Literature DB >> 34625236

Ex vivo biomechanical analysis of the Ross procedure using the modified inclusion technique in a 3-dimensionally printed left heart simulator.

Yuanjia Zhu1, Mateo Marin-Cuartas2, Matthew H Park3, Annabel M Imbrie-Moore3, Robert J Wilkerson4, Sarah Madira4, Danielle M Mullis4, Y Joseph Woo5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The inclusion technique was developed to reinforce the pulmonary autograft to prevent dilation after the Ross procedure. Anticommissural plication (ACP), a modification technique, can reduce graft size and create neosinuses. The objective was to evaluate pulmonary valve biomechanics using the inclusion technique in the Ross procedure with and without ACP.
METHODS: Seven porcine and 5 human pulmonary autografts were harvested from hearts obtained from a meat abattoir and from heart transplant recipients and donors, respectively. Five additional porcine autografts without reinforcement were used as controls. The Ross procedure was performed using the inclusion technique with a straight polyethylene terephthalate graft. The same specimens were tested both with and without ACP. Hemodynamic parameter data, echocardiography, and high-speed videography were collected via the ex vivo heart simulator.
RESULTS: Porcine autograft regurgitation was significantly lower after the use of inclusion technique compared with controls (P < .01). ACP compared with non-ACP in both porcine and human pulmonary autografts was associated with lower leaflet rapid opening velocity (3.9 ± 2.4 cm/sec vs 5.9 ± 2.4 cm/sec; P = .03; 3.5 ± 0.9 cm/sec vs 4.4 ± 1.0 cm/sec; P = .01), rapid closing velocity (1.9 ± 1.6 cm/sec vs 3.1 ± 2.0 cm/sec; P = .01; 1.8 ± 0.7 cm/sec vs 2.2 ± 0.3 cm/sec; P = .13), relative rapid opening force (4.6 ± 3.0 vs 7.7 ± 5.2; P = .03; 3.0 ± 0.6 vs 4.0 ± 2.1; P = .30), and relative rapid closing force (2.5 ± 3.4 vs 5.9 ± 2.3; P = .17; 1.4 ± 1.3 vs 2.3 ± 0.6; P = .25).
CONCLUSIONS: The Ross procedure using the inclusion technique demonstrated excellent hemodynamic parameter results. The ACP technique was associated with more favorable leaflet biomechanics. In vivo validation should be performed to allow direct translation to clinical practice.
Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ross procedure; aortic valve replacement; pulmonary autograft; pulmonary valve

Year:  2021        PMID: 34625236      PMCID: PMC8924018          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.06.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  30 in total

1.  Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for valve-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Efstratios I Charitos; Hans-Hinrich Sievers
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

2.  Ex Vivo Analysis of a Porcine Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Aneurysm Disease Model.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Matthew H Park; Michael J Paulsen; Hanjay Wang; John W MacArthur; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Autograft and pulmonary allograft performance in the second post-operative decade after the Ross procedure: insights from the Rotterdam Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Mostafa Mokhles; Dimitris Rizopoulos; Eleni R Andrinopoulou; Jos A Bekkers; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Emmanuel Lesaffre; Ad J J C Bogers; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Left ventricular flow patterns in healthy subjects and patients with prosthetic mitral valves: an in vivo study using echocardiographic particle image velocimetry.

Authors:  Réka Faludi; Mariola Szulik; Jan D'hooge; Paul Herijgers; Frank Rademakers; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Ross operation in the adult: long-term outcomes after root replacement and inclusion techniques.

Authors:  Laurent de Kerchove; Jean Rubay; Agnès Pasquet; Alain Poncelet; Caroline Ovaert; Manuel Pirotte; Michel Buche; William D'Hoore; Philippe Noirhomme; Gebrine El Khoury
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Comparison of biomechanical and structural properties between human aortic and pulmonary valve.

Authors:  Peteris Stradins; Romans Lacis; Iveta Ozolanta; Biruta Purina; Velta Ose; Laila Feldmane; Vladimir Kasyanov
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Suitability of the porcine aortic model for transcatheter aortic root repair.

Authors:  Changtian Wang; Mario Lachat; Evelyn Regar; Ludwig Karl von Segesser; Francesco Maisano; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-06-01

8.  A Novel Aortic Regurgitation Model from Cusp Prolapse with Hemodynamic Validation Using an Ex Vivo Left Heart Simulator.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Michael J Paulsen; Bryant Priromprintr; Matthew H Park; Hanjay Wang; Haley J Lucian; Justin M Farry; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Left Ventricular Flow Analysis.

Authors:  Victoria M Stoll; Aaron T Hess; Christopher T Rodgers; Malenka M Bissell; Petter Dyverfeldt; Tino Ebbers; Saul G Myerson; Carl-Johan Carlhäll; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.792

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Novel Device for Intraoperative Direct Visualization of a Pressurized Root in Aortic Valve Repair.

Authors:  Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Michael J Paulsen; Matthew H Park; Nicholas A Tran; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.