; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Vedat Deviren; Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-06-14

7.  Kinematic analysis of the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc degeneration in the cervical spine.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Henry J Hymanson; Yuichiro Morishita; Wubing He; Haihong Zhang; Guizhong Wu; Min Ho Kong; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using PEEK anatomical cervical cage and allograft bone.

Authors:  C Faldini; M Chehrassan; M T Miscione; F Acri; M d'Amato; C Pungetti; D Luciani; S Giannini
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-17

9.  Correlation of Clinical and Radiological Outcome After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Polyetheretherketone Cage.

Authors:  Savvas L Spanos; Ioannis D Siasios; Vassilios G Dimopoulos; Konstantinos N Paterakis; Dimos S Mastrogiannis; Theofanis P Giannis; Aggeliki A Fotiadou; John Pollina; Kostas N Fountas
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-01-26

10.  Cervical sagittal balance parameters after single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Correlations with clinical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Ioannis Siasios; Evan Winograd; Asham Khan; Kunal Vakharia; Vassilios G Dimopoulos; John Pollina
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictive nomogram of cage nonunion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A retrospective study in a spine surgery center.

Authors:  Kai Zhou; Longfei Ji; Shuwei Pang; You Tang; Changliang Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.